Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1] 2

Author Topic: Stupid embark location question - more Terrifying?  (Read 2053 times)

Ross Vernal

  • Bay Watcher
  • Hilarity ensues.
    • View Profile
Stupid embark location question - more Terrifying?
« on: September 05, 2011, 02:49:51 pm »

This is probably a stupid question, but...

http://img703.imageshack.us/img703/1051/embark.jpg

In your experience, is this a good balance between "Terrifying No Woods" for FUN!! and "Temperate Woods" for Functional?

I have yet to do a Freezing embark, and Terrifying isn't a normal embark choice, so trying to figure out if I have enough terror is a little hard. xD
« Last Edit: September 05, 2011, 03:31:21 pm by Ross Vernal »
Logged

Coolnesstod

  • Bay Watcher
  • Drink, Work, Repeat.
    • View Profile
Re: Stupid embark location question.
« Reply #1 on: September 05, 2011, 02:53:17 pm »

Depends on your play style, But for freezing, you might want to NOT bring cats(or dig quickly and hide them) For cats freeze easily. Other than that is up to you, the player, To try it.
Logged
All glory to the Hypnotoad.
Random fact: Robin Williams was once addicted to cocaine during the late 1980's/early 1990's.

Ross Vernal

  • Bay Watcher
  • Hilarity ensues.
    • View Profile
Re: Stupid embark location question.
« Reply #2 on: September 05, 2011, 02:56:32 pm »

Duly noted; no freezing kittehs for me.

I adapt my play style to the environment. Would YOU put the fort there, or more towards the Terrifying Mountain?
Logged

franti

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Stupid embark location question.
« Reply #3 on: September 05, 2011, 03:06:27 pm »

I can't really tell what I'm looking at in that photo, but I advise you to go for the terrifying. Glumprongs.
Logged
Adamantine, Steel, Pig Iron, Iron, Bronze, Bismuth Bronze, Platinum, Brass, Black Bronze, Billon, Rose Gold, Electrum, Bismuth, Aluminum, Gold, Copper, Tin, Sterling Silver, Silver, Nickel, Zinc, Lead, Nickel Silver, Trifle Pewter, Fine Pewter, Lay Pewter.

Ross Vernal

  • Bay Watcher
  • Hilarity ensues.
    • View Profile
Re: Stupid embark location question.
« Reply #4 on: September 05, 2011, 03:13:05 pm »

Well, the right quarter of my embark is on a Terrifying Freezing Mountain with Flux and no trees - I doubt I can find glumprong there. The left 3/4ths of the embark zone is an Untamed Freezing Temperate Freshwater Swamp, and I'm reasonably certain there's a river running across the top part.

I'm just curious if the specific embark location would be considered optimal for what it is, and if I should shift right to get more Mountain or not.
Logged

Lainers

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Stupid embark location question.
« Reply #5 on: September 05, 2011, 03:18:04 pm »

Can you even live w/o trees?
Logged

Corneria

  • Bay Watcher
  • [TORTURE_FOR_FUN:ACCEPTABLE][TRESPASSING:SHUN]
    • View Profile
Re: Stupid embark location question.
« Reply #6 on: September 05, 2011, 03:26:42 pm »

Can you even live w/o trees?
Yes. 3/4 of that embark has trees either way.
Logged
Oh yeah: Nazis.  Now I lost the argument.  So you can't argue with me anymore.  Nyah.

Ross Vernal

  • Bay Watcher
  • Hilarity ensues.
    • View Profile
Re: Stupid embark location question - more Terrifying?
« Reply #7 on: September 05, 2011, 03:35:46 pm »

Possibly; at least 1/4th of the map will.
Logged

JAFANZ

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Stupid embark location question.
« Reply #8 on: September 06, 2011, 04:18:20 am »

Can you even live w/o trees?

With the introductions of Rock, Glazed Earthenware, & Stoneware (& Porcelain?) booze containers, I believe the only thing wood is still required for is Beds, & you almost always have 3 logs available from deconstructing your wagon (I don't know whether or not you get them on embarks where the wagon is deconstructed on arrival).

I'd think it would also be a very rare embark where there wasn't some sort of wood in the caverns (unless you set them to be deserts in the Advanced world gen).

And finally, I don't think sleeping without beds will actually kill your dorfs, just cause bad thoughts, so if you managed to create one bed, & use it to designate a dormitory in a room made of gold with lots of masterwork or artifacts to give them happy thoughts... (NB: I haven't tried this).
Logged

plynxis

  • Bay Watcher
  • Oh god I'm so tired, leave me alone...
    • View Profile
Re: Stupid embark location question - more Terrifying?
« Reply #9 on: September 06, 2011, 03:08:28 pm »

terrifying isnt necessarily terrifying. sometimes you get undead with evil biomes but i think terrifying is evil+savage so you'll probably get werewolves and shit which are easy to kill and they tend to attack lone dwarves, not groups.

i think the balance will be ok if you're looking for a proper challenge but you might be disappointed, especially if you know how to prepare for it on embark. i'd suggest a few things as i tend to embark on evil/terrifying biomes but i dont wanna spoil your !!FUN!! ;)
Logged
What? Go away, I'm sleep deprived...

ohgoditburns

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Stupid embark location question - more Terrifying?
« Reply #10 on: September 06, 2011, 03:13:58 pm »

I think the only "evil" animal in mountains is the dark gnome. They aren't a threat at all.

If you want a threat in an evil biome, you're looking for a terrifying temperate shrubland - ogres, werewolves, and harpies.
Logged
The landscape routinely being soaked in flammable fluids somehow seems less than benevolent.

plynxis

  • Bay Watcher
  • Oh god I'm so tired, leave me alone...
    • View Profile
Re: Stupid embark location question - more Terrifying?
« Reply #11 on: September 06, 2011, 03:24:50 pm »

yeah but if you buy some gnomeblight, gnomes are the only thing to melt in that stuff (according to the wiki).

so you have the unique opportunity of watching little people slowly melt to death in a pool of green useless goo.

dunno if its worth it though
Logged
What? Go away, I'm sleep deprived...

Nil Eyeglazed

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Stupid embark location question - more Terrifying?
« Reply #12 on: September 06, 2011, 05:10:22 pm »

Yeah, terrifying mountains tend not to be very terrifying.  Every once in a while you'll luck out with skeletal giant eagles (which really are pretty much push-overs these days anyways) but mostly it's just irritating dark gnomes.

Undead aren't scary.  I felt like I'd lucked out when I got zombie elephants and zombie giant leopards on a terrifying tropical shrubland, but they were push-overs too.  Ultimately, all the undead did were warn me of ambushes and soak up some goblin arrows.
« Last Edit: September 06, 2011, 06:59:14 pm by Nil Eyeglazed »
Logged
He he he.  Yeah, it almost looks done...  alas...  those who are in your teens, hold on until your twenties...  those in your twenties, your thirties...  others, cling to life as you are able...<P>It should be pretty fun though.

krisslanza

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Stupid embark location question - more Terrifying?
« Reply #13 on: September 06, 2011, 06:44:08 pm »

Evil biomes, in general, are a pretty big bag of hit or miss. Sometimes you get the really FUN stuff - ogres, harpies, really scary skeletons or zombies, etc. - but I usually just get big dead wastelands with boring skeletons that pose no real problem.

plynxis

  • Bay Watcher
  • Oh god I'm so tired, leave me alone...
    • View Profile
Re: Stupid embark location question - more Terrifying?
« Reply #14 on: September 07, 2011, 04:58:19 am »

Yeah, terrifying mountains tend not to be very terrifying.  Every once in a while you'll luck out with skeletal giant eagles (which really are pretty much push-overs these days anyways) but mostly it's just irritating dark gnomes.

Undead aren't scary.  I felt like I'd lucked out when I got zombie elephants and zombie giant leopards on a terrifying tropical shrubland, but they were push-overs too.  Ultimately, all the undead did were warn me of ambushes and soak up some goblin arrows.

Evil biomes, in general, are a pretty big bag of hit or miss. Sometimes you get the really FUN stuff - ogres, harpies, really scary skeletons or zombies, etc. - but I usually just get big dead wastelands with boring skeletons that pose no real problem.

So true. However, skeletons can shit you up real bad if you aren't equipped properly. first time i embarked on a proper evil biome and it had skeletal horses. they fucking kill shit and are hard to kill too. horses in general are pretty strong and aggressive but normal ones just run away. being skeletal makes them stronger in areas they already are strong. thats when i discovered how shields with a little skill and a proper weapon can go a very long way in defending. did a lot of ‼Science‼ there. Current terrifying biome has the occasional werewolf and moose men for crying out loud... i hope the next release with necromancy and stuff also has hordes of zombies and ghosts and shit - now THAT would be fucking awesome
« Last Edit: September 07, 2011, 05:00:09 am by plynxis »
Logged
What? Go away, I'm sleep deprived...
Pages: [1] 2