Err... I was assuming mislynch if cult and no mafia, since that's worst case scenario. I was sort of rushing at the end.
And here I was hoping that at least you would think before posting /:-l
And you still didn't answer my questions.
Well well well... What do we have here?
Wuba, have you been referring to here?
So... here's a good question: Is it bad to follow someone if they're right?
On principle, no. Except OB has never made any such claims, as I just said.
He clearly has time to write up a WoT, yet none to participate. Not okay.
Aaaand what was the point of summarizing that part of my post?
What.
No, seriously, what?
He could say,"I don't think either of them is scum. Rather, I think <X> is scum. <post case against X here>." Would that still be scummy? Not in my opinion.
That's my point numbnut. He
didn't say that. No wait. My point is actually that
it didn't seem to bother you that he didn't do it. You just showed that you are aware that instead of doing what he did. And yet you only FoS'd him for his lame excuse rather than the fact that he is being so passive.
I started asking him questions today. Yesterday I was busy with NUKE.
Oh boohoo you cannot deal with more than one person at a time. How very sad.
So, suspecting someone for the same reasons as someone else does is a scumtell now? Because if it is, I'm never playing this game again. That is just absurd.
It's not. Bandwagonning however is. which is why I voted for you in the first place.
Had you just said "Webadict had a good point there. That made me suspicious of TolyK. Why do you care so much about it?", then I'd have retracted my vote. Instead however you go great lengths to tell me that I am throwing around shit. Which is why my vote is staying where it is for now.
Being busy is also a terrible excuse for passivity. If I had said 'why are you lurking', maybe. But if you have enough time to defend yourself, you have enough time to scumhunt.
So? Fact is that when you question people's lack of activity, then most of the time they will state "I am/was busy" or "My internet broke down"(which, considering he still can post, is not the case). Still a stupid question.
Because I thought I'd FoS'd you, and forgot that I hadn't.
Fine. Can happen.
Using his arguments means I agree with him. This is a terrible point.
Or you are blindly following him.
Which is why I started investigating you. Your actions betray your words and I can throw my excrements at whoever I want, thank you very much.
So you think Orangebottle is suspicious for using an original case rather than YOUR case against TolyK?
How the fuck did you come to that conclusion. I didn't have a case on TolyK until this day. And besides, OrangeBottle
isn't using an original case. He's using webadict's.
How do you even get such an idea if it's impossible to be the case?
So your problem with Orangebottle isn't the copying of Webadict's case, it's that Webadict isn't getting credit where credit is due? Or is it more that Orangebottle is trying to pass off Webadic't scumhunting as original?
I don't really care who has credit. However OB used wuba's arguments and I wanted to find out if webadict got him convinced or if he was just piggybacking. And guess what. The answer I wanted to hear didn't happen until much later.
Brought up by webadict himself. That OB failed to bring it up himself tells me that it wasn't the case.
Also, anyone want to bet TolyK doesn't post?
No thanks. But I hope he does, because damn that WoT must be impressively huge and written in meticulous detail.
Or, much more likely, non-existent.
Basically, if you want to prove Orangebottle scum, you have to prove Orangebottle's case on Webadict right
Wouldn't that prove wuba to be scum, though? You meant "wrong" there right?