My case, collected nicely:
When I replaced billybobfred, I looked for something suspicious that hadn't been pointed out yet, so I could get an early lead on the game. Mormota's pulling out of his vote provided such a thing- Dakarian's scumhunting bible says to always be aggressive even if you might get lynched- and he wasn't scumhunting afterwards, claiming to not have any leads because of being new, even though that as my first post, me questioning him.
Anyway, not scumhunting looked passive to me, and I misrad a phrase of his, thinkng himm to be saying that Jim Groovester was telling him not to be aggressive. He proceeded to suspicion me back for "jumping on him", questioning him, so I pointed that out, and he tried to cover it with the misread sentence. I explained that and continued pressing, and he cracked. He voted me back for questioning him, an OMGUS which he is trying to cover up, after the fact, by saying my reaons were suspicious, and never explained (despite the fact that I clarified the point about Jim telling him not to be aggressive as a misread, and despite the fact that I had repeated my reasoning on his passivity two or three times), which, if you look at the giant parentheses-enclosed text back there, is quite clearly not true.
He's reacting badly to my further quesitoning, which has devolved, and he is repeating the same thing over, a thing based on ignoring several earlier things I had explained, may I add, in a manner a if I was being ridiculous by scumhunting him, and then -despite much reasoning from me- he STILL continues to say I'm ignoring him, hence what this has turned into.