311 aa. And even then, only if you don't mind having to fight against their army.
Which reminds me:
332. If you attack an enemy which is vastly superior to you in every way and who you have no hope of defeating, you should not expect to survive the encounter with your ship intact.
332 a. Especially if your only plan of attack is to "attack it's weak points", which is not a revolutionary concept.
332 aa. Also, if it's is a new-model military vessel on its maiden voyage, there isn't any reason you should know what its weak points are better that its designers did.
333. No, the border patrol cannot spare one of their few military ships to deliver your mission objective to the system's government while you attempt to hold off the invasion with your heavily damaged civilian craft. If the mission was that important, maybe you should have completed it and let the border patrol do their job.
334. I'm not sure how or why a civilian craft would carry a fighter squadron, but, unless they're fighter-bombers, they don't have a realistic chance to take down a battlecruiser, and they'll be cut to pieces by point-defense lasers before they manage to penetrate its shields.
334 a. Seriously, using them as a last-ditch distraction would be less of a senseless waste of human life.
335. Even if the Geneva Convention doesn't exist in a particular place and time, or is no longer official recognized, anything it defines as a war crime is going to be at least frowned upon.
336. Space Forces boarding parties are meant to enter into hostile territory and are expected to meet heavy resistance. For this reason, at least, their armor cannot be pierced by thrown shurikens.
337. A good plan does not hinge upon people being bad at their job, especially when you have no reason to believe this to be the case.