http://www.cnn.com/2011/POLITICS/07/29/debt.talks/index.html?hpt=hp_t1So Boehner's bill passed in the House, with some Republicans opposed and no Dems in support. (218-210, if you care.)
The two key measures that guarantee its defeat from Senate Dems are:
-A constitutional amendment requiring a balanced budget
before a debt ceiling increase is extended through 2012and
-A second debt ceiling increase debate before the 2012 elections, making the current one under debate only good for 6 months.
The first one is something that, under normal conditions, would find Democrat support. But NOW? SERIOUSLY? They want to debate and pass a constitutional amendment as a pre-requisite to passing a temporary, 11th hour bill? Hell, I'm in support of a measure like that, but I'm not willing to debate something as important as a constitutional amendment in a day's fucking time.
The second is just pure bullshit political maneuvering. Those hacks are so focused on 2012 they're willing to let the house come down around their ears because of it. At this point, Dems may have to concede to it. Although there are risks that a temporary increase doesn't send a strong enough signal to credit raters, who will see a temporary fix and on-going argument as just another sign of our long-term financial instability. So Dems may not even be able to accept that.
Still, I can't get over the balls on these guys. I remember riders attached to past debt ceiling increase bills, the kind that are outrageous and have nothing to do with monetary policy. They always fell off in the end. So it's not like they're attaching anti-abortion legislation to it or something.....but the fact these guys think a constitutional amendment is something you casually toss around as a bargaining chip is not only stupid, it's dangerous.