Didn't anticipate a chance to get back in the game. I want to take a second to apologize, as I'd intended to in my Bah Post:
Out of combined laziness and business, I hadn't read the thread, and had only had a chance to skim the arguments of others and cherry-pick ones that I liked. I hadn't even read the vote count by the time the end of the day was rolling around, and knowing I didn't have time to remedy that, and aware of my own ignorance, I abstained. I didn't realize that it would put me on the chopping block, and as such I do feel fairly responsible for my own lynching. I would like to apologize to Meph, and other players, that I spent Day 1 mostly absent. As promised, I intend to remedy that from Day 2 onward; I was glad to get a chance to swap theories with our Warlock last night, and already did an extensive read of the full thread for it. I'm even more glad to be back, and get another shot at the day game.
Anyway, onto the game. I can confirm
CrownOfFire's statement, having chatted with him last night. I can't say whether he's scum or not; the only things he wrote of were asking who my top suspects were (which I provided), and to let me know that I could confirm him as Town in the event that I came back. He didn't respond when I joked that "Warlocks can't be scum Night 1, eh?", and never responded to either of my replies. I don't like the feeling I got from our 1-way exchange, and how he seems to really want me to confirm him as Town... but he may just be trying to publicly clear himself the best way he can see. If a Town Warlock, he'll be a priority target for Scum, so I'm more inclined to let him be for now, and let him show more colors as we go.
Anyway Jim, frankly speaking I don't like your style at all, nor do I have any reason to trust you
or your arguments; you've got far too much conviction in your own opinions, for having so very little logic behind them. Right now, we can all see how great the crap lynch you spearheaded on Day 1 went.
Let it not be forgotten that, in order to foment my lurker-lynch, you dropped a lurker-lynch on
Pandarsenic (despite agreeing that his scum-meta involved activelurking), and even
went out of your way to DEFEND Pandar's lurking as "Town behavior". After that, you swapped to lead a vote on a different lurker, parroting the same two arguments repeatedly for the
REST OF THE DAY (namely, "He Agreed with Max White," and "He's Lurking"). Never once did you revise your stance as the day changed, nor respond to any shifting factors. You even went so far as to
attack players voting for Kilikan, claiming they were "trying to save me", while simultaneously avoiding answering questions about
why Kilikan and you had identical arguments.
Where do you get off condemning one lurker, while pardoning another in the same damned post? Where the hell do you find so much conviction for such a weak lurkervote? How can you accuse someone who cherry-picks someone else's argument as Scum, while chainsaw-defending, attacking the attackers of, and arguing in protection of Kilikan, who did the same damned thing to your arguments?
You're double-standard-having scum,
Jim Groovester. You just want people killed, and you don't want to look bad doing it. Your efforts to protect your wayward scumbuddy
Kilikan are more than obvious, and with your weak arguments based on these petty little opinions, I have a hard time believing that you have any real suspicions at all.
Oh, I can't wait to see how much bile, piss, and vinegar you spew out when in the spotlight. There is a little part of me that will heartily enjoy this.
Crap Post Error. Fake-Edited.
No edits. Not even ninja edits you can make before you get a watermark.
It's okay though. I can wait to totally dismantle your argument.
We are not going to have this talk again, Jimmy. It was from a mistake, having clicked Post instead of Preview when I was checking link formatting. You're going to deal with that benign fake-edit, and do so quietly.
Author
Topic: Supernatural Mafia 4 - Game Over! Demonic Victory (Read 281191 times)