Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 7

Author Topic: Clash of Empires: Britain vs NewsCorp  (Read 6498 times)

Aqizzar

  • Bay Watcher
  • There is no 'U'.
    • View Profile
Clash of Empires: Britain vs NewsCorp
« on: July 07, 2011, 06:11:54 pm »

You may or may not know the name "NewsCorp", as in News Corporation, the international media conglomerate founded by Rupert Murdoch.  NewsCorp is most famous in America as the parent corporation of 20th Century FOX and everything under it, the New York Post, the Wall Street Journal, and other outlets.  As big and famous for being big as NewsCorp is in America, it's basically the broadcast news agency in the United Kingdom, and owner of a wide host of newspapers and tabloids.  Any member of the British government will tell you that Murdoch can make and break political campaigns there, and until recently, NewsCorp was set to become the de facto media company of Britain by buying out British Sky Broadcasting.  But now the deal and possibly the company itself are falling apart under serious government inquiry into a possible of illegal actions by one of the company's tabloids.  The story has a disparate elements and moving parts, but the core is what's really breaking out.

The original heart of NewsCorp's trouble began in 2002: Police were searching for 13-year-old Milly Dowler who went missing, and relaunched their search when they noticed someone had been deleting messages from her cell-phone's voicemail account.  As an investigation turned out, the voicemail account was surreptiously accessed by reporters, who deleted messages they had left.  Specifically, reporters from News of the World, a tabloid owned by News International, a subset of NewsCorp (Murdoch's entities are not known for their creative naming).  As the story goes, the tabloid had taken to hiring private investigators, namely a one Jonathan Rees, to use their essentially illegal skills to obtain personal information for the paper to print in scoops; in exchange, World used it's resources as journalists to keep tabs on a police investigation of Rees, helping him evade prosecution.  Police have been investigating the paper for years now, and keep turning up new cases of phone-hacking long after the original connection to Rees and others ended, including celebrities and politicians, and now recently dead British soldiers, as well as other crimes such as bribing police officers for confidential information.

The editor in chief of News of the World at the time was Andy Coulson, resigned from the paper in 2007 after one of the journalists was convicted of the original hacking charges.  He went on to become Prime Minister David Cameron's press secretary before resigning in February amid the ongoing investigation.  The Parliament has been in an uproar over the appointment before and since, especially in light of the new information.  Cameron is doing his best to stay on the right side of the charges.  After Coulson, Murdoch appointed one of his long-time star executives, Rebekah Brooks, to head World.  She was already involved with NewsCorp's British print companies, and is now legally alleged to have known something about the company's systematic record of breaking the law as early as 2002.

The crux of the legal storm now surrounding NewsCorp boils down to: employees of the company repeatedly and knowingly broke the law in the service of their business; the upper echelon of NewsCorp, especially World's chief editors, could not have been unaware of these activities, and if they weren't encouraging the illegal activity, they certainly weren't trying to stop it; and that these managers have since the start been uncooperative, and have deliberately waylaid the government's investigations.  Each successive inquiry turns up more hanging threads of illegal activity in other areas - British police are now pretty well convinced that World may not have been the only arm of company breaking the law, and may not be limited to the British group.

In the next few days, Scotland Yard will announce who the government intends to file charges against in their new round of inquiries; Brooks is already on the list, and some members of Parliament are calling for charges on James Murdoch, Rupert's son and head of NewsCorp's overall British division.  Depending on what comes out in testimony, Rupert Murdoch himself could be indited, as his fast and furious shell game with NewsCorp's management over the last few years could be construed as a further interference with the legal process.  Whatever happens, News of the World is already closing this week, and investors and advertisers around the world are rapidly breaking from NewsCorp's other media outlets.  Maybe most hilariously (to me), is the special legal team Murdoch assembled to defend the company and conduct an "internal investigation".  Leading NewsCorp's answer to charges of unlawfully obtaining private communication is American attorney Viet Dinh, George Bush's chief legal architect of the Patriot Act.


This certainly isn't the "end of Fox News" or some such, but is an earthquake in British media and politics.  I don't know a damn thing about British politics or law, so I'm hoping somebody over there knows more than I do.
Logged
And here is where my beef pops up like a looming awkward boner.
Please amplify your relaxed states.
Quote from: PTTG??
The ancients built these quote pyramids to forever store vast quantities of rage.

nenjin

  • Bay Watcher
  • Inscrubtable Exhortations of the Soul
    • View Profile
Re: Clash of Empires: Britain vs NewsCorp
« Reply #1 on: July 07, 2011, 06:30:47 pm »

One can only hope the Justice Department here decides to poke around some of Murdoch's holdings because of this. I find it hard to believe the rules change that much across the pond in Murdoch's empire.
Logged
Cautivo del Milagro seamos, Penitente.
Quote from: Viktor Frankl
When we are no longer able to change a situation, we are challenged to change ourselves.
Quote from: Sindain
Its kinda silly to complain that a friendly NPC isn't a well designed boss fight.
Quote from: Eric Blank
How will I cheese now assholes?
Quote from: MrRoboto75
Always spaghetti, never forghetti

Vattic

  • Bay Watcher
  • bibo ergo sum
    • View Profile
Re: Clash of Empires: Britain vs NewsCorp
« Reply #2 on: July 07, 2011, 07:01:56 pm »

It's strange seeing things written in the order they happened rather than the order they were found out.

It's been somewhat amusing to see Cameron in an awkward position. He is good friends with Rebekah Brooks and the popular opinion is that she should quit or be fired for at least having authority over those that were hacking. He's being diplomatic rather than voicing the opinions of the electorate. He's said more than one inquiry might be needed but not until much later, after the police investigation, which is perceived as him kicking the issue into the long grass.

There is also some suspicion over the police doing the investigation into the company what with them having received money for information from the same. Not to mention that they completely failed the first investigation as made clear by how much new information they've found this time around. Involvement with the company has been cited as a possible reason for the first investigation ending early.

I am concerned that they use this as an excuse to stifle the press more than necessary but then the political power the tabloids hold in this country isn't good either.
« Last Edit: July 07, 2011, 07:04:44 pm by Vattic »
Logged
6 out of 7 dwarves aren't Happy.
How To Generate Small Islands

Leafsnail

  • Bay Watcher
  • A single snail can make a world go extinct.
    • View Profile
Re: Clash of Empires: Britain vs NewsCorp
« Reply #3 on: July 07, 2011, 07:03:38 pm »

Interesting fact: Rebekah Brooks and Andy Coulson openly admitted to bribing police for information back in 2003.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v1AJjnl2y8U

What this video perhaps doesn't make clear enough is that under UK law there is no public interest defence for bribing police officers.  It's just illegal and quite how they escaped criminal charges at that point is a bit of a mystery.

Coulson is in even more trouble since he testified in December that he had no knowledge of any payments to police officers (in a perjury trial, ironically).
Logged

Heron TSG

  • Bay Watcher
  • The Seal Goddess
    • View Profile
Re: Clash of Empires: Britain vs NewsCorp
« Reply #4 on: July 07, 2011, 07:32:07 pm »

I didn't realize NewsCorp was so huge. I'm rooting for Britain here.
Logged

Est Sularus Oth Mithas
The Artist Formerly Known as Barbarossa TSG

alway

  • Bay Watcher
  • 🏳️‍⚧️
    • View Profile
Re: Clash of Empires: Britain vs NewsCorp
« Reply #5 on: July 08, 2011, 12:07:13 am »

I didn't realize NewsCorp was so huge. I'm rooting for Britain here.
So huge, in fact, they have a wiki page unto itself for the list of media they own. Things ranging from Hulu and Direct2Drive to the Sun and New York Post. Based on their wiki page, they are the second largest media conglomerate after Disney.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_assets_owned_by_News_Corporation
« Last Edit: July 08, 2011, 12:12:20 am by alway »
Logged

Duuvian

  • Bay Watcher
  • Internet ≠ Real Life
    • View Profile
Re: Clash of Empires: Britain vs NewsCorp
« Reply #6 on: July 08, 2011, 02:25:23 am »

I didn't realize NewsCorp was so huge. I'm rooting for Britain here.
So huge, in fact, they have a wiki page unto itself for the list of media they own. Things ranging from Hulu and Direct2Drive to the Sun and New York Post. Based on their wiki page, they are the second largest media conglomerate after Disney.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_assets_owned_by_News_Corporation

Obviously Disney is the true power figure. How did we not see it coming when Mickey has so much secret money that he can give a duck named McScrooge enough gold to fill a pool to swim in.

Seriously though, I always knew those guys were trouble ever since when they got the supreme court to make the ability to lie with intentions using mass media networks legal under Freedom of Speech in the U.S.

It's like yelling Fire in the crowded theater on a global scale.
« Last Edit: July 08, 2011, 02:30:20 am by Duuvian »
Logged
FINISHED original composition:
https://app.box.com/s/jq526ppvri67astrc23bwvgrkxaicedj

Sort of finished and awaiting remix due to loss of most recent song file before addition of drums:
https://www.box.com/s/s3oba05kh8mfi3sorjm0 <-zguit

Ochita

  • Bay Watcher
  • Doofus ghostus
    • View Profile
Re: Clash of Empires: Britain vs NewsCorp
« Reply #7 on: July 08, 2011, 02:27:04 am »

Hm.
Can't say that I'm really surprised..

But go Britain, my home.
Logged
Quote from: Freeform
princest zaldo of hurl kindom: the mushroom aren't going to choice itself, ochita

Duuvian

  • Bay Watcher
  • Internet ≠ Real Life
    • View Profile
Re: Clash of Empires: Britain vs NewsCorp
« Reply #8 on: July 08, 2011, 02:51:07 am »

I didn't realize NewsCorp was so huge. I'm rooting for Britain here.
So huge, in fact, they have a wiki page unto itself for the list of media they own. Things ranging from Hulu and Direct2Drive to the Sun and New York Post. Based on their wiki page, they are the second largest media conglomerate after Disney.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_assets_owned_by_News_Corporation

Seriously though, I always knew those guys were trouble ever since when they got the supreme court to make the ability to lie with intentions using mass media networks legal under Freedom of Speech in the U.S.

It's like yelling Fire in the crowded theater on a global scale.

I mostly meant television and possibly radio, especially when involving alien invasions. The internet is paid for by lies since if the internet was regulated where you couldn't lie on it only business would use it. Not that I'm lying though.
Logged
FINISHED original composition:
https://app.box.com/s/jq526ppvri67astrc23bwvgrkxaicedj

Sort of finished and awaiting remix due to loss of most recent song file before addition of drums:
https://www.box.com/s/s3oba05kh8mfi3sorjm0 <-zguit

alway

  • Bay Watcher
  • 🏳️‍⚧️
    • View Profile
Re: Clash of Empires: Britain vs NewsCorp
« Reply #9 on: July 11, 2011, 05:55:06 pm »

An update: accusations against 2 other British holdings of murdoch. Though which are true is anyone's guess.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43709217/ns/world_news-europe/
Quote
Rupert Murdoch's media empire was besieged Monday by accusations that two more of his British newspapers engaged in privacy violations that included accessing former Prime Minister Gordon Brown's bank account information and stealing the medical records of his seriously ill baby son.
« Last Edit: July 11, 2011, 05:57:48 pm by alway »
Logged

scriver

  • Bay Watcher
  • City streets ain't got much pity
    • View Profile
Re: Clash of Empires: Britain vs NewsCorp
« Reply #10 on: July 11, 2011, 06:01:09 pm »

..So what is Fox reporting about this? ;)
Logged
Love, scriver~

Aqizzar

  • Bay Watcher
  • There is no 'U'.
    • View Profile
Re: Clash of Empires: Britain vs NewsCorp
« Reply #11 on: July 11, 2011, 06:11:11 pm »

..So what is Fox reporting about this? ;)

A reporter from Fox Business was actually giving Rupert Murdoch the infamous chase-reporter treatment, but he wouldn't take the bait.

The Fox News front page has no indication of any such story anywhere, which is understandable.  Trying to report on an ongoing lawsuit involving its parent company would be a very dangerous thing to do, since any material would easily count as public statements if anything turns out false... Although a search of the network says that Fox Business has been all over the story from the beginning, and they're not exactly soft stories either.  Basically, journalism.

I do love that Fox considers a quest to find Goliath's bones a front-page story.
Logged
And here is where my beef pops up like a looming awkward boner.
Please amplify your relaxed states.
Quote from: PTTG??
The ancients built these quote pyramids to forever store vast quantities of rage.

Virex

  • Bay Watcher
  • Subjects interest attracted. Annalyses pending...
    • View Profile
Re: Clash of Empires: Britain vs NewsCorp
« Reply #12 on: July 11, 2011, 06:40:45 pm »

Anyone know if Newscorp members have tried wiretapping the police officers that are on this case yet?
Logged

Jackrabbit

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Clash of Empires: Britain vs NewsCorp
« Reply #13 on: July 11, 2011, 07:18:50 pm »

The way a 186 year old newspaper collapsed literally overnight is astounding.

I'm not entirely sure what's going on, or the repercussions of it all, but it is really fun to watch.
Logged

nenjin

  • Bay Watcher
  • Inscrubtable Exhortations of the Soul
    • View Profile
Re: Clash of Empires: Britain vs NewsCorp
« Reply #14 on: July 11, 2011, 07:34:05 pm »

All print news organizations are teetering on the edge at this point, both financially and in terms of the service they provide. All it takes is a scandal like this to justify shutting one down, even ones that are close to 200 years old. I'm pretty sure the WSJ would survive something like this....but on the other hand, I think the NYT could come crashing down from such a scandal. They're all highly vulnerable.
Logged
Cautivo del Milagro seamos, Penitente.
Quote from: Viktor Frankl
When we are no longer able to change a situation, we are challenged to change ourselves.
Quote from: Sindain
Its kinda silly to complain that a friendly NPC isn't a well designed boss fight.
Quote from: Eric Blank
How will I cheese now assholes?
Quote from: MrRoboto75
Always spaghetti, never forghetti
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 7