You forgot "Irony was at the crime scene" in your evidence list against you. I hadn't driven that point hard because I wanted to be confident in LNCP's claim- I now am.
Two problems here. Very fascinating problems, in fact.
First of all, what did LNCP have to do with anything? He called it before I mentioned it, then I confirmed it. Unless he was bussing me, the odds of him lying were 0; and even if he was, why would that matter for calling me out?
Secondly, "Irony was at the crime scene" is what we call circumstantial evidence- useless without something else backing it up. How does it imply I killed Jim? "He could have, therefore he did?" The only way it makes any kind of sense to mention it on its own is if you're just piling everything you can think of onto your case, regardless of relevance.
1: Yes, meta is a point in my case against you. I keep thinking of you in that game when I'm reading this thread.
So this is your LYLO-level suspicion for your top pick: "I'm reminded of that one game I played with him." Even if it's entirely accurate, a single meta example is laughably bad reasoning for LYLO unless it's
extremely compelling. Unless you're trying to say I always play scum the same way (which would seem to imply the same is true of my town game), I don't see how it could be.
2: Again, you questioned someone other than your main two once out of a field of eight others. That's awfully focused.
I was still somewhat busy and distracted, so I wasn't exactly on my best game. I'm still not sure exactly why this would be a scumtell though, given that you haven't claimed that what I did have was subpar in any fashion.
3: Calling it "not tunnelling" is laughable. After completely ignoring Vector D2, you jump out with a vote on her- I wanted to know why. If you had any suspicions of Vector D2, why didn't you act on them?
Once again, you're trying to establish this damned if I do, damned if I don't scenario where both focusing on my scumpicks, and focusing on anyone who
isn't my scumpicks, is scummy. And even by itself, I still don't see it- I vote someone I hadn't mentioned previously and was under no pressure, in order to question her, and this is scummy somehow?
As for why I didn't mention it D2, I was distracted in general and distracted with Max.
As for the recent point: I didn't have any issue with your wording until you tried to go and say you said something else. Your wording is fine- being contradictory is not.
That's the thing: It's not the content, it's the wording. You must have known what I meant for it to make any sense, but you didn't mention it again until it gave you a pretense for claiming I was changing my story.
And about Dariush: Really? Do you think he is a dopp? If you think he is a survivor, then you'd agree lynching him would be idiotic. Well, not you, since that'd lead to you dopps winning. If you were town you'd see that it'd be stupid.
I think it's definitely possible. He was under decent pressure, and he'd know he just has to squeeze past one more day. Given that it'd also cut our chances of finding you and your buddy from 3/7 to 2/6, I'd say it could be a pretty cunning move.
I'll grant he's a dangerous lynch, but I'm not giving him a free pass for it. What about you? Why do you buy it completely?
I consider my case on you plenty solid enough. Lynching you today will give Joker one more chance to redeem himself if he's idiot town (highly unlikely at this point, but it could happen.)
Niiiiiice. Slightly buddying up to/giving yourself a chance to copout on
your #2 scumpick at LYLO just in case. That's not a scum move or anything.
Vector-things later.