Go die in a fire, lying scum.
You're so adorable, I want to hug you.
I love you too.
I'm fine with you taking jabs at me, but I'd hardly call an RV a bandwagon vote.
I'm not talking about that RV, I'm talking about you copying everyone else's reasons that Max ought to hang because he doesn't defend himself.
Oh? Where did I say that he ought to hang, eh? Or, for that matter, that he doesn't defend himself? Where have I copied
any reasons?
Protip: Don't fabricate evidence.
It makes you look bad.I'll call bullshit on this too. Show me the post.
Okay. Do you have anything original, or for that matter, substantial?
, which is pretty much a rephrasing of Toaster's accusation.
Well, it's true, isn't it?
Buddying is a nulltell because it relies either on associative tells (bullshit and stupid before one of them flips scum, and is stupid thereafter too because any scum worth his salt will try to pretend he never had a partner in the first place) or is plain stupid because it involves the scum consciously doing something that is risky, of limited use, and is obvious.
Lurking is a nulltell - especially on its own - because it either relies very heavily on meta, or is incredibly weak outside of D1 and without other tells to back it up. Neither condition has been fulfilled.
Both of your accusations are very run-of-the-mill, would take no effort to create, and are either very weak or nulltells (in other words, neither original nor substantial).
I'd also like to point out that you've done nothing to pursue any of your suspects, you've supplied no valid reasoning for any, and that your "buddying" accusation seems to be right off of Jim Groovester's case - with no prior signs of said suspicion while the debate raged on before you and with nothing else other than the mention.
[[citation_needed]]
I tell you something doesn't exist and you tell me to cite it? Lol what?
Call me stubborn, but I'd rather somebody say more than just "you don't scumhunt".
I was absent for most of that day, and I'm not about to give up what precious little remains of my life for you.
You're so adorable, I want to hug you.
Next time you try to shit on someone, make it more substantial.
You're so adorable, I want to hug you.
So, what's with the copypasta? Too afraid to slip up further?
Oh, wait - you're already doing it.
Hah. I love these two questions: You're trying to get me to support your case on him and sentence him (and others) at the same time. You'll then likely use my words against myself, no?
You're paranoidal, aren't you?
"Paranoidal" isn't a word, foo, and half the game consists of paranoia.
You're also being a bad sport, so stop that.
I'll humour you, though. IronyOwl came in a bit late, but now that he's started hunting, he's not a high-priority target for me. Lurkers should be prodded or told off; you can't do much else.
So, you plan to ignore both anybody who's scumhunting (in your weird definition of the word) and all lurkers and instead bandwagon on weak players. Duly noted.
Twist my words all you like, but your case isn't going to get any better.
I've got better places to put my vote than on people who haven't slipped up and are scumhunting well. Since lurking is very much a nulltell and he hasn't thrown any scumtells, of course he'd be low on my list.
I don't vote for the popular lynch without a damn good reason (AKA bandwagonning), perhaps even more so than other lynches.
And where did this bandwagon come up? Unless you're talking about yourself here (in which case, there was no wagon in the first place), I've done nothing of the sort.