Wait, screwed that post up in trimming, ignore it while I fix it up.
Okay.
Then you can be lynched for it.
Keep being flippant in the face of people's concerns while at the same time failing to address them. That's going to work out well for you.
You lynch people for trying to explain themselves? I lynch people for being scum.
Nope, that wasn't really MASSIVE CHAINSAWING. It was really all about you. Pandarsenic demanding you vote for him had nothing to do with ToonyMan, and that's the way it looked at the time.
So, again, how did you reach that conclusion? Asking "How did you not?" is not an answer.
See above. Max White, your reasons for voting Toony (and unvoting and then voting for him again...) are unconvincing. Do you ACTUALLY believe he's scum? I don't believe you believe that.
When I vote for Toony, he retaliates, with really abstract reasoning too. No really, he didn't believe I really, really feel strongly about my vote? That is the weakest reasoning I have ever seen that somebody has taken seriously.
He even went so far as to say that the votes on Toony were just a bandwagon
Lots of people have also bandwagon'd ONTO Toony.
He wanted to protect Toony, thinking that they were working together isn't unreasonable.
It also smells a lot like rolefishing.
As other people have pointed out, Max White, that question is blatant role-fishing.
Very well.
Well, if you're not going to fight it, then I have no reason to reconsider.
I intend to fight, but I don't think I will win. I ask if it would be appropriate to share any info, and you accuse me of role fishing. From here on any attempt to defend myself is no longer a townie explaining them self, but a scum mincing words to you.