Extend.Modface: Please prod IronyOwl. He hasn't been in the game for 60hrs.
ToonyMan:
Why exactly were you suspicious of Jim? Your vote was an RVS, and you pursued very little with that - you didn't even talk to him besides softballing him a few times at the very start, ending with "It was a reaction test which you passed with flying colours" (paraphrased) for a question.
That was one statement I made, not the whole picture. I felt like I was being very hard on him, not soft.
You could've at least come up with a good excuse instead of such a blatant lie, Toony.
Let's get a list of your interactions with him, shall we?
Your words have been bolded.
#1:
Jim, who do you think will be lynched today and for what reason?
#2:
You were scum in the previous version of this game. Did you learn anything from that? What did you learn?
Yes, thinking a little more before deciding.
What were you hoping to gain from that question? I can't see the value in asking me to predict the lynch at the very outset of the game, with quite literally nothing to go off of besides players' meta.
Why Jim, that question tells me a lot about you. I'm sure your response would change depending on your faction. In that way I can get ever closer to lynching the dopps this time.
#3:
<snip>
I'm sure it wouldn't, but, whatever, let's just say you're right.
How would my response change depending on what my alignment is?
I can't tell you that silly. I'm sure my vote speaks well though seeing as it's not moving much now.
#4:
Smells like bullshit to me.
Ask bad RVS question => Claim mysterious motives => Don't explain when asked
Perfect justification for a vote!
Have fun, ToonyMan.
That's your excuse for not being able to shake me, you have the most votes right now for a reason.
<snip>
#5
<snip>
That's your excuse for not being able to shake me, you have the most votes right now for a reason.
Are you serious?
Me having votes is a reason for a vote? And two votes from the RVS, even?
That's dumb. Duuuuuuuumb. Dummmmmmmmmmbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb. Completely unjustifiable.
This sounds suspiciously similar to the kinds of arguments and justifications for your votes during Day 2, before everything had to be rebooted.
That was a reaction statement, in which you passed with flying colors, scum Jim.
Behold #1, a bullshit leading question with no clear use besides that which you told us, and no reasonably derivable answer.
If you think this is hardballing, think again; this looks like you just threw out any old sentence with the obligatory RVS-vote, with no intention of using it. Tsk tsk tsk.
Now tell me:
how exactly were you planning on reading these answers when you got them? Looking at your reply in #2 it seems that this question is immensely profound, and damn, I'd love to learn from what you do. You're about to die, so I'm sure you won't miss it.
And number #3 is even more blatant bullshit: You've got this amazing scumtell on Jim that you absolutely refuse to share. What made you decide against it? What could have possessed you so badly that you'd kneecap your own scumhunt by secreting away such a
STRONG piece of evidence, leaving a vote that is completely unconvincing without it?
Psst: The answer is that you just don't have it, you sad excuse for scum.
#4 is a stupid statement that you quickly covered up with #5, possibly the worst excuse to grace this green earth. What were you even hoping to find this late, when you've supposedly already condemned him?
In fact, the only claim you have against Jim is "Town Jim would have done something different." What? Are you really that lost here?
It was better than nothing at that time in the game. There wasn't much else to go on and it works for me.
Oh? Your past self begs to differ, in #3 there.
This tells me two things:
One, that you really were bullshitting about both the question's usefulness and the tell that you "had".
Two, that you're a lying bitch. Only scum lies about things like this.
Now here, you say that your other suspicion is Max White. The whole thing just feels like a cover up to me - finding some reason for the lingering RV, then joining in a bandwagon (you had little prior interaction with Max as said below) on somebody just suspicious enough for nobody to go back and check.
I was genuinely suspicious of Max White and I still am. I also changed my vote when I did to prevent myself from dying.
Now,
why are you suspicious of Max? Do you actually have any original reasons?
Everything your questioning here is lies and more lies. It's completely contradictory to what I am doing.
I lie a whole lot less than you do, and would do it infinitely better than you, you dumb fuck.
___
I will address your case on Max White in another post.
Author
Topic: Paranormal 19.5 - Game Over! (Read 71475 times)