Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Jim Groovester]

Smells like bullshit to me.

Ask bad RVS question => Claim mysterious motives => Don't explain when asked

Perfect justification for a vote!

Have fun, ToonyMan.

[Max White]

Think0028: Seems Jim and ToonyMan have hit it right off. Do you think either of them are justified?

[Vector]

Dariush: Some of that tec looks pretty cool. What item(s) would you most want to have?
IronyOwl: Good to see you again, under slightly new conditions this time. What role do you think is to be feared the most on the first night?
ToonyMan: Pretty early to have a realy good idea about who is going to be lynched isn't it?

What, no vote?

Think0028: Seems Jim and ToonyMan have hit it right off. Do you think either of them are justified?

Max White, seems you're trying to pull people to take sides on an RVS spat without having to act in any particular direction yourself.  Scum, much?

[Think0028]

I think Jim's justified in calling it bullshit here. Toony, are you suggesting... hell, I can't even think of what you could be suggesting. Jim identified two players as generally noobish and one player as a common lurker, ergo he's scum? Do you have any justification for your vote that makes sense? At all?

[Max White]

What, no vote?

Not really, does this surprise you?

Max White, seems you're trying to pull people to take sides on an RVS spat without having to act in any particular direction yourself.  Scum, much?

I don't have a side in it myself, just wondering if anybody thought it was anything more then what you call a RVS spat. Is it anything more then that?

[Vector]

Yeah, it does surprise me, because questioning/pressuring without a vote in RVS tends to lower one's effectiveness.  You know, get people to jump and all that.

Avoiding altercations makes me think you've got some stake in keeping away from them.

I don't have a side in it myself, just wondering if anybody thought it was anything more then what you call a RVS spat. Is it anything more then that?

Think0028: Seems Jim and ToonyMan have hit it right off. Do you think either of them are justified?

I wouldn't call those the same questions.

The initial question asks Think0028 to figure out which side is more valid--to mentally align himself, as it were.  The secondary question asks if the two participants are "playing for serious."

As for the gravity of the spat, I imagine it's going to be going on for a pretty long time.  Toony invented tunneling.  If he's sunk his teeth into Jim, he'll more than likely be holding on for the rest of the game.

[Max White]

I wouldn't call those the same questions.

The initial question asks Think0028 to figure out which side is more valid--to mentally align himself, as it were.  The secondary question asks if the two participants are "playing for serious."

I'm sorry if you misinterpreted what I said, but I asked if either side was justified, allowing for him to support one, the other, both or neither, rather than asking what side was more justified, forcing somebody to take sides. I would expect you to understand the distinction.

As for the gravity of the spat, I imagine it's going to be going on for a pretty long time.  Toony invented tunneling.  If he's sunk his teeth into Jim, he'll more than likely be holding on for the rest of the game.

Ah, I see. Thank you.

[ToonyMan]

Smells like bullshit to me.
Ask bad RVS question => Claim mysterious motives => Don't explain when asked
Perfect justification for a vote!
Have fun, ToonyMan.

That's your excuse for not being able to shake me, you have the most votes right now for a reason.

I think Jim's justified in calling it bullshit here. Toony, are you suggesting... hell, I can't even think of what you could be suggesting. Jim identified two players as generally noobish and one player as a common lurker, ergo he's scum? Do you have any justification for your vote that makes sense? At all?

Yeah I do.  Town Jim would have did something different.  Can you prove that otherwise Think?

[Vector]

That's a fair explanation, but I'll be keeping an eye on you.  Unvote.

Dariush.

a. What specific, concrete things will you be doing to improve your play this game?

b. Of the various alien roles (i.e. non-Dopp, non-human), which would you prefer?  Why?

[Think0028]

First, unvote Jim.

Smells like bullshit to me.
Ask bad RVS question => Claim mysterious motives => Don't explain when asked
Perfect justification for a vote!
Have fun, ToonyMan.

That's your excuse for not being able to shake me, you have the most votes right now for a reason.

I think Jim's justified in calling it bullshit here. Toony, are you suggesting... hell, I can't even think of what you could be suggesting. Jim identified two players as generally noobish and one player as a common lurker, ergo he's scum? Do you have any justification for your vote that makes sense? At all?

Yeah I do.  Town Jim would have did something different.  Can you prove that otherwise Think?

Can you prove that Town Jim would have done something different? Burden of proof is on you here, Toony, and you're not living up to it.

ToonyMan, I want some justification as to why this is even evidence. How does this response prove he is scum? Why is this supposedly different from what Town Jim would do? How do you even know what Jim is thinking?

[Jim Groovester]

That's your excuse for not being able to shake me, you have the most votes right now for a reason.

Are you serious?

Me having votes is a reason for a vote? And two votes from the RVS, even?

That's dumb. Duuuuuuuumb. Dummmmmmmmmmbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb. Completely unjustifiable.

This sounds suspiciously similar to the kinds of arguments and justifications for your votes during Day 2, before everything had to be rebooted.

[ToonyMan]

First, unvote Jim.

Smells like bullshit to me.
Ask bad RVS question => Claim mysterious motives => Don't explain when asked
Perfect justification for a vote!
Have fun, ToonyMan.

That's your excuse for not being able to shake me, you have the most votes right now for a reason.

I think Jim's justified in calling it bullshit here. Toony, are you suggesting... hell, I can't even think of what you could be suggesting. Jim identified two players as generally noobish and one player as a common lurker, ergo he's scum? Do you have any justification for your vote that makes sense? At all?

Yeah I do.  Town Jim would have did something different.  Can you prove that otherwise Think?

Can you prove that Town Jim would have done something different? Burden of proof is on you here, Toony, and you're not living up to it.
ToonyMan, I want some justification as to why this is even evidence. How does this response prove he is scum? Why is this supposedly different from what Town Jim would do? How do you even know what Jim is thinking?

What I'm asking is that how do you know Jim is so adamantly town?  I feel town Jim would have did something different, however he responded in a way that is scummy to me.  That is what my vote is for.  You are being very scummy Think.

That's your excuse for not being able to shake me, you have the most votes right now for a reason.

Are you serious?
Me having votes is a reason for a vote? And two votes from the RVS, even?
That's dumb. Duuuuuuuumb. Dummmmmmmmmmbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb. Completely unjustifiable.
This sounds suspiciously similar to the kinds of arguments and justifications for your votes during Day 2, before everything had to be rebooted.

That was a reaction statement, in which you passed with flying colors, scum Jim.

[Think0028]

No, I don't currently think he's town, nor do I currently think he's scum. What I do think is that you're evading my questions. You've stated that you think he's scum because he responded in a scummy way. How is his response scummy?

[Jokerman-EXE]

Jim: who here would you want on your scumteam?

Toaster. Always Toaster.

I'd take Vector and Jokerman-EXE too.

I'm flattered.

Smells like bullshit to me.

Ask bad RVS question => Claim mysterious motives => Don't explain when asked

Perfect justification for a vote!

Have fun, ToonyMan.

Isn't this the Solifuge Method? The difference, I think, was that Solifuge actually had a reason for the way that he played.

[ToonyMan]

No, I don't currently think he's town, nor do I currently think he's scum. What I do think is that you're evading my questions. You've stated that you think he's scum because he responded in a scummy way. How is his response scummy?

Why are you defending him?  I don't feel like answering that question yet again.