I'd vote, but it's useless at this point in the game.
Toaster is my top scumpick right now, followed closely by Think0028.
I'm sure I'll get yelled at for saying this, but it appears to me that Think is slipping through without scrutiny. Sure, it looks like I'm doing it too, but he's posting simple accusations with little to no followup. In addition, his roleclaim is the easiest one to falsify.
Unless the scumteam has Irony and LNCP - which would mean LNCP is somewhat bussing Irony with his claim - then LNCP is telling the truth. I have no outstanding reason to disbelieve Irony's claim either; Dariush would have said he was lying if that was the case.
That leaves Think and Toaster as the two hardest roleclaims to prove. Vector can't be lying about her role, since Think was blocked. Irony and LNCP are easier to believe than you two.
Vector: No, they're honestly still being obtuse jackasses. They're convinced that I'm scum and refuse to give me any information, ignoring the fact that if I was scum then at this point I wouldn't have even bothered to ask for their knowledge - because at this point it can only help town. If we lose the game, then I'm sure they'll feel appropriately moronic.
Irony: If you're not going to vote Toaster, what will you do? It's the last day of LyLo.
I have to go to work now. Hopefully, town is going to wise up in the end. I won't be here for the end of the day, so good luck guys.
So, in the end, you've got two suspects: Toaster and Think, both for an unprovable claim and the latter for activelurking. Both points are from D3.
My, haven't you worked hard for this case. If you've been closely following this, I sure can't see it.
So, in conclusion: Go hang.
Ah, woops. My suspicions are on him for doing a fat load of nothing D1, and then his accuastion to Jim which rings extremely hollow to me. Also, his attitude to me suggests that he was extremely concerned with making sure everyone knew that he was 'extremely careful' with his vote, so he had a justification for doing jack shit D1 and the vast majority of D2. It feels like most of his time went towards building up his reputation rather than towards finding out answers.
"Lurking D1", a vague accusation with no example or reasoning, some more vague quasi-meta stuff to make the whole enterprise sound legit, and then an accusation that goes against everything you said earlier.
Think about it (hurr hurr): This is a guy that, according to you, loudly lurked off D1, bounced off a few weak cases and lurked some more to make himself seem "careful". Hardly the track record of a person working hard to keep up appearances, don't you think?
Welp. I was really hoping Jokerman would post by the time I got back on tonight, as I read his post as suggesting he was going to post again soon. But nope! No such luck! He continues to not be here, so I continue to believe he is scum.
And that's the point at which you try to push your other suspects, instead of sitting there like a passive ass.
As for my secondary suspects, I'd have to say LNCP and Irony are my secondary suspects.
Irony: I still find your D1 actions very suspicious. Your lack of actions, to be specific. You rode an RV on someone who hadn't posted yet all the way to day end, doing your best to dodge suspicion. D2, as has been pointed out already, you rode the flow of popular opinion heavily. Finally, your opening today disregards your previous scumpicks with no mention as to why. Your answer to Toaster is definitely unsatisfying to me. Why did you decide that Vector was now your highest priority target? Beyond just wanting to get information out of her, why did you pick her for your vote, and why hasn't your vote changed?
"Lurking D1" (again), sheeping, and new scumpicks (what?).
See, these reasons would be much better if you had some examples to give with them. But that'd be too much work, so you just hope they'll sound passable enough to not research and vague enough not to call out on.
Both of your secondary suspects have also retorted. But you don't care about that, right?
No. Why would you?