Prisoners do have it too good.
You think being locked up with a bunch of potentially dangerous people is good? To have no freedom? Even in maximum security prisons, it's the equivalent of being under your parent's thumb again, but instead of your parents it's the government.
They get huge benefeits, three square meals a day, special activity programs, et cetera.
I know of no such benefits, food is a human right, the activity programs are part of trying to rehabilitate them.
Prison is supposed to be undesirable to go to. That so much money is being spent to make the prisoners comfortable is counterproductive, costing more money per prisoner and reducing the deterrent effect, bringing more in.
The issue is that we have too many prisoners, not that prison is counterproductive.
Now, if we put the prisoners to work, it would go a long ways to recoup the costs, as well as letting them acquire some practical skills. But of course, that would be inhumane.
We do put prisoners to work, just not against their will. We call that slavery.
If this guy genuinely needed the healthcare and was not doing it just to be lazy, I have some sympathy for him.
No one is that determined to not work. Healthcare in the US will cost you an arm and a leg if you aren't wealthy.
However, jacking up taxes to pay for universal healthcare would mean he has less money on hand for other things, like food or a roof over his head.
We don't have to jack up taxes. We could just take away a small portion of the hundreds of billions of dollars the Department of Defence is bloated with and use that to pay for universal healthcare. Even if we did raise taxes for it, those taxes would be far more on the rich than a poor man like the one in this story.
Sorry if it is harsh, but we can't all have it easy.
We can, however, have it viable. You know how people are always going on about death panels? Well, guess what, death panels exist. But they aren't agents of the Federal Government, they're employees at health insurance compaines.
Prison must never be a free ride.
It is not, nor has it ever been, a free ride. You pay with your freedom and security.
Well my stance on the rec drugs is that we only still have alcohol and tobacco legal because politicians are hypocritical old men who like to drink and smoke, but for arbitrary reasons don't like something like marijuana.
Ring a ding ding, give this man a cigar.
To a limit, marijuana, ok fine, it isn't even possible to OD on it. Ecstasy? Ban that shit, people have been known to die from a single pill. Go on US, free up the legal system a little and give people some personal freedom.
People die from Ecstasy because they're idiots who don't know that it dehydrates you. As such, they don't drink any water and die. That's the risk they take in using it, and the consequences are on their head. People can die from a single night of drinking alcohol too, but they're also idiots for overdoing it. Hell, people regularly OD on cough syrup, but we don't ban that. The only thing I'd keep illegal is PCP, due to the potential of utter murderous insanity from it.