This is exactly why I was using those 'weasel words'. You cant discuss Islam without getting branded an Islamofobe even if it's something trivial. And you wonder why people only debate attack Christianity? What am I supposed to do to be able to have a mature discussion, start every post with Allah Ackbar?
Yeah, but have you noticed how you played the "I'm so downtrodden" card as a substitute to actually supporting your viewpoint with any kind of evidence? If you want to prove you're not an Islamophobe so badly, then
you need to provide support for your belief that they are the cause of antisemitism. Otherwise there's no way to tell that your view isn't based on simple fear or mistrust of Muslims.
As for "debate attack Christianity"... well, if you're talking about atheists in a Christian country, they're likely to attack the religion that is most likely to encroach on their lives and which most people will know about. I personally would only "attack" the Bible if someone starts claiming that the Bible is a credible historical source (thankfully this situation is fairly rare...).
I'm not sure where you get the idea that Muslims are untouchable though... I mean, those offering negative opinions include Geert Wilders in your country, and newspapers such as the Daily Mail here. There are also laws against Muslim religious practises in France (veils - although the type of veils they banned only covered around 200 people or so in the entire country, so it was clearly a symbolic anti-Muslim gesture) and Switzerland (banning Minarets).