Superfluous letter "u"s are superfluous.
English (UK
or US) is by no means the most logically phonetic language[1], as everyone knows, but "color" looks (to this reader, and YM
DV, I know) like it should be "kuhl-orr" where at least "colour" relates as "kuhl-eur". (How the first three letters give a "kuhl" sound, at least in my accent and most others I can currently think of, I have
no idea...)
Really, though, going well OT and we're entering Raymond Luxury Yacht[2]/Throat-Wobbler Mangrove territory...
More on-topic, but still adrift, the first time I read The Hunt For Red October (back in the mid 80s), I found it an excellent storyline (although I was younger, less discriminating[3] and it was the first Clancy I'd read, so can't say for sure I was a good judge of that fact) but I kept hitting apparent typos in the text. I only later realised that this was probably because it was either a direct US import that had lodged itself in my local library, or else the UK version hadn't been given as thorough an Anglicisation as most of the import-as-reprint books usually are. (The same problem did not occur with the likes of Red Storm Rising, Clear And Present Danger, Patriot Games, etc, etc, so it was probably suitably rectified in them, although the latter did get translated into a "Meh" movie[4].) A non-fiction example was a rather interesting book on self-sustaining space-stations (try saying that with a mouth full of crisps!), where things like "sulfur" (c.f. "sulphur"... actually phonetically identical, just 'having the wrong shape to it'!) and the old favourite of "aluminum" (yeah, I know that the version without the additional 'i' is the original word, but 'wrong' shape
and 'wrong' pronunciation...) caused mental jarring whenever encountered.
[1] And I'll admit that the US -ize is a more accurately spelling-to-pronounced relationship than the UK's "this is not American" -ise alternative... You'd be on much better ground, there.
[2] This Anglo word being probably a written mistake/mutation from the Dutch "Jaght"
[3] As a possible metric, I even lapped up Battlefield Earth (the film being laughably good, as in good to laugh at...) and even the ten volume (or, From The Author's Mouth, "dekalogy") Mission Earth set, by a certain infamous religion-founder... Reading current synopses of the plots from each, I really was not that discriminating in my literature, back then... Plus anyone else read the Survivor series? One man and his wife and children (and Russian lover, and enemies-becoming-friends, etc) surviving nuclear war and
then the next millennium or so of trans-human history, through a clinically-described Power Of The Gun, various examples of Invulnerable Plot Armour and just general all-round Apple Pie Americanism...
[4] And, to some extent, CaPD (tHfRO being more decently arranged, but PG also suffering in the theatrical version, though at least it made better use of the re-write), although I did quite like the fact that probably given the difficulty of replicating the "nightstalker being night-stalked" Chavez/Clark scene, mostly revolving around the former's internal thoughts while training in dark and featureless jungle/forest, there was an effective replacement scene that set up Chavez's skills in sniping and hiding (for another big diversion away from the book-plot, nearer the climax). But Clark didn't get any replacement CMOA at all, by my mind. In another book (I forget which one, momentarily, as it isn't really part of the main plot) he is shown having infiltrated the HQ tent of the US unit being used to test his infiltration skills,
and bumming a cigarette from one of the officers while they were still wondering how many more hours he would take to be spotted trying to get in. Sort of like the "cheeseburger"/whatever wrapper from the CaPD film, but only sort of.