Surely a more sensible route would be to abandon this arbitrary nonsense about fruits and vegetables and simply stipulate that school lunches must provide X% of a Y calorie diet's required nutrients (just run through the whole list) without exceeding Z calories, averaged over the course of a week? If you want to be fancy, add on a maximum fat and cholesterol limit as well, and maybe sugar and starch, too. Let individual schools pick whatever they like within those limits, knowing full well that all of them are going to pick the same options because one or two manufacturers will provide preconstructed meals that meet these requirements.
Give me 50 bucks and a couple hours with the internet, I'll even fill in the goddamn variables, Congress. Maybe if you're polite about it I'll do the fancy version, but this is a bargain either way you look at it.
I think the problem is, they did this but very superficially. Their meals must contain a certain amount of vegetables/fruit, bread, milk and so on. These are all healthy things required in a healthy diet, right?!
But then the bureaucracy will kick in. Potatoes are vegetables right? Well, fries are made from potatoes, so fries must be vegtables. There's your serving! Hey, we need to serve them milk? Well, apart from all of the sugar and cocoa we put in chocolate
milk, there's only milk in that! Another item checked off!
I posted
This link in the WTF thread, with my favourite quote:
Under a proposed rule, a vegetable serving of tomato paste would have to be a whole one half-cup serving, not two tablespoons, as it is now.
But, opponents of the rule argued, that would render a slice of pizza inedible. “It would basically be swimming in tomato sauce,” said Corey Henry, vice president of communications at the American Frozen Food Institute. “No school kid in his right mind would want to eat that.”
I feel this also requires the mandatory link to
Jamie Oliver's food revolution. I think episode one covers pretty much every problem that the system has.