Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 187 188 [189] 190 191 ... 298

Author Topic: Future of the Fortress  (Read 1204846 times)

EmeraldWind

  • Bay Watcher
  • Hey there, dollface...
    • View Profile
Re: Future of the Fortress
« Reply #2820 on: November 09, 2011, 10:16:46 pm »

STOP! HAMMER TIME!

Huzzah! The Hammerer is back. Now I will get to see him at work for first time!
Logged
We do not suffer from insanity. We enjoy every single bit of it.

Zesty

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Future of the Fortress
« Reply #2821 on: November 09, 2011, 10:29:30 pm »

Quote
and test out the new hammerer

That was the first thing I noticed too!

Spoiler (click to show/hide)
Logged
Cuius est solum, eius est usque ad coelum et ad inferos

monk12

  • Bay Watcher
  • Sorry, I AM a coyote
    • View Profile
Re: Future of the Fortress
« Reply #2822 on: November 09, 2011, 10:33:46 pm »

I hope the justice rewrite means we can spare useful dwarves the scourge of hammering without eschewing the position entirely.

And the potential for family heirlooms (noble-related or not) makes me smile.

Urist McDagger

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Future of the Fortress
« Reply #2823 on: November 09, 2011, 11:34:29 pm »

Speaking of family heirlooms, will adventurers ever be able to start with them?
Logged
You wouldn't rush Goya or Faulkner or Tarantino. Think about Toady as equal to those artists. And then deal with it.

MrWiggles

  • Bay Watcher
  • Doubt Everything
    • View Profile
Re: Future of the Fortress
« Reply #2824 on: November 09, 2011, 11:37:46 pm »

Speaking of family heirlooms, will adventurers ever be able to start with them?


In Dwarf Talk, Toady has spoken about your Adventure's children being able to use your old equipment. So in that way, yes.

Toady has spoken about taking over someone that exist in the world, with a preestablished history, but he hasn't spoken about it. But probably.
Logged
Doesn't like running from bears = clearly isn't an Eastern European
I'm Making a Mush! Navitas: City Limits ~ Inspired by Dresden Files and SCP.
http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=113699.msg3470055#msg3470055
http://www.tf2items.com/id/MisterWigggles666#

Urist McDagger

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Future of the Fortress
« Reply #2825 on: November 09, 2011, 11:50:21 pm »

Speaking of family heirlooms, will adventurers ever be able to start with them?


In Dwarf Talk, Toady has spoken about your Adventure's children being able to use your old equipment. So in that way, yes.
Wait, adventurers will be able to have families? Awesome!
How long will that feature last before it gets removed due to people beating their spouses to death with their kids' bodyparts?
« Last Edit: November 09, 2011, 11:52:18 pm by Urist McDagger »
Logged
You wouldn't rush Goya or Faulkner or Tarantino. Think about Toady as equal to those artists. And then deal with it.

Dsarker

  • Bay Watcher
  • Ἱησους Χριστος Θεου Υἱος Σωτηρ
    • View Profile
Re: Future of the Fortress
« Reply #2826 on: November 09, 2011, 11:54:50 pm »

Speaking of family heirlooms, will adventurers ever be able to start with them?


In Dwarf Talk, Toady has spoken about your Adventure's children being able to use your old equipment. So in that way, yes.
Wait, adventurers will be able to have families? Awesome!
How long will that feature last before it gets removed due to people beating their spouses to death with their kids' bodyparts?

Why would it get removed?
Logged
Quote from: NewsMuffin
Dsarker is the trolliest Catholic
Quote
[Dsarker is] a good for nothing troll.
You do not convince me. You rationalize your actions and because the result is favorable you become right.
"There are times, Sember, when I could believe your mother had a secret lover. Looking at you makes me wonder if it was one of my goats."

Urist McDagger

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Future of the Fortress
« Reply #2827 on: November 09, 2011, 11:58:56 pm »

For the same reason mermaid farming and the "incident" thread were both removed I'd imagine.
Logged
You wouldn't rush Goya or Faulkner or Tarantino. Think about Toady as equal to those artists. And then deal with it.

Willfor

  • Bay Watcher
  • The great magmaman adventurer. I do it for hugs.
    • View Profile
Re: Future of the Fortress
« Reply #2828 on: November 10, 2011, 12:00:32 am »

The ability to do it in the game was not removed, simply the discussion of it.
Logged
In the wells of livestock vans with shells and garden sands /
Iron mixed with oxygen as per the laws of chemistry and chance /
A shape was roughly human, it was only roughly human /
Apparition eyes / Apparition eyes / Knock, apparition, knock / Eyes, apparition eyes /

Urist McDagger

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Future of the Fortress
« Reply #2829 on: November 10, 2011, 12:13:25 am »

Wait, you can still butcher mermaids? O.o
Logged
You wouldn't rush Goya or Faulkner or Tarantino. Think about Toady as equal to those artists. And then deal with it.

Cruxador

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Future of the Fortress
« Reply #2830 on: November 10, 2011, 12:18:37 am »

Wait, you can still butcher mermaids? O.o
Of course. They're not worth some ungodly high price any more, though.
Logged

scriver

  • Bay Watcher
  • City streets ain't got much pity
    • View Profile
Re: Future of the Fortress
« Reply #2831 on: November 10, 2011, 12:51:37 am »

Well, I believe they're also sentient, so not without modding. It's against the dwarves morals.

Likewise, a character probably wouldn't be able to beat his wife to death with his childrens bodyparts without being shun by his community, at least in the final product.
Logged
Love, scriver~

Silophant

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Future of the Fortress
« Reply #2832 on: November 10, 2011, 01:44:17 am »

I'm thrilled by the implications of this new justice system. Tantrum? That's a hammerin'. Taking too many breaks? That's a hammerin'. Inappropriate mandate? Oh, you better believe that's a hammerin'.
Logged

Kogut

  • Bay Watcher
  • Next account: Bulwersator
    • View Profile
Re: Future of the Fortress
« Reply #2833 on: November 10, 2011, 02:39:42 am »

Well, I believe they're also sentient, so not without modding. It's against the dwarves morals.

Likewise, a character probably wouldn't be able to beat his wife to death with his childrens bodyparts without being shun by his community, at least in the final product.
Or maybe even intervention of angry goods.
Logged
The worst bug - 34.11 poll
Tired of going decades without goblin sieges? Try The Fortress Defense Mod
Kogut, the Bugfixes apostle of Bay12forum. Every posts he makes he preaches about the evil of Bugs.

Dsarker

  • Bay Watcher
  • Ἱησους Χριστος Θεου Υἱος Σωτηρ
    • View Profile
Re: Future of the Fortress
« Reply #2834 on: November 10, 2011, 02:54:05 am »

Well, I believe they're also sentient, so not without modding. It's against the dwarves morals.

Likewise, a character probably wouldn't be able to beat his wife to death with his childrens bodyparts without being shun by his community, at least in the final product.
Or maybe even intervention of angry goods.

Damned Goods, always getting angry. Can't they stay finished?
Logged
Quote from: NewsMuffin
Dsarker is the trolliest Catholic
Quote
[Dsarker is] a good for nothing troll.
You do not convince me. You rationalize your actions and because the result is favorable you become right.
"There are times, Sember, when I could believe your mother had a secret lover. Looking at you makes me wonder if it was one of my goats."
Pages: 1 ... 187 188 [189] 190 191 ... 298