Fuck. Gotta love the kind of work that sneaks up on you. At least I'm starting to get in shape, though.
LNCP: What do you need to hear before you cast a vote?
Nothing, now. I was solving my real-life problems first. They're still there, but it's not a crisis now.
My vote goes to
Pandar, for several reasons.
His only pick is Darvi. He has two reasons for his pick:
Lurking. This, quite frankly, is a bogus reason; it's something that can be applied to anyone here and is a weak reason to lynch anyone anyways without something else significant to base it upon. His play so far has been entirely reactive, and I don't like it one bit.
Not scumhunting properly. His claim was that Darvi didn't scumhunt others is bullshit, as is shown. This, in fact, applies more to him, seeing as he hasn't even made an attempt to question or scumhunt others. The "Not Scumhunting" reason just becomes less and less convincing the more you look at it; it was delivered only a few posts after Darvi began questioning, and was delivered very early on in the game too. This would have been a legitimate concern if it was further along in the game, but this one looks like Pandar's just reading off of a script.
It's as if he decided since the start of the game that he'd drive the wagon on Darvi - every single post (excepting some answers) is directed toward him in some fashion.
There's no attempt to find scum, it seems - all he does is try to drive a mislynch, scrabbling for half-assed reasons wherever he can find them. His participation in the game isn't so much a set of constructive posts as it is a long chain of snarky remarks.
Author
Topic: Game Over, park staff win! (Read 14589 times)