Could the same be said of genetic modification and cybernetics once those are available? When does the dedication and sacrifice no longer impress us?
I think it will always impress us.
They'd've replaced his whole body if it would've improved performance. If that's how you judge a man -- by performance -- then eventually it's not about people but upgrades, versions, functionality...
[/quote]
I'm afraid my stupid is showing because I don't see it. Athletic excellence does have a side that prizes results, but the side I'm talking about is the one about sacrifice, even if a person doesn't have the physical fortitude to endure a marathon race, this person's simple dedication and sacrifice of time and pain to this aim is still admirable. I guess when you put the two together, you somehow end up with the winning hand.
I think ideally, the best athlete is the one that sacrifices the most, not just there because he/she has the physical disposition for competing.
Why should the whole leading rank of athletes slow down and limit themselves just for this individual?
Huh sorry, I couldn't hear you over the money I am spending for my athlete to win. What was that? You don't have enough money to pay for the modifications? well I guess you can just be destitute or something.
You are aware that quite a lot of the best athletes have the best coaches, training equipment and areas, and especially the means to represent themselves right? It's true that this sort of thing will increase if drugs became the norm, but it seems a little hypocritical to see the money side of doping and turn a blind eye to the performance money can buy elsewhere.