Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[IronyOwl]

Oh god, not 100.

[monk12]

Poor Toaster

[IronyOwl]

Just saw 89. Immediately thought of this.

73 what.

67 oh god. If only Ochita were more deranged. I should start adding that as a feature to my games, except from what I hear most people would be far more lenient and kind than me.

Nowwwwwww I see why poor Toaster. That's what led me to reading this whole thing. YES FROM THE BOTTOM UP WHAT OF IT.

I'm guessing I'd get 62 if I'd read or played in Speedograd.

55 sounds hilarious and like it should be combined with 61 and at all times, depending on how far outside Mario you go for it.

45, lol.

34-37 are... interesting. I swear some of these sound like mechanics I should use as core features of a game. Narrative RTD maybe? Or maybe Jackass Fantasy Tropes RTD. Parody-ish except I tend to despise parodies, this would just be a world where everyone's a jackass. Maybe that's just a parody I don't hate or that isn't trying too hard or that has substance beyond HAHA REMEMBER WHEN THIS HAPPENS GUYS?, I don't know.


So yes, I approve of further randomizing your RTD which I should probably join anyway but which has like eight people on the waitlist already and I haven't been following.

[SeriousConcentrate]

Irony, I've been in it the entire time and I have no clue at all what's going on. Every character but mine and I think Theros's (whoever is playing Joe the Toad, anyway) has their own plotline to follow separate from what I guess is the main plot, so you wouldn't be out of place.

[ExKirby]

I think we can only agree that we need more RTDs like freeform's.

[Tiruin]

I think we can only agree that we need more RTDs like freeform's.

Meaning, more Plot RTDs which are free enough to live on their own. Minus the art (Because epic art is unmatched...), this board needs more RTDs with the holistic essence of a real game. Not saying its lacking right now, but its something which is a recurring principle.

[Tarran]

I think we can only agree that we need more RTDs like freeform's.

Meaning, more Plot RTDs which are free enough to live on their own.

Which means what, exactly?

[Tiruin]

Meaning as the GM, you don't twist yourself into dead ends.

[Tarran]

I'm sorry, but your definition is still too vague to me.

[Mr.Zero]

I'm sorry, but your definition is still too vague to me.

yeah that. I'd like to know also what you mean.

[freeformschooler]

Dunno what Tiruin means, but I think every GM should just do what works for them

[Tsuchigumo550]

I think what he's getting at is putting players in a setting and letting them run free

[SeriousConcentrate]

We could probably debate for days what Tir meant; it's likely that the meaning just didn't translate to English very well. I'll proceed under the assumption the statement meant RTDs based on existing things but not following them exactly, like MKW is.

[BlasterKyubey210]

Mmm, is there really a good balance between Player Cap and Lehtality?

Something's bugging me and I'm not sure what you think: In my RtD Game (Super Robot Taisen RtD Adventure Reboot), I'm debating between boosting the cap up to 8, and making Pilot Slaying more likely... although making luck effects reduced for more players seems nice.

[Harry Baldman]

Mmm, is there really a good balance between Player Cap and Lehtality?

Something's bugging me and I'm not sure what you think: In my RtD Game (Super Robot Taisen RtD Adventure Reboot), I'm debating between boosting the cap up to 8, and making Pilot Slaying more likely... although making luck effects reduced for more players seems nice.

Don't kill players left and right if you have character development. That's kind of important. Have a real possibility of death for players, but don't go overboard.

Also, only add more players if you know you can handle it. I wouldn't advise having more than 6 players if you have an RTD that requires all of them to post an action for a turn to commence.