Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Poll

What one do you prefer for adventure mode?

Current version.
- 33 (89.2%)
40d
- 4 (10.8%)

Total Members Voted: 37


Author Topic: 40d or the current version for adventuring?  (Read 2286 times)

Angel Of Death

  • Bay Watcher
  • Karl Groucho?
    • View Profile
40d or the current version for adventuring?
« on: March 29, 2011, 01:59:11 am »
I prefer 40d. I once got FALCAWN PAWUNCHED by an elf in 40d.
« Last Edit: March 29, 2011, 07:22:20 am by Angel Of Death »
Logged
99 percent of internet users add useless, pulled out of arse statistics to their sig. If you are the 1%, please, for the love of Armok, don't put any useless shit like this in your sig.
Hidden signature messages are fun!

Dutchling

  • Bay Watcher
  • Ridin' with Biden
    • View Profile
Re: 40d or the current version for adventuring?
« Reply #1 on: March 29, 2011, 10:32:26 am »
Aimed Attacks

(I still have to get my first quest :P, so that's all I know )
Logged

Funk

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: 40d or the current version for adventuring?
« Reply #2 on: March 29, 2011, 01:40:41 pm »
aiming? bah a 40d Warrior needs no such thing when you can send your foes in to the sky.
that and organ blending spears.

still it was nice to find a quest some times.
Logged
Agree, plus that's about the LAST thing *I* want to see from this kind of game - author spending valuable development time on useless graphics.

Unofficial slogan of Bay 12 Games.  

Death to the false emperor a warhammer40k SG

gumball135

  • Bay Watcher
  • [ROBOTS]
    • View Profile
Re: 40d or the current version for adventuring?
« Reply #3 on: March 29, 2011, 01:46:36 pm »
40d is currently slightly more stable than the the latest release, which would be my only reason for picking it. Not for long, though, at the rate Toady is wading through these bugs. I think the new features are really too big a positive to give up for a slightly more stable a release, though.
Logged
Quote from: Jingles on February 27, 2011, 07:09:32 am
You could start a zoo and end up with a natural history museum, I'm sure no one would mind.

Tarran

  • Bay Watcher
  • Kind of back, but for how long?!
    • View Profile
Re: 40d or the current version for adventuring?
« Reply #4 on: March 29, 2011, 01:49:58 pm »
Current version. Aimed combat makes the game more strategic rather then just hitting the direction keys again and again.
Logged
Quote from: Phantom
Unknown to most but the insane and the mystics, Tarran is actually Earth itself, as Earth is sentient like that planet in Avatar. Originally Earth used names such as Terra on the internet, but to protect it's identity it changed letters, now becoming the Tarran you know today.
Quote from: Ze Spy
Tarran has the "Tarran Bug", a bug which causes the affected character to repeatedly hit teammates while dual-wielding instead of whatever the hell he is shooting at.

JohnnyDigs

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: 40d or the current version for adventuring?
« Reply #5 on: March 29, 2011, 06:18:51 pm »
I got into this game by watching some guy named Jeff do a lets play on youtube of adventure mode. I think it was 40d, don't know. That dude was going around massacring elven villages, raiding goblin towers to strangle goblin children with their own loincloths, visiting and getting lost in dwarven mountain homes. It was funny when he was able to gather up a group of henchmen that happened to all be related to each other in some way. I don't see any of that in the current adventure mode. Everyone has no family to speak off and civilizations besides humans don't exist. :-\
Logged

darkflagrance

  • Bay Watcher
  • Carry on, carry on
    • View Profile
Re: 40d or the current version for adventuring?
« Reply #6 on: March 29, 2011, 06:34:44 pm »
Adventure mode in the current version was actually quite good way back in ~.18, when adventure reactions were in but sprawl was not, and placeholder mountainhomes and forest retreats still existed. There's also something to be said for the infinite flow of reinforcements/enemies to murder in castles in the current version.
Logged
...as if nothing really matters...
   
The Legend of Tholtig Cryptbrain: 8000 dead elves and a cyclops

Tired of going decades without goblin sieges? Try The Fortress Defense Mod

snpaa

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: 40d or the current version for adventuring?
« Reply #7 on: March 29, 2011, 06:35:41 pm »
the current version just seems bland to me, 40d was just more exciting in my opinion,only thing i dont like in 40d is that it take ages to find someone who will give you a quest.
Logged

Ale and Axes

  • Bay Watcher
  • Chug - Swipe - Cheer
    • View Profile
Re: 40d or the current version for adventuring?
« Reply #8 on: March 29, 2011, 06:59:51 pm »
Both 40d and 31.x Adventure modes are sandboxes for messing around in at the moment, and for that I prefer 31.x's combat system over the more complete world of 40d. Hopefully it shouldn't be long before Dwarf, Elf and Goblin settlements come back anyway.
Logged

minno

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: 40d or the current version for adventuring?
« Reply #9 on: March 29, 2011, 07:40:55 pm »
Quote from: darkflagrance on March 29, 2011, 06:34:44 pm
Adventure mode in the current version was actually quite good way back in ~.18, when adventure reactions were in but sprawl was not, and placeholder mountainhomes and forest retreats still existed. There's also something to be said for the infinite flow of reinforcements/enemies to murder in castles in the current version.

You have the version number wrong.  31.12 was the last version that didn't have sprawl, but it didn't have aimed attacks either.  I'm going to stick with 31.18, which has aimed attacks, until Toady finishes the caravan arc.
Logged

Angel Of Death

  • Bay Watcher
  • Karl Groucho?
    • View Profile
Re: 40d or the current version for adventuring?
« Reply #10 on: March 29, 2011, 10:45:24 pm »
Does anybody know if the current version will eventually become like 40d? You know, being able to strangle with objects again, taverns, towns, dwarfs with proper cities...
Logged
99 percent of internet users add useless, pulled out of arse statistics to their sig. If you are the 1%, please, for the love of Armok, don't put any useless shit like this in your sig.
Hidden signature messages are fun!

Gorm

  • Bay Watcher
  • not related to Gorm of Denmark
    • View Profile
Re: 40d or the current version for adventuring?
« Reply #11 on: March 29, 2011, 11:39:20 pm »
Quote from: Angel Of Death on March 29, 2011, 10:45:24 pm
Does anybody know if the current version will eventually become like 40d? You know, being able to strangle with objects again, taverns, towns, dwarfs with proper cities...
No, it wont become like 40d. It will eventually become much better. Better towns and dwarven cities and everything should all come within the next few months (or years if we're unlucky). It's all planned but will take some time.
Logged
Quote from: plynxis on November 10, 2010, 06:15:33 am
Quote from: rephikul on November 10, 2010, 05:29:34 am
As dwarves slowly lose their stats over time it's natural for them to get fatter as they age because there's no activities to train healing rate.
so dwarves that die of old age in DF dont get shriveled and weak, but huge round masses of meat and fat that explode spectacularly upon their final birthday?

gumball135

  • Bay Watcher
  • [ROBOTS]
    • View Profile
Re: 40d or the current version for adventuring?
« Reply #12 on: March 30, 2011, 01:40:33 pm »
Check up the to-do list on the main DF page for a detailed look at planned features.
http://www.bay12games.com/dwarves/dev.html
By the looks of things, we should be seeing a return to the level of detail we were at in 40d within 3-4 biggish releases. Assuming Toady doesn't decide to work on some different features in between the Caravan Arc releases.
Logged
Quote from: Jingles on February 27, 2011, 07:09:32 am
You could start a zoo and end up with a natural history museum, I'm sure no one would mind.

Chilton

  • Bay Watcher
  • Armok Cultist - Calligrapher
    • View Profile
Re: 40d or the current version for adventuring?
« Reply #13 on: March 31, 2011, 08:57:05 pm »
I prefer the current version...




Wait, cant you gen out a world in 40d, then use it in the current?
Logged
I Like To Think Of Myself As An Artist - I Create Masterpieces With My Tools Of Trade.

Tarran

  • Bay Watcher
  • Kind of back, but for how long?!
    • View Profile
Re: 40d or the current version for adventuring?
« Reply #14 on: March 31, 2011, 09:00:05 pm »
Quote from: Chilton on March 31, 2011, 08:57:05 pm
Wait, cant you gen out a world in 40d, then use it in the current?
Although I haven't tested it, I highly, highly, HIGHLY doubt it. A LOT of stuff has changed since 40d.
Logged
Quote from: Phantom
Unknown to most but the insane and the mystics, Tarran is actually Earth itself, as Earth is sentient like that planet in Avatar. Originally Earth used names such as Terra on the internet, but to protect it's identity it changed letters, now becoming the Tarran you know today.
Quote from: Ze Spy
Tarran has the "Tarran Bug", a bug which causes the affected character to repeatedly hit teammates while dual-wielding instead of whatever the hell he is shooting at.