Unvote.
Wouldn't that be more reason to determine if we're scum and NOT less, Zrk2?
Defensive much,
Pandar?
Zrk2, Who here would you be the most wary of trying to scumhunt?
Pandar or Mr. Person, both are among the better players on the forum, and I do not know several of the others playing in this game. Therefore if I were scum I would see them as the biggest threat.
You didn't answer the question. I did not ask who you think would be biggest threat to you as scum, I asked which person here you think you would have the most issues scum hunting if that person was scum.
Ah, I misunderstood then, the person I would be most wary of trying to scumhunt would probably be the same, as everyone else is either new, or unknown to me. Mr. Person usually puts on a decent enough scumhunt, and I don't remember off the top of my head any games I have been in where Pandar was scum.
3rd parties are almost always scum. Your question is invalid.
Please, elucidate. This seems defensive and evasive, why can't you provide an answer while pointing out the 'flaws' in the question?
Probably Mafia, barring the possibility of a Cult. They biggest threat is the enemy achieving a majority.
Brilliant deduction is brilliant. Bravo.
What do you mean by made suspicious by someone before their disappearance ?
Good question. By "made suspicious by someone," I mean that a player made a strong accusation against another player that revealed a hole in their logic, to which the second player responded by not posting in the game's thread for a long period of time, if not for the rest of the game.
Wouldn't that tunnel you into attacking only lurkers ? If someone is dodging question's this way won't it be better to concentrate on someone else in the meantime ?
Shouldn't one instead call them out on dodging questions and provide a list of the questions they have dodged? Make it obvious to everyone that they are dodging, and draw more attention down on them?
Pandar, why are you being evasive? How would you choose who you would kill as a SK?