Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[NativeForeigner]

Native, how would you feel about claiming as a PGO?

I feel it wouldn't be a surprise to anyone who's been following this game. I've been a PGO for all but one round and it's kept the King from winning three times.

[IronyOwl]

I feel it wouldn't be a surprise to anyone who's been following this game. I've been a PGO for all but one round and it's kept the King from winning three times.

I meant as a tactical decision- assuming nobody had any particular expectations about your role, what would you feel the advantages and disadvantages to be, and how would they ultimately balance out?

[NativeForeigner]

I feel it wouldn't be a surprise to anyone who's been following this game. I've been a PGO for all but one round and it's kept the King from winning three times.

I meant as a tactical decision- assuming nobody had any particular expectations about your role, what would you feel the advantages and disadvantages to be, and how would they ultimately balance out?

Oooh. Well it would definitely put you at risk, being uninspectable is kind of a big deal and makes you suspect, but if the other players have a strong daygame, a probably-town PGO can be an asset to town. I feel it would be better to claim before N1 to avoid an accidental death. Unless, of course, your King and want that death.

[webadict]

Vote Count
----------------------------
lordnincompoop - Toaster,
Darvi - Dariush,
Toaster -
Pandarsenic - Darvi,
Dariush - Pandarsenic, NativeForeigner,
IronyOwl -
NativeForeigner - lordnincompoop, IronyOwl,

Not Voting -

4 To Hammer. Day Ends Wednesday 9 PM Central.

[lordnincompoop]

NativeForeigner, do I not exist? Mind answering that question?

[Dariush]

Dariush: Is there a reason you're asking about the anti-lurk policy?

Plain curiosity. Also I want to know how worried I should be about missing the deadline by a few minutes.

WUBAAAAAAAAA,

Modface, is the antilurk system still up? If yes, does an unvote count as a vote in terms of lurking?

DAAAAAAAARVIIIIIIIII,

Darvi, if you were scum with roleblocking and you somehow learned the identites of a cop, a doctor and a roleblocker, whom would you choose to roleblock first?

[NativeForeigner]

Native, how would you deal with an Unlynchable and/or an Unkillable of both alignments?

For either one I would want anyone with an inspect to have at them. If for whatever reason the results were inconclusive, it would boil down to day game to figure out whether or not they're scum. Someone who is unlynchable is a liability and should probably be NKed for safety.

Pandar: Been busy ensuring my future financial aid, so yeah.

Dariush: Is there a reason you're asking about the anti-lurk policy?

Obviously not, since I kind of already answered it.

[Toaster]

Extend.  Day ends tonight and we've gotten barely anywhere.

LNCP:  Why would we need to "deal with" townies?

"Deal with" read as "Take into account", but in a more active sense. An example would have been IronyOwl's plan R11.

See, I'm thinking that was more of a Freudian slip.  Deal with, as in you want to get rid of townies.  And who wants to get rid of townies?


Darvi:  Not good at doc as in I've never saved anyone as a protective role.

It's near the end of the day and most of these votes look random.   What fishiness do you think is going on?


Pandar:  What color is my shirt?

[Pandarsenic]

Oh jesus what why is the day ending already extend.

Toaster: Not red, I hope.

Should we just skip to massclaiming and trying to solve the game or should we go a night first?

[lordnincompoop]

If it's ending today, Extend.

[Toaster]

Toaster: Not red, I hope.

Garnet, but that's basically red.  Die, scum!

[lordnincompoop]

LNCP:  Why would we need to "deal with" townies?

"Deal with" read as "Take into account", but in a more active sense. An example would have been IronyOwl's plan R11.

See, I'm thinking that was more of a Freudian slip.  Deal with, as in you want to get rid of townies.  And who wants to get rid of townies?

That's pretty weak, but I guess there isn't much to go on yet.

The obvious answer to that would be "scum".

Toaster: Not red, I hope.

Garnet, but that's basically red.  Die, scum!

No vote?

Native: Right, fair enough.

[Toaster]

LNCP:  Right, no vote.  If it wasn't obvious, that was not serious.  I'm content with my vote on you for now.

Why?  I've got almost nothing, but you're faintly pinging on my scumdar.  Pretty much all gut at this point, but it's all I have.

[IronyOwl]

Pandar, what's your scumminess threshold for vigging someone? What about roleblocking? Each end of a redirection?

[NativeForeigner]

Extend

Toaster: If you were King and had a suspicious-sounding role or a role that would cause uneasiness among townies, would you risk lying about your role or would you risk claiming truthfully?