1. If scum were involved in the bandwagon, then I didn't want them to think it was unnoticed. If they weren't, I didn't want them thinking they could slip in on it. If it was only town and they didn't realize, then I wanted to point it out. I still don't see how that's actually scummy at all, so if you could explain that I would be grateful.
There's no apparent way it leads to catching scum. Letting scum know they can't hop on the bandwagon without being noticed, in fact, sounds like the
opposite of that, because you're giving them advance warning.
Perhaps more importantly, you hardly
did anything with it. You didn't make any effort to
find out if some of bandwagon was scum, for instance, you just pointed at it and then left.
2. I was answering someone's (don't recall who) question about how I was apparently "waiting for people's opinions" before voting Mr.Person, and then the post you quoted was my explanation. I didn't think he was scummy until after, but I felt like conversing with him and pointing out a few things while I was there would stimulate conversation. Which uh, doesn't seem to be working too hot. I feel like I'm only talking to the same three people. 
Right, but you said Person's semi-defense of the bandwagon would draw out scum. I'm curious how exactly you thought that would work.
Also, you're only talking to the same three people because you're only talking to the three people who jumped on you.
3. So you're going to say that I'm still being passive and not scumhunting, despite the fact that I've leveled accusations against my list of suspicions while others (Darvi) have simply voted me without reasons? Because I'm pretty sure that's being hypocritical. I also explained why the attacks on me were bullshit, and saying "Oh you were freaking out" is retarded because I've explained multiple times why their votes were bullshit and cause for alarm.
Your "list of suspicions" is the list of people attacking you, full stop. Doing nothing but OMGUSing is not really scumhunting.
As for Darvi, the word you're looking for is "inconsistent." It's only hypocritical if
I'm doing it.
In any case, Darvi had a semi-decent excuse, so the lurking didn't bother me. You're correct that he hasn't exactly been a star player, but that's not especially unusual this game.
As for the attacks, no. You've said "That's not scummy, how is that scummy?" to most of them, but you haven't really provided good reasons for your wanton passiveness and OMGUSing. Case in point, "Their attacks are bullshit" is not a cause for
alarm, at least for a townie.
4. Lead by example? I think I have the most posts over the last three days, and you've been gone (granted it was the weekend, but still). So explain what that's supposed to mean.
Really? Please provide who your suspects were prior to the bandwagon incident; if you've had the most posts (by which I assume you mean
content), you should have no trouble pointing to the fruits of said labor.
In any case, you're complaining about there not being enough conversation, but doing nothing to start any. You're responding to attacks against you, yes, but you're not starting anything new, investigating anything unbidden, or otherwise making the game livelier; you're simply stating that you'd like it to be.
NativeForeigner, you haven't voted yet. Who are you going to?
To avoid a no lynch I'll unvote Zrk2 and vote Mr.Person.
Why do you prefer Person to Zrk2? What's wrong with a Joker lynch?
Author
Topic: Why Would You Do That?: A Mafia Misadventure: Game Over, nobody wins >:I (Read 189419 times)