Sir Bayer, in case you missed it, I opened voting on you, but moved it over to Org for his playing like a bad imitation of himself. You didn't seem to warrant it, but you seem to be trying to draw votes onto you, to take the pressure off Org.
How do you know what Org plays like?And what does that have to do with anything? I really don't much care about your vote on me, I'm interested in the vote on Org.
Because clearly random voting Org is a policy lynch on him. Hell, I never said policy lynch at all.
SirBayer, why are you defending Org's... Orgness?
Because we call it Orgness. It's like saying Pandarsenic making puns is a scumtell. Yeah, it's annoying. Yeah, it's not helpful. But it doesn't actually mean much, in context.
I'll grant that the only way to catch scum-Org is a policy lynch, but I won't stand behind this right now. It's a bad idea and it won't end well. I am fairly willing to put my bet on a useless town-Org.
(Of course having said that he'll be scum.)
So wait, you see Org doing what you call nulltells, so you assume he's town? That makes no sense at all. You're also not willing to scumhunt him to figure this out. You're also passive about it.
I find it scummy that you both vote Org with a three-minute interval.
But yeah.
Well, yeah. When people jump on the same guy like that, with basically the exact same reasoning, it's often called a bandwagon. Which is scummy.
Not really. Bandwagoning is about voting without any reasoning at all OR trying to ride on someone else's reasoning. But lemme put it this way. What Org is doing is so unnacceptable that people voting him should be a given. Sure, some people are being a touch lazy about the reasoning and you're more than welcome to question them about it. Of course, I notice you've neglected to scumhunt everyone who's wagoned and are only going after one guy. This is a very odd time to tunnel considering you've got a myriad of targets.
Okay, let's look at why that makes no sense.
When's the last time you've legitimately seen a bandwagon without reasoning? Without
any reasoning at all? That never happens, because it's stupid and obvious. No, you use someone else's reasoning. Like Zrk2 did. That's why I voted him.
As for refusing to target other people, nothing else stood out to me. What else can I say?
So then who's scummier? The guy who's spouting random nonsense or the guy who's buddying? And yet your vote is where it is - on Org. Haven't even FoS'd me. Just defended yourself.
Who's scummier? The defender of another or the defender of himself?
So you're well aware that you're buddying Org. Hell, you're even chainsaw defending him. Now why might that be? You make no effort to tell Org to shape up or anything! And I'd like to remind you that all you've said about Org is that he's spouting nulltells. So I see no reason you should be defending him except that you're scum.
Unvote, vote SirBayer
I can't even remember what a chainsaw defense is. I guess... attacking somebody to protect them?
Why would I tell Org to shape up? We've been doing that for years now and
it doesn't make a difference.And if he's spouting nulltells, but there's about to
be a lynch on him, why in the
name of all that is good and holy would I let that go through? Do
you want us to waste our first day lynch? If he's town, and I think he is,
that's two townies in the first night. If we don't have any real tells on him, why would I just leave it alone?
V
THIS IS THE IMPORTANT PART V
Also I'm not exactly sure why you're reacting when
I never accused you. Jumpy, a bit? Your random vote is all fine and good. But you certainly seem to feel like you've done something wrong, or at least like I'm accusing you of such a thing. Now review that post. Did I ever say
anything about you or your vote, yet again? The answer's no.
So,
Mr. Person, what's your deal?
Author
Topic: Why Would You Do That?: A Mafia Misadventure: Game Over, nobody wins >:I (Read 188720 times)