Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 [2] 3

Author Topic: DF IRC  (Read 4362 times)

Capntastic

  • Bay Watcher
  • Greetings, mortals!
    • View Profile
    • A review and literature weblog I never update
Re: DF IRC
« Reply #15 on: March 04, 2011, 03:19:24 am »

Please stop getting defensive and acting as if I'm calling for the eradication the IRC, I've stated my own personal issues with them and didn't intend for 3 people to immediately jump down my throat; and beyond that I'm merely relaying what I've been told.  Since I'm not Toady and don't get Toady's emails, I can't lend any specific information with regards to whatever issues he was dealing with.   I just recall one of our discussions like 6 months ago turning to the IRC and he mentioned something along the lines of not really wanting to deal with it on official terms any longer. 


Edit:  Gonna stop posting in this thread because no matter what I say G-Flex is just going to say I'm 'mad' and 'trying to get even' or whatever.   Makes it hard to have a discussion.
« Last Edit: March 04, 2011, 03:31:20 am by Capntastic »
Logged

Captain Mayday

  • Bay Watcher
  • A Special Kind of Terrible
    • View Profile
Re: DF IRC
« Reply #16 on: March 04, 2011, 03:25:17 am »

Please stop getting defensive and acting as if I'm calling for the eradication the IRC, I've stated my own personal issues with them and didn't intend for 3 people to immediately jump down my throat; and beyond that I'm merely relaying what I've been told.  Since I'm not Toady and don't get Toady's emails, I can't lend any specific information with regards to whatever issues he was dealing with.   I just recall one of our discussions like 6 months ago turning to the IRC and he mentioned something along the lines of not really wanting to deal with it on official terms any longer.

I didn't mean to come off as jumping down your throat, so to speak. I was just trying to correct beliefs that you had about why you were not given ops that were simply untrue.
Logged
Why not join us on IRC? irc.newnet.net #bay12games

G-Flex

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: DF IRC
« Reply #17 on: March 04, 2011, 03:28:34 am »

Please stop getting defensive and acting as if I'm calling for the eradication the IRC, I've stated my own personal issues with them

You showed up and said the IRC was "full of drama and nonsense" with nothing to back it up except that you got mad because you weren't made an op again after asking once after not being there for a long time.

I apologize if I seem too personally offended or something, but in addition to me normally talking like this, I guess I am a little offended that you would insult us like that because of what seems to be vague second-hand rumors on your part.
Logged
There are 2 types of people in the world: Those who understand hexadecimal, and those who don't.
Visit the #Bay12Games IRC channel on NewNet
== Human Renovation: My Deus Ex mod/fan patch (v1.30, updated 5/31/2012) ==

MarcAFK

  • Bay Watcher
  • [INSANITY INTENSIFIES]
    • View Profile
Re: DF IRC
« Reply #18 on: March 04, 2011, 03:31:38 am »

I don't mean to troll but this whole thread seems rather dramatic, i would simpathise with any attempt toady makes to distance himself from this.
That said i'm a huge IRC addict and i wish i had known earlier about any official or semi official DF channel :/
Logged
They're nearly as bad as badgers. Build a couple of anti-buzzard SAM sites marksdwarf towers and your fortress will look like Baghdad in 2003 from all the aerial bolt spam. You waste a lot of ammo and everything is covered in unslightly exploded buzzard bits and broken bolts.

Captain Mayday

  • Bay Watcher
  • A Special Kind of Terrible
    • View Profile
Re: DF IRC
« Reply #19 on: March 04, 2011, 03:35:38 am »

I don't mean to troll but this whole thread seems rather dramatic, i would simpathise with any attempt toady makes to distance himself from this.
That said i'm a huge IRC addict and i wish i had known earlier about any official or semi official DF channel :/

In all fairness, it was a response to somebody hurling misguided opinions at a long standing community, and one that I administer. You'd be quite welcome to join us, if you want.
Logged
Why not join us on IRC? irc.newnet.net #bay12games

G-Flex

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: DF IRC
« Reply #20 on: March 04, 2011, 03:36:34 am »

I don't mean to troll but this whole thread seems rather dramatic, i would simpathise with any attempt toady makes to distance himself from this.

It's dramatic because we've had to deal with this whole official-unofficial-official bait-and-switch thing before, and (at least this time) we have no idea why it's happening and feel a little jaded that we weren't approached about it, especially since the channel has actually been really calm for quite a while now, and hasn't even required much active moderation. It's almost entirely drama-free.

Probably seems worse that there are a few of us responding at once, too, but that's not any sort of concerted effort or anything.

Quote
That said i'm a huge IRC addict and i wish i had known earlier about any official or semi official DF channel :/

It still exists, and we're still getting new faces, especially when new versions are released, so no need to feel shy.
Logged
There are 2 types of people in the world: Those who understand hexadecimal, and those who don't.
Visit the #Bay12Games IRC channel on NewNet
== Human Renovation: My Deus Ex mod/fan patch (v1.30, updated 5/31/2012) ==

Anticheese

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: DF IRC
« Reply #21 on: March 04, 2011, 03:48:45 am »

Thirding this. Its always great to see new people around
Logged
Why not join us on IRC? irc.newnet.net #bay12games

Trippin

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: DF IRC
« Reply #22 on: March 04, 2011, 04:09:59 am »

OH GOD WHAT HAVE I DONE!? :o
Logged
I imagine that every fortress will eventually become a roiling mass of naked, muddy beardballs so fat they have to travel by rolling around.

MrWiggles

  • Bay Watcher
  • Doubt Everything
    • View Profile
Re: DF IRC
« Reply #23 on: March 04, 2011, 04:19:46 am »

OH GOD WHAT HAVE I DONE!? :o

Yes, this is all your fault, and you should feel bad for it.
Logged
Doesn't like running from bears = clearly isn't an Eastern European
I'm Making a Mush! Navitas: City Limits ~ Inspired by Dresden Files and SCP.
http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=113699.msg3470055#msg3470055
http://www.tf2items.com/id/MisterWigggles666#

Shadowlord

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: DF IRC
« Reply #24 on: March 04, 2011, 02:21:30 pm »

What sorts of complaints? If there have been complaints regarding anything happening on IRC, we haven't heard about them, and that's a problem.

Well, you don't want to sound like nobody ever noticed or responded to any complaints on IRC. Moderation tends to be more proactive on IRC, however, if any moderators (or the IRC equivalent) are active at the time someone is violating rules, so there's less reporting-and-responding and more active moderation than on the forums (Of course, on most forums, there's more active moderation and less reporting of posts than here, since there tend to be a much larger number of moderators - these forums have far too few to successfully be moderated in that manner (or successfully be moderated at all)).

Of course, it's entirely possible that there were complaints to Toady about the staff (people might want them to be more strict, less strict, or not to include a certain individual), or the rules (some people might not like certain rules, such as "The channel is not, however, intended for discussion of sex or drugs, nor for unending barrages of profanity," or "You may never link to, or discuss where to locate, illegal materials. This includes pirated software/movies/music, and any images/sites/videos for pornography or shock sites," for instance. People have complained about those rules, for instance, but those complaints are not really valid reasons to de-officialize a channel.) These complaints I listed as examples were all made on IRC at one time or another, but people rarely agree with each other on what they each want, and it isn't the job of staff to rewrite the rules to suit the wishes of the loudest people around.

In any case, we don't really know WHAT complaints Toady received, because he never forwarded them to anyone on the IRC channel's staff, as far as I'm aware. If there were complaints sent to Toady about the IRC channel, they probably should have reached the people who were operating the IRC channel as well so that the complaints could be evaluated.

Of course, it wouldn't surprise me if many of the complaints were along the lines of
Quote from: Imagined complaint
Hey, they banned me for no reason, just because I was trolling and being racist, and they won't unban me (unless I wait several months for my ban to run out)! This is totally unfair! Wait, I shouldn't say that. I should make myself sound like an hero, and IRC sound evil, like evil boats crossing in an ocean. Good plan! *rewrites complaint*

Personally, if I were Toady, I'd cut all ties with the "Finally..." section of forums (General Discussion, Forum Games and Roleplaying, etc) next.
Logged
<Dakkan> There are human laws, and then there are laws of physics. I don't bike in the city because of the second.
Dwarf Fortress Map Archive

G-Flex

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: DF IRC
« Reply #25 on: March 04, 2011, 02:44:10 pm »

Of course, it's entirely possible that there were complaints to Toady about the staff (people might want them to be more strict, less strict, or not to include a certain individual), or the rules (some people might not like certain rules, such as "The channel is not, however, intended for discussion of sex or drugs, nor for unending barrages of profanity," or "You may never link to, or discuss where to locate, illegal materials. This includes pirated software/movies/music, and any images/sites/videos for pornography or shock sites," for instance. People have complained about those rules, for instance, but those complaints are not really valid reasons to de-officialize a channel.) These complaints I listed as examples were all made on IRC at one time or another, but people rarely agree with each other on what they each want, and it isn't the job of staff to rewrite the rules to suit the wishes of the loudest people around.

Yeah, there have definitely been arguments about the rules before, although mostly either one-off comments from people, or mostly-constructive discussions. I don't know of anybody actually complaining to Toady, or anything like that.

Quote
In any case, we don't really know WHAT complaints Toady received, because he never forwarded them to anyone on the IRC channel's staff, as far as I'm aware. If there were complaints sent to Toady about the IRC channel, they probably should have reached the people who were operating the IRC channel as well so that the complaints could be evaluated.

Of course, it wouldn't surprise me if many of the complaints were along the lines of
Quote from: Imagined complaint
Hey, they banned me for no reason, just because I was trolling and being racist, and they won't unban me (unless I wait several months for my ban to run out)! This is totally unfair! Wait, I shouldn't say that. I should make myself sound like an hero, and IRC sound evil, like evil boats crossing in an ocean. Good plan! *rewrites complaint*

The thing is, we'll never know, because we were never informed, which... also sort of prevents anything from being done about it in a proactive or reactive sense.

Of course, there's the chance that Capntastic's memory is playing tricks on him and he's referring to something else. For instance, there was an incident a long time ago where an operator on IRC said a distasteful joke involving the sarcastic use of a racial slur, which got us delisted as the official channel (as if nothing bad ever happens on the forums, or anywhere else) until we had that operator give up the position and managed to get Toady to re-list us. Not to defend what happened there, or anything like that.

There have also been incidents where people from the IRC channel (particularly myself, some of the others in this thread, and a couple more) get annoyed by something on the forums and wind up responding to it at the same time here, making it look like there's some kind of concerted effort to be a part of the problem. There was recent stupid drama over this, but I won't bring it up, and none of it has anything to do with anything that happened in the IRC channel itself anyway.

Quote
Personally, if I were Toady, I'd cut all ties with the "Finally..." section of forums (General Discussion, Forum Games and Roleplaying, etc) next.

I have my own opinions regarding this, which I stated well enough in that old "state of the forums" thread that Retro started, then which devolved into silly arguments, got locked, and mostly ignored by Toady.

I agree that the forums aren't successfully moderated. Toady relies on reporting, but for reasons I've stated elsewhere (see above) that simply doesn't work, especially because it essentially deputizes the userbase, because you're relying on people to rat each other out, and hoping that bad threads get noticed by people who would never even go to them.

Take a recent unnamed roleplaying thread in FG&RP, for instance. A thread like that is hard enough to moderate, what with it accumulating pages of posts per day on its own. However, when something goes bad in a thread like that, who ends up reporting it? The people playing won't report it because they're the ones who are least likely to care, and most people to not see the problem (or participate in the problem). Most other forum members, if they're just acting as users, won't notice it either, because they're not likely to be interested in the thread in the first place, or are likely to start ignoring it before it goes bad. Speaking for myself and some other people from IRC, at least, the only reason stuff like that gets reported (in this case, the sexy roleplay got a bit heavy after a protracted amount of barely skirting the rules about it) is because we don't act as users; we have to intentionally inject ourselves into threads and subforums we have little interest in so that whatever shenanigans go on there actually get reported if they deserve it. In other words, we have to act like moderators, especially because you cannot expect users to self-moderate, especially in something as isolated as a thread. On IRC, self-moderation is a little easier, because everything is in one place and nothing really goes unnoticed, and even there you can't count on it. On a forum, though, cliques can form, threads get isolated from other threads, subforums get isolated from other subforums, and it's surprisingly easy for a Very Bad Thread to go flat-out unnoticed because the only people who participate are, unsurprisingly, the ones interested in engaging in whatever's going on. This isn't really a controversial opinion, either; it happens all the time where I, or people I know, will notice threads where things have gone sour but that people in the thread aren't doing jack about, and that nobody else is doing jack about either because users shouldn't have to try to pay attention to stuff they have no interest in just to see if rules are being broken... yet that's exactly the case here.

Toady and ThreeToe evidently aren't capable of proactively moderating the forums on their own, and I don't blame them for that; I don't think anybody does. I would hate to be in their position as well, and you can't really do better with only two people around, especially when neither of them are really active members of the forum (for the most part) and Toady is more focused on developing the game. Problem is, the purpose of the report system is so the forums/threads don't have to try to act the role of moderators themselves, but it forces them to do so anyway in order for anything to get done sometimes.
Logged
There are 2 types of people in the world: Those who understand hexadecimal, and those who don't.
Visit the #Bay12Games IRC channel on NewNet
== Human Renovation: My Deus Ex mod/fan patch (v1.30, updated 5/31/2012) ==

Captain Mayday

  • Bay Watcher
  • A Special Kind of Terrible
    • View Profile
Re: DF IRC
« Reply #26 on: March 04, 2011, 02:49:00 pm »

Ehhh, G-Flex, I don't think we need to derail this thread into that discussion again.
Logged
Why not join us on IRC? irc.newnet.net #bay12games

G-Flex

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: DF IRC
« Reply #27 on: March 04, 2011, 02:49:57 pm »

You're probably right. It wasn't exactly fruitful the last time.
Logged
There are 2 types of people in the world: Those who understand hexadecimal, and those who don't.
Visit the #Bay12Games IRC channel on NewNet
== Human Renovation: My Deus Ex mod/fan patch (v1.30, updated 5/31/2012) ==

thvaz

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: DF IRC
« Reply #28 on: March 04, 2011, 02:52:33 pm »

Quote
Personally, if I were Toady, I'd cut all ties with the "Finally..." section of forums (General Discussion, Forum Games and Roleplaying, etc) next.

Not everything down there is crap, as there is this wonderful gem who itself made all that board worthy: http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=55601.0
Logged

G-Flex

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: DF IRC
« Reply #29 on: March 04, 2011, 02:56:10 pm »

Yeah, not even I want to nuke the entirety of it. Some of that could definitely be absorbed by Creative Projects, though.

General Discussion is a little harder to discuss, because there are basically two communities in one there: The "happy thread" undirected discussion type, who also largely seem to hang out in FG&RP, and... well, the other people. Not that neither engages in the others' stuff, or that there isn't any overlap, but there's definitely a moderately fragmented community around here.
Logged
There are 2 types of people in the world: Those who understand hexadecimal, and those who don't.
Visit the #Bay12Games IRC channel on NewNet
== Human Renovation: My Deus Ex mod/fan patch (v1.30, updated 5/31/2012) ==
Pages: 1 [2] 3