Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

Socialist

17 (33.3%)

Green

8 (15.7%)

Peace and Freedom

2 (3.9%)

Democratic

1 (2%)

Transhumanist

11 (21.6%)

Libertarian

8 (15.7%)

Republican

2 (3.9%)

Constitution

2 (3.9%)

Total Members Voted: 50

[Tiruin]

It's unsecure enough that you can relabel all the fields through the URL, and you think it requires you to state sex and age?

...You can fill it in and get results without stating age and gender?

wat

It does say they're optional.

*sigh*
Cheers to fallibility.

[freeformschooler]

Also, while we're on the topic of pseudoscience personality test silliness, this article is excellent.

[mastahcheese]

Screw you dominance!

1:You are conscientious, diligent and pay attention to detail. You constantly strive for accuracy and high standards.
2: You have an inner drive to be systematic and precise in all that you do.
3: You are a natural choice for work that requires attention to detail and accuracy.

1: My attention to detail is rubbish. I'm apathetic when it comes to standards.
2: One look at my work and all the stuff that I just say "meh, good enough" and you'd see this is incorrect.
3: I have a natural choice for work that doesn't require the expenditure of energy.

Pretty accurate test, I'd say.

[Tiruin]

Also, while we're on the topic of pseudoscience personality test silliness, this article is excellent.

...That's a silly article with silly reasons. I feel discriminated as an introvert. :I

[Solifuge]

Also, while we're on the topic of pseudoscience personality test silliness, this article is excellent.

Err... I would have actually liked to read an article about Extroverts. Instead, I got a poorly-concealed rant about how needy, dysfunctional, self-absorbed, and generally terrible Introverts are. :\

[LordSlowpoke]

Also, while we're on the topic of pseudoscience personality test silliness, this article is excellent.

Err... I would have actually liked to read an article about Extroverts. Instead, I got a poorly-concealed rant about how needy, dysfunctional, self-absorbed, and generally terrible Introverts are. :\

i want to find the person who wrote that and rip out their voicebox with a rusty spoon

i will speak at whichever volume i want you little shit

[Vector]

I think you did just read an article about extroverts.  In particular: about their biases vis-a-vis introverts.

[mastahcheese]

Wow.

We're about to form a mob.
Of introverts.

Since when do introverts mob?

[Tiruin]

Since when do introverts mob?

When nobody expects it.
Also we're human. People. Not just a set of 'definitive characteristics' which you may allude to our superficial form.

..THough I'll just discard that article as a...very poorly-worded joke-article given how obvious the differences are. And the wording. And t_he...

[Dutchling]

I agree with whomever made that article that the "lol introvert so awesome" spam was /really/ annoying.

[Oliolli]

Steady and complaint.

[alexandertnt]

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

Time to join the zero dominance club and wait around for people to tell me what to do

Some of these personality tests make me sound increadibly boring...

[freeformschooler]

Also, while we're on the topic of pseudoscience personality test silliness, this article is excellent.

Err... I would have actually liked to read an article about Extroverts. Instead, I got a poorly-concealed rant about how needy, dysfunctional, self-absorbed, and generally terrible Introverts are. :\

The article wasn't even about extroverts and introverts. Anyone with half a brain can see most of that list is blatant facetiousness. I could write the same thing from the other side of the coin, and it would sound exactly as stupid, false, and elitist. Rather than a poorly concealed rant, I posted it as a well-concealed reminder that we, far too often, come up with arbitrary and ridiculous ways to separate and feel superior to each other. Introverts vs extroverts is just the latest dumb way of doing that, and it goes both ways.

And yet, the comments there on it go on to embody the elitist behavior it's describing :I

[Cecilff2]

Time to join the zero dominance club and wait around for people to tell me what to do

Gimme ur money.

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

You are responsive to challenges in a practical, realistic and enthusiastic manner. You are a fact orientated person capable of providing help based on solid information.
You are assertive, self-sufficient and individualistic
People are likely to perceive you as being rational and creative at the same time.

[WealthyRadish]

Spoiler: Tremble before my passivity! (click to show/hide)

It's annoying that they don't keep the colors for the different traits consistent. What's the point of a colorful graph if the colors change between tests?