Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

Socialist

17 (33.3%)

Green

8 (15.7%)

Peace and Freedom

2 (3.9%)

Democratic

1 (2%)

Transhumanist

11 (21.6%)

Libertarian

8 (15.7%)

Republican

2 (3.9%)

Constitution

2 (3.9%)

Total Members Voted: 50

[Owlbread]

It means you're actually not an Englishman.

[Descan]

Yeah, you're just a Scot who wears pants.

[misko27]

Yeah, you're just a Scot who wears pants.

Shots fired.

Here's me biting.

You are a Reserved Experiencer.

Your inquisitive nature, imagination, and hands-on practicality make you an EXPERIENCER. Odd name but true enough.
You are willing to experiment to find things that work the most efficiently. Yep
Getting stuck in certain habits is boring to you—you'd rather find new experiences.  Not really, pretty neutral there.
Your vision of the world is complex – your values are not set in stone. Instead, you are able to change your beliefs as you learn new information. Spot on

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

I'm da man!
Trust is rock bottom. Should come as no surprise I suppose, I do genuinly distrust and see the worst in people.

And yet you are such a open person. It's your only weakness. Strive to close yourself from the world.

[Detonate]

I'm a benevolent director. I thought it was a Benevolent Dictator but it turned out to be director. That 100% extroversion and 92% empathy, tho. Still no idea what agency is.

[misko27]

I'm a benevolent director. I thought it was a Benevolent Dictator but it turned out to be director. That 100% extroversion and 92% empathy, tho. Still no idea what agency is.

Making decision. Act now, act decisively, act forcefully, but act now.

[Putnam]

I think here it refers to how much you think your own actions are the deciding factor in your life.

[Xantalos]

I'm apparently a Generous Idealist.
Huh. No idea what that means, but I'm neither.

[Dutchling]

I'm apparently a Generous Idealist.
Huh. No idea what that means, but I'm neither.

You're the guy who keeps voting for corrupt politicians.

[Xantalos]

I'm apparently a Generous Idealist.
Huh. No idea what that means, but I'm neither.

You're the guy who keeps voting for corrupt politicians.

No, I'm the one who keeps eating fronting them in the first place.

[misko27]

The descriptions make a lot more sense if you read the specifics. Otherwise you get strange things like actually being Kim Jung Un.

[fivex]

I'm a Generous Thinker, apparently.
The only bars over 30 are Empathy and Spontaneity.

[Xantalos]

The descriptions make a lot more sense if you read the specifics. Otherwise you get strange things like actually being Kim Jung Un.

Which none of us totally are, ho ho ho!~

[Eagle_eye]

Generous Idealist, apparently.

"Your awareness of those around you, along with your nuanced perceptions of the world at large, makes you the GENEROUS person that you are. "
"are reluctant to pass judgments on others. "
"appreciation for different perspectives and opinions"

Yeah, no, something's not right here.

[Tiruin]

The more I think about this masculine/feminine rating, the more distrustful I am of the results of this test and the entire theory behind it.[...]

[...]

Also, they have definitions for the traits; click the Glossary of Terms hotlink on the results page. Femininity and Masculinity are based on "adherence to female/male stereotypes", so it's probably corollary to different questions related to traditional feminine/masculine behavior.

...I'm now siding with Sappho here. That's pretty cheap seeing that 'adhering to stereotype' (emphasis, STEREOTYPE, instead of treating the personhood as is) looks like a better idea to rate than not (though, it does give...an 'idea' of how a person is.) I mean, what if I'm male? :O

[Itnetlolor]

I don't know. If I'm reading into it correctly, the stereotype is easier to base off of due to familiarity.

For example, you can have a very masculine female (or basically someone you wouldn't want to piss off that might also be able to out-drink you in a drinking contest (Male > Female, by a margin of 50-75), and you can have rather effeminate (straight) males that are "Metro-sexual" breeds or something of the sort (same margin, swap points). As far as I can tell, based on your familiarity of said stereotypes, it can or can't be accurate. Minor bias as to how much of said stereotype you understand or have observed.

I, of course, state the potential bias due to the fact that one could be around very masculine women and account that as a norm of feminine behaviors, and same with the masculine like I stated before for a majority of their lives, and thus bias their results due to their familiarity being different than the majority norm. But all that aside, I think they're counting on familiarity of said stereotypes based on the majority (Feminine = Barbie, Masculine = Hot Wheels, so to put it) as the basis of the norms being used.

EDIT:
Basically, at least from what I've observed, even with my own stats (see previous post for how I analyzed it), I think I did a fair assessment of what mine meant. Of course, my margins are on a high-level (near-maxed out on masculine, and halfway feminine). If you lack male and female stereotypes, you could be a spambot, though that could be a stereotype of autonomous beings, and be offensive to Skynet.