I'd not use it, and I'd wreck it.
I am another conservative pig, and I don't feel that redistribution of wealth like this is economically sound. At all.
With the way our government and our market (and by this I mean nearly every country in the world, but specifically America) is structured, it depends upon people owning businesses and having a hierarchy of who is over who.
Suddenly, those at the top can't afford to run the larger businesses. Investors can't afford to invest as heavily in businesses, because they only have a middle amount of money. Suddenly, those at the bottom no longer need to have the bad jobs they're forced to take.
Businesses find themselves rent apart, as even if people decide to keep their jobs, the business can't hold itself together monetarily. These businesses collapse. Noone except possibly a very lucky few have jobs. But hey, they've got as much money as everyone else, so it'll be fine, right?
Wrong.
Because the suppliers of goods are no longer in working order. The transporters of goods are no longer in working order. The retailers of goods are no longer in working order.
RIP actually getting things.
RIP economy.
Countries are interlaced quite heavily when it comes to the economy.
R.I.P. world economy.
...so yeah I'd break that button.
But let's suppose I don't quite know what I'm talking about here. Suppose businesses still stay afloat.
People are still going to be pissed, things are certainly going to get majorly bungled in response, legislation will likely have to be passed in droves, and things still won't be good.