It's a building destroyer naturally, but also a person who writes a post just to start an argument.
I meant no offense, if he (You) felt offended - excuse me. But a "There are lamps" response surely clears things out
E : Ah, a valid point. I didn't consider costs at all. As for medical - no doubts about that, it won't be long till blind people will start seeign again, and as it is now, i am sure we can keep people up and running with any lights. But in my PoV the 'tech' alone wouldn't be sufficient at all. I assumed "j0nas" meant just the lamps, and nothing else.
Perhaps you are not remembering correctly. That's okay, we can always scroll back to read up on why I focused only on light, and nothing else.
No matter how cool it would be to live underground, sun-light is a vital part of our lives.
Thus unless they find a way to re-produce its effects underground, it's a no-go for longer time periods.
The technology to do this already exists, it's called 'lamps'. They also come in UV varieties, should you so desire.
Here we go. See, your main concern with the viability of living underground was the lack of sunlight. That was a silly concern, which is why I pointed that out, and only that. There was no need to mention the fact that living underground would be vastly more expensive, less convenient or anything else, because you were not objecting on any of those points, but on the point of light alone.
I'm sorry if the fact that you 'keep using sunlight + mirrors to light MY apartment' did not make you an uncontested authority on the subject, or in this case even vaguely clued-in, but putting you straight most definitely does not make me or anyone else a 'troll'.