Goddamn deadlocks. Somebody needs to switch votes, it seems.
LNCP Why you insist that my SD vote was based only on his inactivity ? Also what's your opinion on toaster play so far ?
Because you've said nearly nothing after the vote on Painiac. You haven't provided much reasoning, nor have you made any kind of attack against him. The only post you have is a comment of his claim.Goddammit, I missed one post.
The thing is, your reasons for voting Painiac was inactivity, and that argument is now invalid for St. D (seeing as you said "All my previous reasons are still standing"). What reasons do you have for voting him?
Toaster, though remaining calm, isn't posting as much as I'd like him to or doing much investigation on other people. I don't have many reasons to suspect him at this point, though.
Well at this point it all comes to one question in my opinion : Do SD claim is false or not ?
Of course if he's lying he's obviously scum,but if his claim is true it really don't change anything except clearing him.
Problem lies in the question why would he lie about this claim if he were scum. He could as well vote me to get to lynch situation,he wasn't in dire need of defense at the moment he claimed. If that wouldn't be enough he could back it up with cop claim calling me scum and other townie to help them decide to vote me. But why would he try headless attacks like that ? Still if he can't prove that he wants scum lynched vote stands. Right now i'm leaning to the option that the claim is false but he must give something more about his reasoning.
What I think is most likely is that he tried to use a falseclaim to strengthen his authority, and proceeded to attack some random town without any proper arguments.
I had a small hunch when I got lynched.
since there was a replacement needed I thought I would replace in to help.
That was when I found out that painiac is cop.
Obviously I got Very excited when I saw his inspects.
The current vote distribution is shit.
That's right tyberix, I wouldn't have any reason to call a fake roleclaim as scum, since I could just put my vote on you with toaster and LNP,(who If not scum he would just be following the IC's reasoning along with some of his own...)since you got enough against you to vote for already from toasters and LNP's reasonings.
Toaster And LNP
Lets see your reasonings for voting Tyberix again please.
Okay reading a few pages from when LNP replaced in I noticed that he had you in mind as a target already, didn't he tyberix?
And wait...
They were both after you because Of non-commitment...
Wasn't Japa non-committal on D1? I was too, but japa and toaster didn't really care about it for some reason...
They were kinda twisting your words aren't they?
"A small hunch"? Is that all you have to go on?
Blatant buddying, it seems. You're defending Tyberix and trying to woo him with your words. Your scumminess becomes ever more clear.
My reasoning is outlined
here, and I don't think I need to rewrite it.
Not just passivity. My points are outlined above.
Japa was non-committal, but there were more blatantly scummy people around. I did pay attention to it. He wouldn't be accusing himself of passivity, obviously.
Twisting his words how, SaintDraze?
Author
Topic: Beginner's Mafia XXI - Game Over: Be Ashamed. Be Very Ashamed. (Read 56594 times)