...
If you are interested in the nightkill then why are you interested? You've heard my theory.
Theory that is what ? Asking "innocent" questions ? You want me to ask "Are you a cop so i could kill you tonight ?" or something like that ? I still don't know what's wrong with asking about NK it's important part of the game isn't it ? So why i should not ask about it ? I could answer with your own words :And the hell testing reactions (asking questions) isn't necessary. It's another tool in the scumhunting tool belt. I used it on you, and I got results.
Asking for NK is one of possible questions so i just asked it without any plan to get expected answer - just to look into it for scumminess.
Oh, you. You've gone and done one of my favorite pet peeves players do in this game.
Using my own words against me.Do you know how many scum have done that?
Enough.Here's the thing: I don't care. I don't have to.
What were you hoping to find from that question? What would you have considered scummy in response to your questions about the night kill?
Also, I said I suspected you for your talk about the night kill. I never said I thought you were scum, until you decided to defend yourself from me stating I was suspicious of you. Everybody does suspicious things, but that doesn't mean they're scum.
So who do you call scum ? People who you found no evidence on ? Or people who attack you or your partner ? How else then you find who is scum other than searching for suspicious actions ?
Are the wild accusations supposed to scare me? Drop it. Right now. It's not helping your case at all. And if you want to say that I'm scum, maybe you should work my name into your list of suspicions. Actually, don't, that's me laying a trap for you. If you did I would accuse you of being defensive and suspecting the people who are attacking you for that reason alone.
My point was this: people will say they suspect you all the time. Unless they ask you a question about it, or they decide to vote you for it, you should let it pass. You have more important things to do than defend yourself from every little bit of suspicion.
The problem with what you did is that you rushed to defend yourself from the little bit of suspicion I laid out. You should have, instead, used the time to go find scum. It makes you look like you're interested in keeping yourself alive over finding scum, which is a very scummy attitude.
That's not that he tries bothers me , but the fact that asking these questions to people who vote on him could mean only one of two things :
a)He needs more arguments on SaintDraze , but he shouldn't ask other to find it for him - his attack is baseless if he don't have anything to support it with.
b)He wants to change others votes - that's nothing wrong - but again he should do it himself! In this situation it's bad looking version of : "Your vote doesn't suite me : change it please, i don't like being voted" - no convincing arguments,no pointing out errors , he essentially tells them to find defense for him!
I'm not voting because i feel Ottofar should say something before i vote him - my reason's why i voted him are still same as before since he not answered to them he is still my prime suspect, but voting now that he's replaced feels weird to me before he speaks out.
It's funny you have all these reasons for suspecting Supercharazad. But then you say your top suspicion is Ottofar. And I have no idea what you are voting him for. What you were voting him for.
You have a reasonless top suspicion and then you have lots of reasons for your second pick. That's inconsistent. Inconsistency like that is scummy.
Hmm. I think you're scum. Unvote, Tyberix. Messes of contradictions and preemptive defenses are pretty frequently scum. Also, noncomittal and passive voting as well.
I would be happy to see these contradictions you found. I agree that maybe i put too little stress on votes but when i feel is should change it i do it without doubt - sometimes i forget that if it was pressure vote it's nullified :\
Okay.
You have no reasons for your top pick.
You have many reasons for your second pick.
You are not voting your top pick.
There's your mess of contradictions.