Book, let's start with you. I notice you haven't been doing any scumhunting since you started arguing with Webadict about stupid shit. Why is that?
Book
Heh. Toaster, where are you? Are you going to vote me too? I find it funny that I'm voted specifically by those I mentioned on my scumpicks yesterday:
You are scum. Unvote Toaster, vote Webadict. But I still think Toaster is scummy. My next picks, for those keeping track, are Mr.Person, and Org.
But yeah, I agree I didn't hunt as much yesterday after wuba started his tunnel... those walls of text are distracting and take a long time to read and write. Still, I'd dispute that I didn't do
any.
My suspicions from D1 remain, though:
-
Toaster: I still don't trust your claim, and according to wuba's numbers, it has a 67% chance of being fake.
-
Wuba: I find your tunnel suspicious, and your numbers suspect. Your failure to defend them is also suspect, as is your entirely unreasonable reads of things like
this, which Janus called you on, to cite one of
many examples. I don't buy it. You are scummy.
-
Person: Your participation has been limited to two
bloody enormous walls of text, and endless "arguing about stupid shit", as you put it. You are not committed to finding scum, and your arguments and lurking are suspicious as well.
But we have a new contender!
So, you're saying you want to request a shortening, but don't want to be seen as scummy?
I'd call that protecting your image, pal. Be scum less?
So yeah, I guess I object to extending.
I think this is actually very damning. You didn't even aknowledge webadict's post while doing that, Book.
It's also weird how you decided to end the day with Janus one vote ahead when several people had mentioned the possibility of an enchanter.
I didn't shorten the day, any more than the dozen people who didn't request an extension. It ended when it was scheduled to end. I didn't extend for the reasons I listed: The result seemed settled and discussion had died down, so let the game take its course. I didn't acknowledge wuba's post because it didn't merit one, it was a patently ridiculous reading of my post. And every game has a possibility of an enchanter; I didn't know one existed any more than you did (but maybe I assume to much? Did you?)
The entire kook thing is bullshit, incidentally. There have been paranormal games with 2 kooks in the past. The chance of it happening is NOT the chance of one of them being scum, and even if it were, 2 lynches for a 67% chance to hit scum is actually terrible. And I don't like chainlynches that involve lynching town first ("If he's scum, then he's his partner" is better, since it at least involves getting scum. "If he's town, this other guy is scum" is not acceptable).
That's not what I said. I didn't vote for Ottofar, and never advocated chainlynches. If you read the last comment of the day, you'll see I say it would be interesting, but that I
wouldn't vote for it. If one of the kook claimants happens to die, though, and does indeed flip kook, then
by wuba's numbers the other one does have a 67% chance of being scum, and should die next. If a claimant dies and flips scum, the other one would be pretty much confirmed. Do you agree with Wuba's numbers?
Once again, you agree with wuba's
pantently ridiculous and disingenuous interpretation of my post, putting words in my mouth that I never said.
The fact that you can't even be bothered to come up with original points is even more troublesome. You try to use his points to make a retarded spurious case based on falsehoods so you can jump on a bandwagon. I'm now pretty sure you are scum,
Leafsnail.
In addition, Pandar, Dariush and Argembarger have also seemed lurky and uncommitted, would like to see more of them.
Some questions:
Toaster: You voted Janus for finding your claim suspicious, and he would have hanged for it. Do you think your voting him was justified? Who else is on your scum list? People calling you suspicious?
Wuba: Do you or do you not stand by your earlier numbers? If you do, would you or would you not vote to lynch someone who has a 67% chance of being scum?
Person: Why do you push for a mass claim? If you are so sure, shouldn't you start? How would a medium be so helpful? The wardens don't know their target's alignment, certainly didn't block the dopp kill, and wouldn't know their killer. At most we could get something useful from MBP, though, but if he has the information and posts it in deadchat, I'm sure the medium will claim without your prompting. Please justify your request. Also, what are your current reads on Toaster, Wuba and JimG?
Pandar:
I still feel Ottofar deserves the lynch but if it's necessary to avoid potential lynchfuckery (e.g. JanusTwoFace is a Doppelganger Enchanter and switches to Ottofar last minute) I'm willing to switch Ottofar to him to make sure nothing explodes.
And then you didn't, which caused the nolynch. It clearly was "necessary to avoid lynchfuckery", so why didn't you? Who are your top picks?
Dariush: Lurk less. Who are your top picks and why? What's your read on Ottofar, Argembarger and Leafsnail?
Argembarger: You also were very lurky and noncomittal, and went hard after Org. If you were an enchanter, would you have prevented the lynch? What's your read of Pandar, Leafsnail and Person?