I meant real tomorrow. I thought we'd already agreed to a 48 hour extension.
Extension.
Hey, NativeForeigner, please only quote the bit of my post that's relevant, not the whole thing.
Anyway,
No, not a tell. At least not a good one. Just something warranting attention. I turned my attention away from you because there's other BS going on that's more important (in my opinion) than this little back and forth we're having about my previous lurkiness.
...I'm not attacking you due to lurkiness now. It was actually active lurking and passivity in the first place, and now it's changed.
And uh... why move your vote to someone else while quoting just one of their arguments and saying their reasoning is flimsy without saying why they're scummy?
I meant real tomorrow. I thought we'd already agreed to a 48 hour extension.
I, uh, did follow up? No, it's dirtying my name and trying to make it seem like I'm only participating or following up because I'm afraid of getting found out. That's not the case, at all.
Then why unvote only when you think I no longer respect you? Ok, you're claiming that Book's "flimsy reasoning" is so important it meant you had to switch your vote to him. But why was I suddenly not thought of as scummy?
Yes, hehehe, I Org was Org. He stuck flawlessly to his meta. I saw no benefit in pushing him on that matter. I did, however, see benefit in pushing him on the current matter. Seriously, stop selective-reading.
It's not selective. You said quite clearly that people should follow up on things they think are bad answers, and that you didn't follow up on what you thought was a bad answer from Org.