Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 152 153 [154] 155

Author Topic: Starsector [TopDown Sandbox RPG on Space]  (Read 369870 times)

Loud Whispers

  • Bay Watcher
  • They said we have to aim higher, so we dug deeper.
    • View Profile
    • I APPLAUD YOU SIRRAH
Re: Starsector [TopDown Sandbox RPG on Space]
« Reply #2295 on: January 12, 2024, 11:03:37 am »

Quote
Galatia Academy probe package retrieval mission:
Added description of where the probe will be found
Excluded certain terrain (system-wide nebula and very large ring systems) from list of possible locations
These were long overdue. I still have nightmares about that one probe from several runs back that was way in the boonies of a system-wide nebula.
"Probe is located some distance away from the centre of the star system"

WHERE ARE YOU WALDO

Quote
Black market trade can now fill demand
This seems interesting; not sure if I'm for or against it yet.
I'm all for it. But really I want there to be more sense of "scale" to reflect how much larger bigger planets are compared to smaller planets, and for planets to have budgets which they actually use to settle trade balances & buy prereq materials

Mephansteras

  • Bay Watcher
  • Forger of Civilizations
    • View Profile
Re: Starsector [TopDown Sandbox RPG on Space]
« Reply #2296 on: January 12, 2024, 11:13:40 am »

Yeah, a deeper economy simulation would be nice. I know Alex is more focused on it being a combat and exploration game, but trade is a natural avenue that people want to do as well. Maybe that'll be something he spends more time on once the game gets to 1.0 and all of his current 'core' systems are done.
Logged
Civilization Forge Mod v2.80: Adding in new races, equipment, animals, plants, metals, etc. Now with Alchemy and Libraries! Variety to spice up DF! (For DF 0.34.10)
Come play Mafia with us!
"Let us maintain our chill composure." - Toady One

Loud Whispers

  • Bay Watcher
  • They said we have to aim higher, so we dug deeper.
    • View Profile
    • I APPLAUD YOU SIRRAH
Re: Starsector [TopDown Sandbox RPG on Space]
« Reply #2297 on: January 12, 2024, 11:20:35 am »

Yeah, a deeper economy simulation would be nice. I know Alex is more focused on it being a combat and exploration game, but trade is a natural avenue that people want to do as well. Maybe that'll be something he spends more time on once the game gets to 1.0 and all of his current 'core' systems are done.
Plus it's something he had attempted before, which I think would add vast tons of depth to the game, all whilst helping better integrate player planet economies to the wider sector. Right now supply chains being disrupted doesn't really have any ripple effects, because there are no supply chains. But just imagine how cool it would be to have a much more viable roleplay experience as an independent trade captain. Some pather cell conducts a terrorist attack on a high yield ore world supplying the hegemony with cheap ore. Hegemony doesn't have cheap alternative supply because of bad relations with the Persean League and Sindria, pays a higher price from Tri-Tach corporation and the Luddic Church. Then the price of Hegemony made metals, machine parts and supplies goes ever so slightly up, whilst Persean League and Sindria ever so slightly down, boosting their market access and temporarily boosting their profits. Plenty of opportunities for the player to take part in a moving economy, rather than being the messianic CEO around whom the stars quake

Mephansteras

  • Bay Watcher
  • Forger of Civilizations
    • View Profile
Re: Starsector [TopDown Sandbox RPG on Space]
« Reply #2298 on: January 12, 2024, 12:01:51 pm »

Yeah. While being able to be the uber-captain who can set up an empire to rival the Hegemony's power in just a few cycles is fun, you don't always want that out of a run.

More options to meaningfully act as a small player in the sector would be welcome.
Logged
Civilization Forge Mod v2.80: Adding in new races, equipment, animals, plants, metals, etc. Now with Alchemy and Libraries! Variety to spice up DF! (For DF 0.34.10)
Come play Mafia with us!
"Let us maintain our chill composure." - Toady One

Loud Whispers

  • Bay Watcher
  • They said we have to aim higher, so we dug deeper.
    • View Profile
    • I APPLAUD YOU SIRRAH
Re: Starsector [TopDown Sandbox RPG on Space]
« Reply #2299 on: January 13, 2024, 12:31:21 pm »

Yeah. While being able to be the uber-captain who can set up an empire to rival the Hegemony's power in just a few cycles is fun, you don't always want that out of a run.

More options to meaningfully act as a small player in the sector would be welcome.
Indeed. It's actually pretty hard right now to not end up snowballing into a juggernaut. Something like Sunless Seas (starsector and sunless seas both have a lot in common in their core gameplay loop of sailing around from port to port getting into hijinks), where in sunless seas you can work your way towards establishing your first colony but it's hard as hell and doesn't just automatically lead into being the world devouring megacorp

I think some more work into planets actually having to buy/sell things and transport them would also help with the whole issue of player empires being too snowbally. If there was more depth in what planets did:

1. Founding your first colonies would be more interesting, so there'd a bit more involvement than just "I have 2 million in the bank and 1,000 crew in the tank." This would tie into the whole idea that planets don't just automatically teleport supplies in, but actually have to import those supplies with money from somewhere, and resources from somewhere. So a nascent colony that has nothing to offer is going to be much harder to start up until it has a mining or farming industry set up. [As a side note, maybe also have it be that smaller planets take longer to attract pirates and hostile attention? It seems kinda ludicrous that my outpost of 1,000 people has large pirate armadas the same day the colony is founded]. Colonising in Duzahk would be a lot easier than colonising at the galactic rim.

2. Planets could have their own separate budgets from the player, and how the player chooses to profit from the planet would be up to them. You could have a very simple mechanic like players drawing their own salary from the planet, with the obvious balancing act between growing the planet and profiting from it. It would also allow the player to have very profitable planets without just being flooded with millions of credits every month. Sometimes you just want some planets for their productive capacity and for rent-free port storage. This kind of balance would also mean players who still want to make Hegemony-crushing empires can still make one, but also that it'll be less common for players to just accidentally become one

WealthyRadish

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Starsector [TopDown Sandbox RPG on Space]
« Reply #2300 on: January 13, 2024, 03:26:48 pm »

I remember being taken aback by the over-simplicity of the economy when it was first announced, though in practice my only real complaint with the economic system is how static the total market value is (especially after the change removing player-owned planets' contribution to demand).

I think the static "hazard rating" of planets is also a problem. In my campaigns I've ended up neglecting setting up any colonies until most of the sector is explored, by which point there's little left to do in the game. It would feel much better to settle for a crap planet early on, knowing its hazard rating sources could be reduced later by some means (I think there's one way to reduce the effect of cold/dark planets in this version, but that's it).

The other main gripe is the questionable punitive expedition system from other factions, but it looks like that will addressed very well in the next version.
Logged

Great Order

  • Bay Watcher
  • [SCREAMS_INTERNALLY]
    • View Profile
Re: Starsector [TopDown Sandbox RPG on Space]
« Reply #2301 on: January 13, 2024, 03:56:52 pm »

To be fair, Alex isn't wanting the game to be about colonising. The systems are all meant to feed back into combat in some way or another.

The extra systems are there to add greater depth to the combat focus, not to be their own systems. He discussed this when he was creating the hazard system, I believe.
Logged
Quote
I may have wasted all those years
They're not worth their time in tears
I may have spent too long in darkness
In the warmth of my fears

Loud Whispers

  • Bay Watcher
  • They said we have to aim higher, so we dug deeper.
    • View Profile
    • I APPLAUD YOU SIRRAH
Re: Starsector [TopDown Sandbox RPG on Space]
« Reply #2302 on: January 13, 2024, 07:54:47 pm »

To be fair, Alex isn't wanting the game to be about colonising. The systems are all meant to feed back into combat in some way or another.

The extra systems are there to add greater depth to the combat focus, not to be their own systems. He discussed this when he was creating the hazard system, I believe.
I think the best way to go about it is making combat fun and rewarding so players seek out combat. Cos realistically, if players weren't babysitting colonies, they'd be playing the game, raiding convoys and exploring the stars

Frumple

  • Bay Watcher
  • The Prettiest Kyuuki
    • View Profile
Re: Starsector [TopDown Sandbox RPG on Space]
« Reply #2303 on: January 13, 2024, 11:18:03 pm »

It would feel much better to settle for a crap planet early on, knowing its hazard rating sources could be reduced later by some means (I think there's one way to reduce the effect of cold/dark planets in this version, but that's it).
For what it's worth, it does, and mods add a pile of them. There's pretty fully fleshed out terraforming options among the colony related mods in existence, up to and including building your own hyperspace shunts.

I'm not sure if something or another lets you build entire star systems from scratch, but it wouldn't surprise me if there was. You can definitely get close to it with nebula systems and the options that let you turn gas giants into stars.
Logged
Ask not!
What your country can hump for you.
Ask!
What you can hump for your country.

feelotraveller

  • Bay Watcher
  • (y-sqrt{|x|})^2+x^2=1
    • View Profile
Re: Starsector [TopDown Sandbox RPG on Space]
« Reply #2304 on: January 14, 2024, 04:28:19 am »

Colonising in Duzahk would be a lot easier than colonising at the galactic rim.

Probably not in the next version  :D
Quote
Penelope's Star is now claimed by the Luddic Church, and Duzahk/Tia-Tax'et by the Hegemony

The systems are all meant to feed back into combat in some way or another.

Yes it is another game as random combat generator.  (I always get bored, given enough time.)

Weirdly, or not, the punitive expedition system reminds me of the earlier versions (pre world activation) of DF sieges.  Yeah, a bit of fun for a while but then just endless grind.
Logged

Loud Whispers

  • Bay Watcher
  • They said we have to aim higher, so we dug deeper.
    • View Profile
    • I APPLAUD YOU SIRRAH
Re: Starsector [TopDown Sandbox RPG on Space]
« Reply #2305 on: January 15, 2024, 09:04:01 am »

Colonising in Duzahk would be a lot easier than colonising at the galactic rim.
Probably not in the next version  :D
Quote
Penelope's Star is now claimed by the Luddic Church, and Duzahk/Tia-Tax'et by the Hegemony
takes off hegemony captain hat

puts on pirate helmet

Great Order

  • Bay Watcher
  • [SCREAMS_INTERNALLY]
    • View Profile
Re: Starsector [TopDown Sandbox RPG on Space]
« Reply #2306 on: February 02, 2024, 04:48:14 pm »

Update's out, bring out yer dead mods!
Logged
Quote
I may have wasted all those years
They're not worth their time in tears
I may have spent too long in darkness
In the warmth of my fears

Mephansteras

  • Bay Watcher
  • Forger of Civilizations
    • View Profile
Re: Starsector [TopDown Sandbox RPG on Space]
« Reply #2307 on: February 02, 2024, 05:10:34 pm »

I'm hoping it won't take much if any work to update most of them, since Alex says that this update is save compatible with 0.96.

But I guess I'll find out this evening when I start migrating mine.
Logged
Civilization Forge Mod v2.80: Adding in new races, equipment, animals, plants, metals, etc. Now with Alchemy and Libraries! Variety to spice up DF! (For DF 0.34.10)
Come play Mafia with us!
"Let us maintain our chill composure." - Toady One

Great Order

  • Bay Watcher
  • [SCREAMS_INTERNALLY]
    • View Profile
Re: Starsector [TopDown Sandbox RPG on Space]
« Reply #2308 on: February 04, 2024, 03:45:47 pm »

Hmm, you know I've been seeing some Fun Stuff in the Persean-Orion abyss from other people. I've not got there myself yet, I started a game without the boost from the Galatian Academy stipend so I'm a bit strapped for resources right now, but still looking forward to seeing what horrors lurk there.

EDIT: Yep. Can confirm. Abyssal hyperspace is freaky.
Spoiler (click to show/hide)
« Last Edit: February 04, 2024, 04:22:43 pm by Great Order »
Logged
Quote
I may have wasted all those years
They're not worth their time in tears
I may have spent too long in darkness
In the warmth of my fears

Great Order

  • Bay Watcher
  • [SCREAMS_INTERNALLY]
    • View Profile
Re: Starsector [TopDown Sandbox RPG on Space]
« Reply #2309 on: March 08, 2024, 10:14:58 pm »

There's currently been some kind of amusing drama in the modding scene.

Someone, we'll call them A, created a mod called Take No Prisoners. They made it open source, allowing anyone to mod it in any way they wanted. Someone else, we'll call them B, proceeded to fork the mod into an NSFW mod. I don't know the details, but I'd imagine with the OG mod it'd be a wee bit rapey.

A didn't like this. At all. Seriously. He threw all the toys out of the pram and not only stopped working on TNP but pulled it from the forums and removed every link to it. Ironically, this only left B's NSFW mod to do the same thing, so anyone wanting TNP's features was now forced onto it.

Realising that people were now using a mod that he didn't like in larger numbers, A decided the best way to fix that was to then add malware to his other mods. From then on, if one of his mods detected B's mod it'd crash the game and corrupt the save. Hilariously, the code it detected was in the TNP mod too, so what happened was anyone running the OG mod *or* the NSFW one was unable to play with any of those mods.

This was an unpopular move. Once this was discovered the guy was promptly banned from the forums and the subreddit, and Alex basically had to alter the modding rules to include "Don't make malware you fucking idiots". Meanwhile, the unofficial Starsector Discord had the mods act as insane as Discord mods do and they were praising him for it... Right up until they realised people didn't like that where they then temporarily then, I assume reluctantly, permanently banned him from the server.
Logged
Quote
I may have wasted all those years
They're not worth their time in tears
I may have spent too long in darkness
In the warmth of my fears
Pages: 1 ... 152 153 [154] 155