Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Org]

Pandar: Other than Org, who do you suspect?

Zrk2 for making a generic, meaningless attack.

You for saying Org is perfectly allowed to do what he's doing.

What am I doing?

[Zrk2]

Well, I may be tunneling, but I think that you are scummy, however, MBP, where are you?

[Mysteriousbluepuppet]

I am back from lab and ready to lay the smackdown.

Of note, i don't need any kind of covering or whatever, i can handle myself.

Frankly, first off, i don't see the point in a Org policy lynch. Org is org, and he look much more helpfull than he normally is.

I also see Zrnk or whatever being reaaally quick to change unpopular moves. 'May be due to newbie status and being eager to please, but still.

Pandar, you DID play with Org before, and so you should know that voting org hardly accomplish anything.

More toughts as they come.

[Pandarsenic]

I've also seen him be publicly announced to block a nearly-confirmed townie supercop 3 times and get away with it.

[Org]

I've also seen him be publicly announced to block a nearly-confirmed townie supercop 3 times and get away with it.

Two times.
I think.
I never actioned the second time.
Or maybe I lived the fourth night.
I don't remember.

[NativeForeigner]

I really don't see your point. Maybe I am just an idealist with illusions.
Bickering can also get annoying, and I didn't want to be bothered by everyone pointing fingers everywhere, I think I did well enough.
He was deflecting. I don't care what point he made, it was pretty obvious deflecting.
I missed that MBP had been missing.
Usually when people try attacking me with horrible reasoning that they don't even elaborate on, I do get frustrated.

Well, now. Counterpoint!
You are tunneling. You are tunneling very hard.
Not a very good thing to do.

This is the longest post I've probably ever seen from you. Is this a foreshadow of you being useful this game???

[Book]

Zrk2, however, shouldn't get away with being as unclear as possible.  Seriously, you're not Org, stop being as clear as him.  Give clear reasons for your vote.  Stop saying that a guy's not explaining himself when he most definitely DID.

Nice jumping onto a bandwagon, Jack AT. He has posted his rationale, so are you satisfied, or do you think he's scum? Or just want to see him hang?

[Jack A T]

You for saying Org is perfectly allowed to do what he's doing.

It's more that Org acting like a useless, unclear mess is pretty standard behaviour for him whether he's town or not.  Zrk2 acting like that, however, is different.  He's at least given his reasoning now, in a coherent way, which is nice, but that long period of Orgishness was just off.

Org, strangely enough, seems to be more active and coherent than usual.  To be frank, I don't trust either of them, but Zrk2's behaviour is more off (in a town-hazardous way, that is) than Org's, in my opinion.

[Zrk2]

So, Orgs meta is known, giving him an excuse to act like scum? I think he could use that meta brilliantly to cover up his scum actions. So don't try 'Org always acts like this.' because doesn't prove anything. In fact, it sounds like buddying and covering.

[Jokerman-EXE]

I don't support Org's playstyle or even pretend to understand it, but it works for him and it's hard to determine if he's scum or town. However, what bugs me is when people try to use this as reasoning one way or the other; it doesn't work, and never has.

[Zrk2]

I'm just saying his playing style shouldn't give him a free pass to act overtly anti-town, if he seems scummy, I'm going to call him on it every time.

Going to bed now, next post 3-4pm tommorw.

[Jack A T]

So, Orgs meta is known, giving him an excuse to act like scum? I think he could use that meta brilliantly to cover up his scum actions. So don't try 'Org always acts like this.' because doesn't prove anything. In fact, it sounds like buddying and covering.

Org's meta: Yeah, that's always a problem.  That, and the fact that his behaviour makes him much less useful than he should be, are probably why some people tend towards an Org policy lynch.

What I'm saying is not that Org's not a problem.  I'm not saying we should trust him.  Heck, if you weren't acting like you were, I'd be voting for him.  I'm saying that, at the moment, he's the lesser of two targets.  Being an unclear mess is anti-town (you and Org were guilty of that), and refusing to clarify when questioned is not exactly pro-town either.  And seemingly completely ignoring your target's answer to your question without even giving a reason until pressed by multiple people just doesn't look good (though it is better than not giving a reason at all).

[Org]

Hey Zrk, dont use meta.

[Jack A T]

Hey Zrk, dont use meta.

...And yet you don't seem to be complaining about my use of meta.  Then again, my use of meta was in your favour.

Unvote, vote Org.

I don't like either of you.  At all.

[Toaster]

Jokerman:

I don't support Org's playstyle or even pretend to understand it, but it works for him and it's hard to determine if he's scum or town. However, what bugs me is when people try to use this as reasoning one way or the other; it doesn't work, and never has.

Do you think Org is scum?  Besides him, what are your scum picks?


Zrk2:

Well, I may be tunneling, but I think that you are scummy, however, MBP, where are you?

Severe deflection noted.


MBP:

I am back from lab and ready to lay the smackdown.

Of note, i don't need any kind of covering or whatever, i can handle myself.

Frankly, first off, i don't see the point in a Org policy lynch. Org is org, and he look much more helpfull than he normally is.

I also see Zrnk or whatever being reaaally quick to change unpopular moves. 'May be due to newbie status and being eager to please, but still.

Pandar, you DID play with Org before, and so you should know that voting org hardly accomplish anything.

More toughts as they come.

I don't call that a smackdown.   Do you suspect anyone enough to vote?  If not, how do you intend to find someone worth voting?