So.
1st day: Tolyk is actively scumhunting and Ottofar wears no underwear. Also, tolyk voted for ottofar, but it's RVS, so no big thing. Both of you vote for shorten. Pandar gets nightkilled (note, he voted Tolyk).
2nd day: starts with everybody voting for Tolyk . With ottofar bandwagoning. Without giving a reason. Then I call him out on it, and he votes for me and claims I'm lurking, while blithely ignoring my question (ok, so I haven't done a lot compared to the others, but there's still the fact that he countered my question with a vote). Then he does the trick question. Tolyk then claims that if Ze Spy doesn't do anything, there would be one less scum around. I thought there would be two mafiabuddies, so I thought Tolyk did a scumslip there. Then, he asks for extend (and Ottofar points out the hypocrisy). Which is also why he was my main scumpick at that point. A lot later, nincompoop reveals that there's only one mafioso. Then Ottofar unvotes me, saying he thinks I'm less scummy than others, and votes Zrk2. He then quickly bandwagons Ze Spy. Native gets NK'd, and he voted for neither of you.
last day: I call Tolyk out for lurking (note, it was a pressure vote). Then Ottofar calls me out for the vote, stating that Mylo votes are risky. Tolyk answers and I unvote. Zrk2 votes for me, claiming I'm lurking. (sure, I may post alot without scumhunting content, but the posts generally are close enough to each other that it'd, you know, be kinda redundant to ask questions in 5 different posts within a single 3 hour period. Not that it excuses it, but hey, good questions are hard to come by).
No scumhunting is done, and Zrk2 gets nightkilled. Ottofar votes no lynch.
Today: I notice that I consideres Tolyk to be low-scummy because of his high post count, but then noticed that I just told him to stop lurking the day before, and vote for him. Tolyk then gives us his excuse (and yeah, the FUINL thread would've been the way to go), which does sound reasonable enough. And he starts scumhunting. Ottofar votes me, giving 3 reasons (activelurking I understand, but taking sides is imo stupid when you're not sure who's your friend, and NKing Zrk2 would've given scum the perfect excuse to vote me). Later he states that Tolyk is not investigateable (is that a real word?) enough. Cue me voting him. "[He's] fairly sure that Darvi is scum". Without giving any reasons. I start being serious. Tolyk joins me in my anti-ottofar crusade. asks why he keeps tapping on him(Tolyk) because of a "scumslip", despite not taking his vote off me. Ottofar counters by claiming an OMGUS by Tolyk. Ottofar then says that Tolyk must be scum because I'm suddenly being serious (again, no giving concrete proof). Tolyk asks him why Ottofar didn't vote then, but Ottofar apparently has a very busy RL and PFPs. Fair enough. nincompoop prods us, and I give Ottofar the chance to convince one of us of the other's guilt, and he claims buddying (also, I am considering that you're scum Tolyk. Which is why I made that suggestion in the first place).
Then this post takes place.
Scumpoint count: Tolyk/Ottofar
D1: +1(because of Pandar Death)/+0 (+ 9001 for not wearing underpants. Freak) 1/0
D2: +0/+3 (repeated bandwagoning and FTD) 1/3
D3: +1(lurking at the beginning)/-2(no lynch vote, unless it was just a ruse and he wasn't online before the lynch to vote for me) 2/1
D4: +0 (you were a bit scummier in my eyes, but you did nothing that would pass as a scumtell. Yet) /+3(voting without a reason, refusal to scumhunt, whimsical un- and revotes, flimsy accusations against tolyk. I would go on, but the day ends there) 2/4
Ottofar is scummier imo