Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4

Author Topic: Betelgeuse to go "Boom" in 2012, +/- 1,000,000 years  (Read 3629 times)

Aramco

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Betelgeuse to go "Boom" in 2012, +/- 1,000,000 years
« Reply #30 on: January 26, 2011, 10:08:35 pm »

Honestly? If that star exploded, it would be the end of all of us. The gamma ray burst would travel at the speed of light towards the planet, stripping the atmosphere, evaporate the oceans, burn everything less than 30 feet underground, and expose everything still alive to more than enough radiation to kill it.
Logged
Or maybe there's a god who's just completely insane and sends you to Detroit, Michigan in a new body if you ever utter the name "Pat Sajak".

Lord Shonus

  • Bay Watcher
  • Angle of Death
    • View Profile
Logged
On Giant In the Playground and Something Awful I am Gnoman.
Man, ninja'd by a potentially inebriated Lord Shonus. I was gonna say to burn it.

Heron TSG

  • Bay Watcher
  • The Seal Goddess
    • View Profile
Re: Betelgeuse to go "Boom" in 2012, +/- 1,000,000 years
« Reply #32 on: January 26, 2011, 11:25:43 pm »

the pic in the article makes the point that Betelgeuse is ****ing HUGE.
That was Venus compared to the sun. Here's a better picture.

Spoiler (click to show/hide)
Logged

Est Sularus Oth Mithas
The Artist Formerly Known as Barbarossa TSG

Criptfeind

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Betelgeuse to go "Boom" in 2012, +/- 1,000,000 years
« Reply #33 on: January 27, 2011, 04:44:42 pm »

Wow we got a wimpy sun. We should move to a planet around a better one.
Logged

MetalSlimeHunt

  • Bay Watcher
  • Gerrymander Commander
    • View Profile
Re: Betelgeuse to go "Boom" in 2012, +/- 1,000,000 years
« Reply #34 on: January 27, 2011, 04:53:09 pm »

For the record, that diagram is made of screenshots from this video.
Logged
Quote from: Thomas Paine
To argue with a man who has renounced the use and authority of reason, and whose philosophy consists in holding humanity in contempt, is like administering medicine to the dead, or endeavoring to convert an atheist by scripture.
Quote
No Gods, No Masters.

Virex

  • Bay Watcher
  • Subjects interest attracted. Annalyses pending...
    • View Profile
Re: Betelgeuse to go "Boom" in 2012, +/- 1,000,000 years
« Reply #35 on: January 27, 2011, 06:14:57 pm »

Wow we got a wimpy sun. We should move to a planet around a better one.
Big stars do tend to go 'pop' much earlier then small ones, so doing that may just put us around a ticking thermonuclear bomb the size of the inner solar system...
Logged

Grakelin

  • Bay Watcher
  • Stay thirsty, my friends
    • View Profile
Re: Betelgeuse to go "Boom" in 2012, +/- 1,000,000 years
« Reply #36 on: January 28, 2011, 02:10:44 pm »

Would you like to play a game?

How about global thermonuclear sun?
Logged
I am have extensive knowledge of philosophy and a strong morality
Okay, so, today this girl I know-Lauren, just took a sudden dis-interest in talking to me. Is she just on her period or something?

Fayrik

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Betelgeuse to go "Boom" in 2012, +/- 1,000,000 years
« Reply #37 on: January 28, 2011, 02:34:03 pm »

Would you like to play a game?

How about global thermonuclear sun?
The only winning move it to not play. ;D
Logged
So THIS is how migrations start.
"Hey, dude, there's this crazy bastard digging in the ground for stuff. Let's go watch."

Nikov

  • Bay Watcher
  • Riverend's Flame-beater of Earth-Wounders
    • View Profile
Re: Betelgeuse to go "Boom" in 2012, +/- 1,000,000 years
« Reply #38 on: January 28, 2011, 03:01:39 pm »

Actually Betelgeuse has already exploded. The light just hasn't reached us yet.
Logged
I should probably have my head checked, because I find myself in complete agreement with Nikov.

Tylui

  • Bay Watcher
  • O_o
    • View Profile
Re: Betelgeuse to go "Boom" in 2012, +/- 1,000,000 years
« Reply #39 on: January 28, 2011, 03:39:48 pm »

Actually Betelgeuse has already exploded. The light just hasn't reached us yet.

When did that happen?
Logged

Virex

  • Bay Watcher
  • Subjects interest attracted. Annalyses pending...
    • View Profile
Re: Betelgeuse to go "Boom" in 2012, +/- 1,000,000 years
« Reply #40 on: January 28, 2011, 03:41:16 pm »

More importantly, how the hell would you know?
Logged

Cecilff2

  • Bay Watcher
  • PikaaAAAAあああああ
    • View Profile
Re: Betelgeuse to go "Boom" in 2012, +/- 1,000,000 years
« Reply #41 on: January 28, 2011, 03:41:28 pm »

Not necessarily.  If the upper limit is 1000000 years from now.

It's around 640 light years away.  Which means the nova will happen 640 years before we see it.  It may have already exploded, but we don't know.
Logged
There comes a time when you must take off the soft, furry slippers of a boy and put on the shoes of a man.
Unless of course they don't fit properly and your feet blister up like bubble wrap.
Oh ho ho, but don't try to return the shoes, because they won't take them back once you've worn them.
Especially if that fat pig Tony is at the desk.

Derekristow

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
    • Steam ID
Re: Betelgeuse to go "Boom" in 2012, +/- 1,000,000 years
« Reply #42 on: January 28, 2011, 03:44:32 pm »

If I remember correctly, supernovas typically leave nebulae behind.  How do you think that would look from so close?
Logged
So my crundles are staying intact unless they're newly spawned... until they are exposed to anything that isn't at room temperature.  This mostly seems to mean blood, specifically, their own.  Then they go poof very quickly.

Virex

  • Bay Watcher
  • Subjects interest attracted. Annalyses pending...
    • View Profile
Re: Betelgeuse to go "Boom" in 2012, +/- 1,000,000 years
« Reply #43 on: January 28, 2011, 04:03:05 pm »

Like a big cloud of dust?
Logged

Tylui

  • Bay Watcher
  • O_o
    • View Profile
Re: Betelgeuse to go "Boom" in 2012, +/- 1,000,000 years
« Reply #44 on: January 28, 2011, 04:04:37 pm »

We could theoretically detect a missing star using gravity but we don't quite have enough precision in that field to detect it yet. And it would be a headache not only to get a machine to detect gravity in one direction, but then accurately pinpoint where the star is without being able to see where it is. What further complicates the matter is we don't even have an accurate measurement of the speed of gravity propagation either.

But it's theoretically possible!
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4