Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 25 26 [27] 28 29 ... 32

Author Topic: Gun rights discussion  (Read 18539 times)

Earthquake Damage

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Gun rights discussion
« Reply #390 on: January 18, 2011, 12:10:07 am »

Things are rather civilised down here when it comes to anything that can be used as weapons.

Them's fightin' words!

Consider:  Glass bottles, chairs, tire irons, baseball bats, hammers, saws, automobiles, fists...
Logged

Andir

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Gun rights discussion
« Reply #391 on: January 18, 2011, 12:10:21 am »

This slope sure is slippery.
Yeah, I'm going to bed.

You call it civilized, I call it child rearing and restrictive.  I want my toys... especially the cool lasers that can burn stuff.
Logged
"Having faith" that the bridge will not fall, implies that the bridge itself isn't that trustworthy. It's not that different from "I pray that the bridge will hold my weight."

Max White

  • Bay Watcher
  • Still not hollowed!
    • View Profile
Re: Gun rights discussion
« Reply #392 on: January 18, 2011, 12:11:23 am »

Things are rather civilised down here when it comes to anything that can be used as weapons.

Them's fightin' words!

Consider:  Glass bottles, chairs, tire irons, baseball bats, hammers, saws, automobiles, fists...

I said civilised, not regulated. We try not to stab each other with glass bottles.

Earthquake Damage

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Gun rights discussion
« Reply #393 on: January 18, 2011, 12:16:51 am »

I said civilised, not regulated. We try not to stab each other with glass bottles.

The way you used "civilized" seemed to imply "regulated", so I named a few of the great many things that can be used as weapons but (I hope) are not regulated.

If by "civilized" you instead meant you're non-violent, I ask this:  You try not to stab each other with (broken) glass bottles, so they remain unregulated.  Yet you're so barbarous as to be untrustworthy with knives?
Logged

Sir Finkus

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Gun rights discussion
« Reply #394 on: January 18, 2011, 12:22:25 am »

I'm off to bed too
Spoiler (click to show/hide)

Max White

  • Bay Watcher
  • Still not hollowed!
    • View Profile
Re: Gun rights discussion
« Reply #395 on: January 18, 2011, 12:23:07 am »

Yep!
Nobody gets to purchase a knife from a vendor untill the age of 18. The restrictions are rather harsh arn't they... Also, you can get arrested for carrying one in the street.

Neonivek

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Gun rights discussion
« Reply #396 on: January 18, 2011, 01:07:28 am »

I'm off to bed too
Spoiler (click to show/hide)

It just whispers to the wind don't it?
Logged

Nikov

  • Bay Watcher
  • Riverend's Flame-beater of Earth-Wounders
    • View Profile
Re: Gun rights discussion
« Reply #397 on: January 18, 2011, 01:24:48 am »

My Mauser calls out to me, yearning to let Communist blood once again.

Kill Bolsheviks... Avenge my former master...

I sleep with the radio on anymore.
Logged
I should probably have my head checked, because I find myself in complete agreement with Nikov.

Phmcw

  • Bay Watcher
  • Damn max 500 characters
    • View Profile
Re: Gun rights discussion
« Reply #398 on: January 18, 2011, 07:25:22 am »

My Mauser calls out to me, yearning to let Communist blood once again.

Kill Bolsheviks... Avenge my former master...

I sleep with the radio on anymore.
You sure it come from the east front. He could be coming from the west front, muttering you pro gun idea in the sole aim to increase mortality rate in America.

For the matter of regulated weapon (yes, combat knives are forbidden here, as well as nunchucs...) of course, we try to reduce any access to thing which may allow you to cause an harm to someone, within reason.
But it's amusing that you mention glass, in some events (large concert, festivals...) glass are forbidden and drinks must be served in plastic glasses, yes because hey may be a tool for aggression.
yup, that's for Belgium and for France.

Andir, Finkus, I'm happy to see that you both have prepared reasonable plan for dealing with intruder should they enter your house. But then, is the event that the robber deliberately choose to get up the stair likely enough to use a full 1000$ to improve your chances in this case? A baseball bat wouldn't do the trick?

Anyway, all we all can see, the difference between Europe (and Australia) and America is the way weapon are treated, as well as resorting to violence as a whole.

It's been an interesting discussion so far, for me.
Logged
Quote from: toady

In bug news, the zombies in a necromancer's tower became suspicious after the necromancer failed to age and he fled into the hills.

Urist is dead tome

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Gun rights discussion
« Reply #399 on: January 18, 2011, 08:27:13 am »

You guys do have police, right? Use them!

Police aren't meant for protection of citizens. Not in America at least.

Quote
I do keep a gun at my bedside table when I sleep
And that's exactly what I'm speaking about. You have no reason to believe you may get murdered but you keep a gun near your bed while you sleep as an insurance.
In Belgium you would be called paranoid. In America it's ok, apparently.
And on the moral aspect, you're getting ready to kill. Not to defend yourself, to kill whoever attack you. There is a distinction.
The fact that this distinction is lacking in America, that the gun ownership is high, that guns aren't required to be stored in a safe... all that can only make gun-crime flourish whenever crime is high (or even medium).

Having people store guns in safes has caused more than a couple of deaths. For example, in California two small girls were pitchforked to death because their father couldn't get his gun in time. The murderer was a crazed drug addict.

In California it is required that you must store ammunition and the gun itself separately. And California is now one the most dangerous states in the union.

phmcw, I'm afraid you have been ill informed what makes crime flourish.
Logged

Phmcw

  • Bay Watcher
  • Damn max 500 characters
    • View Profile
Re: Gun rights discussion
« Reply #400 on: January 18, 2011, 08:33:20 am »

Quote
In California it is required that you must store ammunition and the gun itself separately. And California is now one the most dangerous states in the union.
You give one example and make it pass for an argument.
On the exemple below, the father could have saved the girl if he didn't rely on his gun. Locked in a safe, reaching it would have been too long indeed.But would he have the time to reach it if it was upstairs in his bedroom?
Had he wrestled the drug addict instead, the outcome may have been different. (it is wide speculation anyway.)

I can give you a lot of example of developed countries where poeple don't rely on they guns for defense, and ALL of them have a lot less murder than America.

I'm afraid you have been ill informed what makes crime flourish.
Logged
Quote from: toady

In bug news, the zombies in a necromancer's tower became suspicious after the necromancer failed to age and he fled into the hills.

Urist is dead tome

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Gun rights discussion
« Reply #401 on: January 18, 2011, 08:37:31 am »

But he probably would have been killed had he attempted to wrestle someone with an advantage such as a pitchfork.

Instead of guns what do you think people should use?
Logged

Phmcw

  • Bay Watcher
  • Damn max 500 characters
    • View Profile
Re: Gun rights discussion
« Reply #402 on: January 18, 2011, 08:53:42 am »

If you must in a somehow regular basis fight to survive, there is a problem with you society : hardcore drug, chronic gang criminality, ...
Gun just somehow add to it by making everyone on edge (even a basic police control must expect you to have a gun).

Instead of arming themselves, citizen should fight criminality to their roots, adding more gun would only marginally worsen the problem.

So instead of gun use social security, legalize pot, fight  hard drugs, make shelters for homeless poeple, make drug addict follow treatment instead of sending them to prison, legalize prostitution, reduce social inequalities, provide decent education for everyone, and fight unemployment.

Edit : You could also use pepper spray I guess, but I don't endorse the use of teaser and other paralyzing weapon : they make abduction too easy.
« Last Edit: January 18, 2011, 08:59:30 am by Phmcw »
Logged
Quote from: toady

In bug news, the zombies in a necromancer's tower became suspicious after the necromancer failed to age and he fled into the hills.

Andir

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Gun rights discussion
« Reply #403 on: January 18, 2011, 08:56:35 am »

But he probably would have been killed had he attempted to wrestle someone with an advantage such as a pitchfork.

Instead of guns what do you think people should use?
Chairs.  It works for Jerry Springer.  Chairs solve all problems.
Logged
"Having faith" that the bridge will not fall, implies that the bridge itself isn't that trustworthy. It's not that different from "I pray that the bridge will hold my weight."

Urist is dead tome

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Gun rights discussion
« Reply #404 on: January 18, 2011, 09:19:47 am »

If you must in a somehow regular basis fight to survive, there is a problem with you society : hardcore drug, chronic gang criminality, ...
Gun just somehow add to it by making everyone on edge (even a basic police control must expect you to have a gun).

Instead of arming themselves, citizen should fight criminality to their roots, adding more gun would only marginally worsen the problem.

So instead of gun use social security, legalize pot, fight  hard drugs, make shelters for homeless poeple, make drug addict follow treatment instead of sending them to prison, legalize prostitution, reduce social inequalities, provide decent education for everyone, and fight unemployment.

Edit : You could also use pepper spray I guess, but I don't endorse the use of teaser and other paralyzing weapon : they make abduction too easy.


Because everyone knows that it's that easy. I personally don't know why no one thought of this before.

Not really. You have this attitude about you that you think politicians are dumb and you have the ultimate solution. I admit I've acted this way before. But not for something this big.

Also you never tell how one would or even could go about doing all this.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 25 26 [27] 28 29 ... 32