Pandarsenic already hit up most of these.
If you did suspect him you never made it clear. This is the only post you made where you it could be interpreted that you suspected Zrk2, but you did not have reasons.
At that time, adding bandwagoning to the list of my 'offences' wasn't at the top of my list of things to do.
Gah... but... why...
You are not learning your lesson. You don't avoid suspicion by not doing things people 'getcha' for, you avoid suspicion by
scumhunting.
Actively avoiding suspicion is one of the scummiest things you can do.
How is this not an admission that you were trying to get Ottofar lynched?
I suspected that he lied, because at the time I started questioning him I didn't have any proof to the contrary. And even if you think that I meant that I actually suspected him as scum, that still doesn't mean he was at the top of my list and I wanted to see him hang.
I don't really believe that, but whatever.
If Ottofar wasn't at the top of your list, you didn't make clear who was, and it's crap you trying to act like you always suspected Zrk2.
Well, if I was NKed that would exclude me from list of suspects, wouldn't it? In truth, I expected to re-view the victim's posts knowing that he is town and think about his interactions with other players. It didn't work.
Gah... but... why...
Yeah, waiting to be nightkilled is a very effective scumhunting strategy. Good job, dude!
Sometimes the nightkill can be clarifying but it never provides suspicions for you. Waiting for the kill is an extremely passive, and worse, completely ineffective move.
So, you have information about two players, neither of which came from the questions and both were passive observations. And I am the one who is accused of lack of hunting. *sigh*
Don't sigh at me, mister. Everything I learned came directly from questions I asked. These are not passive observations I'm making when I'm hounding your ass down for information.
Here's what I've learned: webadict isn't quite as full of shit as he previously appeared, but fuck him because it took longer than it should have to get this out. But he's not completely cleared because he's got issues with Pandarsenic but doesn't apparently suspect him, and his scum picks for the today are absolutely atrocious and appear completely arbitrary.
I fail to see the relation of questions to the fact that webadict isn't quite as full of shit as he previously appeared and the fact that his scum picks for the today are absolutely atrocious and appear completely arbitrary.
I asked everybody a general question at the beginning of the day. I asked webadict a specific question about his suspicions the previous day.
webadict gave an explanation for his suspicions on Day 1. Gut feelings and intuition I don't really mind, at least for a starting point. He didn't lynch on them so that's fine. Hence, he's not quite as full of shit as he previously appeared, on that issue.
webadict's suspicions for today are Pandarsenic, for doing a running passive-aggressive commentary of the game, NativeForeigner, for ?, and myself, for ?. Hence, his suspicions are absolutely atrocious (this is what I thought when I said it; I take it back a little) and completely arbitrary (I don't take this back, because it seems like he's making a deliberate choice to suspect me).
They are separate issues.
Jim: Before you decide on Dariush, I would like you to please restate your case on him and then provide your two runner ups and why, including why you might be choosing Dariush above them.
He was a giant sack of uselessness and passiveness on Day 1, and on Day 2 he's not doing much better. Then he's trying to blend in with everybody else for being wrong about Zrk2, and trying to convince people that he always suspected Zrk2 even though he spent a good majority of his scumhunting on Day 1 trying to build a case on Ottofar, and there's only really post which can be loosely interpreted as him suspecting Zrk2. Then he said he didn't want to be accused of bandwagoning, so he didn't say he suspected Zrk2.
Passive, inconsistent or unclear suspicions, and actively avoiding suspicion.