Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Dariush]

Well, sorry for lack of response to other answers to my questions. I see that my questions about kingmaker were indeed useless because I didn't realize that it would be better for town to risk lynching kingmaker than not lynch scum. My mistake, sorry.

Jim:

Awesome. A round of questions directed at nobody in particular. This is going to be completely useless.

Not at nobody - at everybody. I think gathering answers to same questions from everyone will give more results than just asking one question per person.

The questions are so general as to be completely worthless. You're not going to get anything out of anybody until you hound them for what they've done instead of answers to hypothetical questions.

The only thing anybody 'did' this game was Ottofar claiming his role. Everything else was answers to amazingly non-general questions by webadict, which didn't help the scumhunting a bit.

I see you trying to make a case against Ottofar. If nobody counterclaims Ottofar he is the Kingmaker and as good as confirmed town. So I don't know why you're trying, unless you're desperate.

I am not trying to make a case against him; I directly stated that I don't have sufficient material to accuse anyone with certainty. I just said that his claim is the only foothold in the investigation.

You're asking a bunch of questions about Ottofar and whether he's a scum fakeclaiming Kingmaker. I think it's pretty clear that you're trying to make a case against him.

I just wanted to look at the situation from all possible sides. Now I see that I was wrong about suspecting him.

[webadict]

Well, sorry for lack of response to other answers to my questions. I see that my questions about kingmaker were indeed useless because I didn't realize that it would be better for town to risk lynching kingmaker than not lynch scum. My mistake, sorry.

Jim:

Awesome. A round of questions directed at nobody in particular. This is going to be completely useless.

Not at nobody - at everybody. I think gathering answers to same questions from everyone will give more results than just asking one question per person.

The questions are so general as to be completely worthless. You're not going to get anything out of anybody until you hound them for what they've done instead of answers to hypothetical questions.

The only thing anybody 'did' this game was Ottofar claiming his role. Everything else was answers to amazingly non-general questions by webadict, which didn't help the scumhunting a bit.

I see you trying to make a case against Ottofar. If nobody counterclaims Ottofar he is the Kingmaker and as good as confirmed town. So I don't know why you're trying, unless you're desperate.

I am not trying to make a case against him; I directly stated that I don't have sufficient material to accuse anyone with certainty. I just said that his claim is the only foothold in the investigation.

You're asking a bunch of questions about Ottofar and whether he's a scum fakeclaiming Kingmaker. I think it's pretty clear that you're trying to make a case against him.

I just wanted to look at the situation from all possible sides. Now I see that I was wrong about suspecting him.

Told ya. Now, who would you lynch if you were me?

[Zrk2]

Re Everyone: Thanks for the input derived from my bitchy post. Jim seems less scummy every time he talks.

Mindmaker He is presenting a case based on discontinunities and a general (apparently to him) lack of townieness. What do you do?

Pandarseinc Who, other than me seems somewhat scummy to you?

Jim Groovester Thanks for the answer, now, if you were a scum, how would you hide it?

[Jim Groovester]

By aggressively scumhunting like town.

webadict, it's been a week. What's taking you so long?

[Mindmaker]

Mindmaker He is presenting a case based on discontinunities and a general (apparently to him) lack of townieness. What do you do?

Who against whom?

webadict, it's been a week. What's taking you so long?

I would guess, he's not satisfied with the suspects he's having.
But I too would like to know, what he's thinking about the situation.

[Zrk2]

Mindmaker He is presenting a case based on discontinunities and a general (apparently to him) lack of townieness. What do you do?

Who against whom?

webadict, it's been a week. What's taking you so long?

I would guess, he's not satisfied with the suspects he's having.
But I too would like to know, what he's thinking about the situation.

Generic player against you.

[Pandarsenic]

Dariush's set of questions to everyone wasn't particular helpful and he only did it because he was forced. And he tried to form a case against a Confirmed Townie.

He is still in no way as bad as you, Zrk2.

[NativeForeigner]

Well, sorry for lack of response to other answers to my questions. I see that my questions about kingmaker were indeed useless because I didn't realize that it would be better for town to risk lynching kingmaker than not lynch scum. My mistake, sorry.

Jim:

Awesome. A round of questions directed at nobody in particular. This is going to be completely useless.

Not at nobody - at everybody. I think gathering answers to same questions from everyone will give more results than just asking one question per person.

The questions are so general as to be completely worthless. You're not going to get anything out of anybody until you hound them for what they've done instead of answers to hypothetical questions.

The only thing anybody 'did' this game was Ottofar claiming his role. Everything else was answers to amazingly non-general questions by webadict, which didn't help the scumhunting a bit.

I see you trying to make a case against Ottofar. If nobody counterclaims Ottofar he is the Kingmaker and as good as confirmed town. So I don't know why you're trying, unless you're desperate.

I am not trying to make a case against him; I directly stated that I don't have sufficient material to accuse anyone with certainty. I just said that his claim is the only foothold in the investigation.

You're asking a bunch of questions about Ottofar and whether he's a scum fakeclaiming Kingmaker. I think it's pretty clear that you're trying to make a case against him.

I just wanted to look at the situation from all possible sides. Now I see that I was wrong about suspecting him.

I really can't tell whether or not this is blazing sarcasm.

Zrk2, you're painting yourself to be a decent candidate to be executed. Probably the only way to save yourself is to find someone scummier than you, which doesn't seem likely right now. Who are your top scumpicks and why? (Sorry if I already asked this, I forget things over the weekend).

[Zrk2]

Well, in answer to the fact that I apparently look scummy; I am still new to Mafia, I have played before, but I am still learning the nuances of the game, and so amy make mistakes that seem scummy, but are just inexperience. I think Dariush is very scummy, as he is lurking horribly. I may be inexperienced, but at least I am not lurking.

[Jim Groovester]

Well, in answer to the fact that I apparently look scummy; I am still new to Mafia, I have played before, but I am still learning the nuances of the game, and so amy make mistakes that seem scummy, but are just inexperience. I think Dariush is very scummy, as he is lurking horribly. I may be inexperienced, but at least I am not lurking.

_RRRRGGGGHHHH

So am I just supposed to ignore whatever scumminess you're dropping because you're new? You should have never trotted out this excuse. It will always fall on unsympathetic ears, and always looks like a crappy excuse.

And Dariush really isn't lurking horribly or even lurking at all, so he's not really scummy for that reason. You got another one?

You're scum; go hang. Maybe you will one day if webadict ever makes up his mind.

[webadict]

Well, geez. I'm still stuck on a three-way tie between Dariush, Pandarsenic, and Jokerman-EXE.

But, man...

Hmph.

I've got to make a decision here... Bah, I can't just yet.

[NativeForeigner]

Well, geez. I'm still stuck on a three-way tie between Dariush, Pandarsenic, and Jokerman-EXE.

But, man...

Hmph.

I've got to make a decision here... Bah, I can't just yet.

Could you restate (or relink) your case on each of them?

[Jim Groovester]

Okay, I can see Dariush, but why Pandarsenic and Jokerman-EXE?

You can't just drop their names there without a reason, especially if you're thinking about lynching them. You'll need a case.

I don't like this. I don't like how you're not being transparent or decisive. What kind of lynch are you angling for? One you can benefit from as scum? You've certainly taken your time winding your way there.

[Jokerman-EXE]

Well, in answer to the fact that I apparently look scummy; I am still new to Mafia, I have played before, but I am still learning the nuances of the game, and so amy make mistakes that seem scummy, but are just inexperience. I think Dariush is very scummy, as he is lurking horribly. I may be inexperienced, but at least I am not lurking.

I was lynched my first couple of games D1 because I was new and I was dropping tells. It's not an excuse you can get away with from anyone here.

Well, geez. I'm still stuck on a three-way tie between Dariush, Pandarsenic, and Jokerman-EXE.

wat.

I'd be interested in hearing your reasoning as well. I'd also like to know why, if you're having trouble deciding, you haven't asked for any input from anyone - in fact, you said earlier that you were doing fine without it. The question then becomes, if you're doing fine without it, why are you having a hard time deciding?

[Pandarsenic]

I like how Wuba hasn't said a word to me in ages and suddenly drops my name as a scum candidate. Real cute, Wuba.

Also, agreed with Jim on "I can has ur reasons plx?"