Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: Nobody wants anything to do with me  (Read 4908 times)

Kay12

  • Bay Watcher
  • Fighting for Elite Liberal values since 2009!
    • View Profile
Re: Nobody wants anything to do with me
« Reply #15 on: December 28, 2010, 11:27:56 am »

I agree, but the game getting easier is partly necessary, because of the fulfilling of the liberal agenda.
Logged
Try Liberal Crime Squad, an excellent Liberal Crime adventure game by Toady One and the open source community!
LCS in SourceForge - LCS Wiki - Forum thread for 4.04

Asmodeous

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Nobody wants anything to do with me
« Reply #16 on: December 28, 2010, 01:19:39 pm »

With the new version, you can not recruit anyone without at least one point of persuasion.  However, you can still obtain recruits by freeing slaves/servants, sweatshop workers, prisoners, or child workers.  As previously mentioned, you can learn to persuade via college classes, which are fairly quick.

You can't recruit anyone without persuasion skill? That seems harsh, especially for new players. What if, as in the OP, you don't have persuasion skill on your founder?

I would think the solution would be the founder should get a minimum of 1 Persuasion. I mean, what leader doesn't have at least a bare minimum understanding of how to persuade people?
Logged
(There is a story behind this. . .)

This is an Alder Omelette. All craftsdwarfship is of highest quality. It is encircled with bands of cheese. It menaces with spikes of bacon, ham, and peppers. On the object is an image of dwarves in egg white. The dwarves are eating.

Innominate

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Nobody wants anything to do with me
« Reply #17 on: December 28, 2010, 10:55:37 pm »

Well one way of slightly smoothing out the difficulty curve would be having society oppose the LCS's more radical actions when they get more liberal; once the zeitgeist has turned in favour of liberalism, blowing the heads off a group of lab techs stops being a way to "fight the machine" and becomes "shit yeah, kill people!".

Essentially, people would overlook the LCS's actions in the middle of the game, because there's still work to be done (i.e. the violence is necessary). When you get closer to the end, people would start to look down upon violence because they don't think it's necessary.

Of course, the metric we use to decide where the middle or end of the game falls would have a huge impact on how difficult the game is. If we based it on public opinion, getting high levels of support would be extremely difficult. If it's based on the elections, it basically hasn't changed at all; once you've got a majority government the rest of the game is just waiting. So I'm not sure what we could use to decide when society judges the LCS as unnecessary.
Logged

Grimith

  • Bay Watcher
  • Terminator Founder
    • View Profile
Re: Nobody wants anything to do with me
« Reply #18 on: December 28, 2010, 11:03:12 pm »

I would think the solution would be the founder should get a minimum of 1 Persuasion. I mean, what leader doesn't have at least a bare minimum understanding of how to persuade people?

I disagree. If you want your founder to start with Persuasion, select the appropriate answers during character generation to achieve such. If you do not, or if you elect to have the RNG generate a background for you, you must accept the consequences of your decision. Automatically assuming the founder of the LCS must be a capable persuader would be most Arch-Conservative.

Regardless, it appears Jonathan has revised the recruiting code with this. Persuading low-quality Liberals ("Low-quality"? How Conservative!) will be possible without Persuasion. On the flip side, you will not command such a domineering persona that Corporate CEOs and Death Squad Officers will join your cause with barely a discussion.

Neonivek

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Nobody wants anything to do with me
« Reply #19 on: December 29, 2010, 02:00:20 am »

I would think the solution would be the founder should get a minimum of 1 Persuasion. I mean, what leader doesn't have at least a bare minimum understanding of how to persuade people?

I disagree. If you want your founder to start with Persuasion, select the appropriate answers during character generation to achieve such. If you do not, or if you elect to have the RNG generate a background for you, you must accept the consequences of your decision. Automatically assuming the founder of the LCS must be a capable persuader would be most Arch-Conservative.

Well you don't want to waste the players time with what could have otherwise just been given to the player.
Logged

Innominate

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Nobody wants anything to do with me
« Reply #20 on: December 29, 2010, 07:20:39 am »

I think part of the problem is that 0 skill is treated somewhat inconsistently. For some skills, 0 skill means that you can't even begin to learn it. For others, it just means that you're really, really bad at it. I don't think it's unrealistic to think that somebody would eventually get slightly better at not alienating people if they talked to enough of them. 0 persuasion should be analogous to that awkward guy who talks about bodily functions to hot girls, rather than to somebody who is actually so functionally incapable of social learning that they can't even take the slightest step towards not being universally ignored by people already sympathetic to their ideals.
Logged

Asmodeous

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Nobody wants anything to do with me
« Reply #21 on: December 29, 2010, 10:31:43 am »

I would think the solution would be the founder should get a minimum of 1 Persuasion. I mean, what leader doesn't have at least a bare minimum understanding of how to persuade people?

I disagree. If you want your founder to start with Persuasion, select the appropriate answers during character generation to achieve such. If you do not, or if you elect to have the RNG generate a background for you, you must accept the consequences of your decision. Automatically assuming the founder of the LCS must be a capable persuader would be most Arch-Conservative.

Nonsense. They're leading a movement. You can't lead a movement if you aren't at least slightly capable of leading. Otherwise the character would have never stepped up to lead. A persuasion of 1 is not "a capable persuader". A persuasion of 1 is about the level of your average Low-Level Manager. They can manage to convince someone to do something, but not very well and not very effectively, and most people will think they're moronic.

A Persuasion of 3-5 is a capable persuader. And yes, if you want that you should absolutely be picking the Persuasion answers during character generation.

Quote
Regardless, it appears Jonathan has revised the recruiting code with this. Persuading low-quality Liberals ("Low-quality"? How Conservative!) will be possible without Persuasion. On the flip side, you will not command such a domineering persona that Corporate CEOs and Death Squad Officers will join your cause with barely a discussion.

It doesn't seem to function very well, or it only seems to apply to the founder from my experience, because my 14H 0Per hippies can't get anyone to join them until I have them solicit donations for two or three weeks to get 1Per. If it only applies to the founder, that's fine, but as I always have at least 2Per on my found by the choices based on my play style, I am unable to say if it works right for the founder. (Edit: I was testing this on Crack Heads)

Also tying Per to Cha (like he mentioned in one of those posts you linked) does make a whole lot more sense. Is it possible to hybridize them? Because I would think Heart AND Cha should somehow impact it. Well, I know it's possible, the bigger question is "how much of a pain in the ass is it" I suppose.
Logged
(There is a story behind this. . .)

This is an Alder Omelette. All craftsdwarfship is of highest quality. It is encircled with bands of cheese. It menaces with spikes of bacon, ham, and peppers. On the object is an image of dwarves in egg white. The dwarves are eating.

Grimith

  • Bay Watcher
  • Terminator Founder
    • View Profile
Re: Nobody wants anything to do with me
« Reply #22 on: December 29, 2010, 11:03:41 am »

"You can't lead a movement if you aren't at least slightly capable of leading"? That's an argument for Leadership, not Persuasion, yet you still made an agreeable statement. However, I don't think proclaiming your intentions to start a Liberal Crime Squad with the goal of saving America automatically qualifies you to have every need fulfilled automatically; if that were the case, I'd proclaim my intentions to run for President so life would generate a sudden influx of cash. If memory serves correctly, selecting all of the Persuasion increasing options for your founder's biography results in 5 Persuasion; if you throw in the "manifesto" bit on question 10, you can also get a point of Leadership. If you choose well enough to prepare your founder to lead people, then leading is a cinch. Otherwise, go out and earn it!

Also, I'd like a (Heart+Charisma)/2 formula for Persuasion; it looks much better than Heart being the sole attribute modifier for it.

Asmodeous

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Nobody wants anything to do with me
« Reply #23 on: December 29, 2010, 12:10:44 pm »

Given that it is currently heart/2, (heart+cha)/2 could easily be obscene. I would go with (H+Cha)/3 to level it out a bit more.
Logged
(There is a story behind this. . .)

This is an Alder Omelette. All craftsdwarfship is of highest quality. It is encircled with bands of cheese. It menaces with spikes of bacon, ham, and peppers. On the object is an image of dwarves in egg white. The dwarves are eating.

Jonathan S. Fox

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
    • http://www.jonathansfox.com/
Re: Nobody wants anything to do with me
« Reply #24 on: December 29, 2010, 03:15:56 pm »

I would think the solution would be the founder should get a minimum of 1 Persuasion. I mean, what leader doesn't have at least a bare minimum understanding of how to persuade people?

I disagree. If you want your founder to start with Persuasion, select the appropriate answers during character generation to achieve such. If you do not, or if you elect to have the RNG generate a background for you, you must accept the consequences of your decision. Automatically assuming the founder of the LCS must be a capable persuader would be most Arch-Conservative.

Nonsense. They're leading a movement. You can't lead a movement if you aren't at least slightly capable of leading. Otherwise the character would have never stepped up to lead. A persuasion of 1 is not "a capable persuader". A persuasion of 1 is about the level of your average Low-Level Manager. They can manage to convince someone to do something, but not very well and not very effectively, and most people will think they're moronic.

A Persuasion of 3-5 is a capable persuader. And yes, if you want that you should absolutely be picking the Persuasion answers during character generation.

It is entirely possible to create a character that is unsuited to leading a movement at the beginning of the game, but is very suited to other jobs, and I think that makes an interesting choice. The founder gets extremely good stats, a large bucket of starting skills, an automatic +5 or +6 recruit slots, and people will throw themselves in front of bullets for you if you give them the opportunity; you have the potential to lead, you just need to convince people to join you.

The way things should work with the latest code on SVN (not the download in the sticky yet; I've only built on my Mac, not recompiled a new build for Windows), a 0 persuasion character with half-decent Charisma will have a 1-in-3 chance of getting a "low level" character to meet you for recruitment; all bets are off once you get there, but if you fail at that stage, it should be obvious why you're failing to recruit -- plus, you'll gain persuasion at that point.

Quote
Regardless, it appears Jonathan has revised the recruiting code with this. Persuading low-quality Liberals ("Low-quality"? How Conservative!) will be possible without Persuasion. On the flip side, you will not command such a domineering persona that Corporate CEOs and Death Squad Officers will join your cause with barely a discussion.

It doesn't seem to function very well, or it only seems to apply to the founder from my experience, because my 14H 0Per hippies can't get anyone to join them until I have them solicit donations for two or three weeks to get 1Per. If it only applies to the founder, that's fine, but as I always have at least 2Per on my found by the choices based on my play style, I am unable to say if it works right for the founder. (Edit: I was testing this on Crack Heads)

Also tying Per to Cha (like he mentioned in one of those posts you linked) does make a whole lot more sense. Is it possible to hybridize them? Because I would think Heart AND Cha should somehow impact it. Well, I know it's possible, the bigger question is "how much of a pain in the ass is it" I suppose.

If you didn't recompile the game from the source code on SVN, the changes aren't in yet, since I'm on vacation and haven't compiled the changes into a release. If you did recompile the game, there are some additional changes I didn't mention -- I changed Persuasion to Charisma instead of Heart in the same SVN commit, and in exchange put Leadership into Heart instead of Charisma (only relevant if you make a Leadership check, which I don't think happens anywhere). So the Hippies could be unable to get anyone to join them in recruitment if they have extremely low Charisma (lower than the founder can possibly start with).

Also, I'd like a (Heart+Charisma)/2 formula for Persuasion; it looks much better than Heart being the sole attribute modifier for it.

Given that it is currently heart/2, (heart+cha)/2 could easily be obscene. I would go with (H+Cha)/3 to level it out a bit more.

To clarify on the dividing by two, the bonus to your skill from stats is the stat divided by two, up to a maximum of three more than the skill value; the cap on the skill is still your stat value.

It used to be more possible to make skills use combinations of stats, and there were formerly lots of skills that used multiple stats. Religion, for example, was 50-50 Heart and Wisdom. But eventually I nailed everything into one stat, since that's a marginal improvement with the high cost of making it even harder to figure out how the game works without a guide. It would now be pretty difficult to make hybrid skills, but I think we can get away with just tying Persuasion to Charisma -- though I obviously sympathize with the idea of making it tied to Heart, since I must have thought it was a good idea to put it there at some point.
Logged

Grimith

  • Bay Watcher
  • Terminator Founder
    • View Profile
Re: Nobody wants anything to do with me
« Reply #25 on: December 30, 2010, 02:24:13 am »

Skills are no longer combinations of attributes? Such knowledge helps to confirm the obsolete nature of the LCSWiki. Ergo, I updated the Skills page of said wiki in an attempt to better inform the masses. Many other pages could use such Liberal attention.

Toksyuryel

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Nobody wants anything to do with me
« Reply #26 on: December 30, 2010, 04:26:22 am »

Skills are no longer combinations of attributes? Such knowledge helps to confirm the obsolete nature of the LCSWiki. Ergo, I updated the Skills page of said wiki in an attempt to better inform the masses. Many other pages could use such Liberal attention.
Just one small correction for you, bluffing actually trains disguise, not persuasion (this was my main method for training disguise on my Ninja Founder).
Logged

Grimith

  • Bay Watcher
  • Terminator Founder
    • View Profile
Re: Nobody wants anything to do with me
« Reply #27 on: December 30, 2010, 04:30:52 am »

Well, whaddya doing writing that correction here!? You think I have a Magic LCSWiki Editing Pass? Go fix what I wrote!

Toksyuryel

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Nobody wants anything to do with me
« Reply #28 on: December 30, 2010, 04:54:55 am »

Well, whaddya doing writing that correction here!? You think I have a Magic LCSWiki Editing Pass? Go fix what I wrote!
For some utterly baffling reason, the wiki uses javascript for functions such as editing the page or even viewing its history, and this javascript does not want to work. I have the site allowed in noscript, so I have no idea what's causing it to fail- clicking the links simply does nothing at all.
Logged

Jonathan S. Fox

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
    • http://www.jonathansfox.com/
Re: Nobody wants anything to do with me
« Reply #29 on: December 30, 2010, 05:10:56 am »

Well, whaddya doing writing that correction here!? You think I have a Magic LCSWiki Editing Pass? Go fix what I wrote!
For some utterly baffling reason, the wiki uses javascript for functions such as editing the page or even viewing its history, and this javascript does not want to work. I have the site allowed in noscript, so I have no idea what's causing it to fail- clicking the links simply does nothing at all.

Well... okay then, fair enough. ;) I switched the text over on the Wiki.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]