quote:
Originally posted by Red Jackard:
<STRONG>quoting a game of all things instead of looking up where the word they used came from</STRONG>
Yes, that was rather pathetic, but Wikipedia verifies what I said.
quote:
Originally posted by Red Jackard:
<STRONG>using naming scheme specific to The Hobbit as part of your reasoning</STRONG>
Tolkien popularized the use of the plural form "dwarves", so it is you that is using naming scheme specific to The Hobbit as part of your reasoning.
quote:
Originally posted by Red Jackard:
<STRONG>spellcheck for a fictional word</STRONG>
The spellchecker has no problem with "elf", which is just as fictional.
quote:
Originally posted by Red Jackard:
<STRONG>'Dwarves' is more appropriate for English. 'Dwarfs' makes you sound like an idiot.</STRONG>
Such a compelling argument...</sarcasm>
EDIT:
quote:
Originally posted by Sappho:
<STRONG>Linguistically speaking, "dwarfs" is the correct English plural of dwarf. The only reason people tend to use "dwarves" is because Tolkien invented that spelling with his books, and they were so popular that it stuck.In any case, I don't see how it matters where the dwarf originated. It always fascinates me that humans are so obsessed with the earliest version of something somehow being the most important, or accurate. That's not to say that I'm not guilty of it myself - I get angry when I see fabulous books, like the Lord of the Rings, turned into movies because they are never "right," even though the movies are good in their own way. It's just a tendency we have I suppose.
Still, it's strange. I think our dwarves are awesome, and I think the original dwarves were probably awesome too. I don't think either is more "accurate," though it can be interesting to note how the myth has evolved over time.
</STRONG>
Thank you Sappho! I think you see where I'm coming from. I'm looking at this from a historical perspective.
[ December 23, 2007: Message edited by: Fenrir ]