Hey, that faith in the gamer community I had?
http://www.edge-online.com/news/mass-effect-pledgers-thought-they-were-paying-new-ending
Shattered. I guess I learned my lesson.
So, a few people too dumb to understand the concept of charity represent all of the people involved? It says right there in the article that 'some people' sent mail about that.
Agreed. Given how hostile gaming media have been to critics of ME3 and the fact that no numbers or posts are cited in the edge article to indicate the magnitude I'm inclined to think that these are a minority used to strawman the majority, similar to how they also tried to marginalize critics by accusing them of homophobia and misogyny. That said, even if I don't agree with Jerry and Mike's opinion on ME3, I strongly agree with them discouraging the use of their charity for blatant marketing purposes, as this can often be underhanded.
I don't really see the appeal in "Retake Mass Effect". It seems wasteful, like a campaign to get George Lucas and M. Night Shyamalan to start making good movies. They've got their heads so far up their asses that they don't see how gaping plot holes, trite characters, and general bad pacing and writing are flaws that they need to address (Bioware is further hampered by their lapdogs at IGN and Destructoid trying as hard as they can to stop the spread of word-of-mouth, unlike legitimate journalists like Erik Kain). While EA is somewhat to blame and I can't really condemn the Bioware team for phoning it in given what always happens to EA's subsidiaries, I can still say that Bioware, in their hubris, brought this on themselves. Their last major releases have been a mediocre game and two bad games, so they've already been given far more leeway than Westwood and Bullfrog. At this point, the best thing that any consumer can do is acknowledge that it's a lost cause and the best option is to stop financially supporting their products and inform other consumers to do the same, so that the executives can put the studio out of its misery and the creators can move on. What's the point of offering creative criticism to people who believe that the title of "artist" grants infallibility?