As soon as someone expresses interest in a position of authority, I find it hard to trust them. There's no reason to desire power unless in pursuit of an agenda, which almost certainly falls into one of two categories.
1. Personal Ambition
2. Conceited belief that one knows how others should live
3. Because it's the best thing to do
A recent example is that me and a group of other people are renting a house for a year next year. When we were putting all our names down, there came the question of who should be head tenant - the position of head tenant is one of responsibility, and since you become the middle man between the letting agency and the rest of the tenants, it can also be considered a position of authority.
Not exactly. I doubt you were awarded too much coercive ability, and if you tried to abuse your position, I'm sure that retribution would be swift and exact within a small group.
Interesting. So you're at roughly the hunter/gatherer stage of social development then? Don't worry, there are still a few likeminded societies left, you could go join them! You would have to give up all those modern things like medicine, industry, sanitary food, actual housing, electricity, and internet access, but all those are just Authoritarian Chains that totally require logistics, organization, and other Authoritarian Bullshit, so you'll probably be happier.
Organization does not require coercive authority. I don't know why people get so stuck on this idea. All that's required for organization is collective agreement on a goal, and someone with knowledge of how to attain that goal to guide (not threaten) other members of the group if the knowledge isn't universal. Disagreement shouldn't result in punishment, only non-participation. And I can explain to you how every one of those modern benefits you listed is actually hindered by authoritative hierarchy if you wish.
This thread's getting seriously derailed, though. Any new developments on the topic? I just woke up.