Unvote Toaster: I still think your role is scummy, but I like your proposal to neutralise someone else in exchange for your own life. When we're closer to the end of the day, depending on who you choose to do this to, I may reevaluate my perceived scumminess of you. If you don't do it, though, then you're hanging for sure.
About the potential cult: as I said earlier, as far as I know there isn't one, but discussion about it is useful. Some thoughts:
Next up: If there is a revivocult, who is the leader?[...]
First, who can't be the leader, and why:
Jokerman-EXE: Dead and flipped.
Mr.Person, Zathras: Died and flipped, then came back.
NativeForeigner: Delayed N1 when there was a res.
Ottofar: Modkill for inactivity, plus revive. I was slow sending my action N1 and got threatened with this, so I am almost positive it's because he never sent an action.
Nirur Torir and Pandarsenic: Nirur claims to have blocked Pandar twice, and Pandar confirms he was blocked at least once.
I disagree about Ottofar. He died and revived, the only difference is he didn't flip. I'd add him to the "revival oddities" list, rather than the potential innocents list. Wuba is many things, but
generous I don't think is one of them.
Archangel has demonstrated his hammer power. This makes him unlikely in my book to be the leader, as that would require Web to USE THE SAME UNUSUAL CUSTOM ROLE TWO GAMES IN A ROW.
Why does this apply only to Archangel, and not to the game in general? Last game, Arch was "Loki", a jester with the hammer power; ToonyMan was the "Webadict" revivocult... I don't see why you single out Arch here.
That leaves MBP, Irony, and Argembarger. Personally, I say we lynch MBP and be done with him, and I can nuke one of the other two.
I'm OK with that plan. I'm fine with lynching whoever people seem to think is most likely to be the cult leader, barring someone scummier. However, from your list I'd choose Argembarger first, as he's scummier and possible Jokerman's scumbuddy even if not cultist.
For clarity, my scumpicks in order: Toaster, for reasons exposed D2; Pandar, for reasons exposed D2 plus recent waffling/uselessness (see below), but is boring to lynch him if he's just going to revive; Argembarger, for D2 scumminess and seeming like Joker's and Pandar's buddy; MBP & Org, general uselessness & vagueness, they bug me, plus Org was blocked the night there was no kill.
MBP: What can you say to convince us that you're not a cultist leader? Who do you think are Jokerman's scumbuddies, and why aren't you after them? You seem to think Pandar is some flavour or other of scum, so what do you propose to do about it?
Pandarsenic: I still think you are scum. Your laziness excuse about Jokerman doesn't pass the smell test, you've still failed to make a consistent case on
anyone, and you haven't answered my
previous questions.Org: ...eh. Why bother asking you anything. Just know I think you're scum. Why? You said it yourself: you were blocked and there was no kill. Nurir claims to have blocked someone else. So mafiakiller is you.
Argembarger: I still think you are Joker's scumbuddy. Please tell me how you plan to convince me that's not so. While you're there, tell me your opinions on last night lack of a kill, of Pandar's "I was lazy" excuse, and on Toaster's claim. If you had a roleblock, would you use it on Pandar tonight? How about on Org? What do you say about you being a potential cultist? You haven't claimed any actions for N1 or N2 (that I recall); would you, to assuage suspicions of cult-recruiting? Please tell me your scum picks.
So! Questions for everyone: Were you blocked at any time N1 or N2? Did you block Org? Do you have any explanation for a lack of a kill last night?
No to all.