Pandarsenic, you haven't posted in about 36 hours, yet have been online a few times. Either answer my questions, or I will use your complete refusal to commit to anything on Jokerman against you tomorrow, should he flip scum.
Unofficial votecount, based partially off of the LukerTracker
®:
Zathras[1 vote] Ottofar
Pandarsenic
Org[1 vote] IronyOwl
Ottofar
Argembarger
Toaster[1 vote] Org
Archangel
MysteriousBluePuppet
IronyOwl
Jokerman-EXE[3 votes<possibly 5>] NF, Nirur, Zathras
NativeForeigner[2 votes] Toaster, Jokerman
Nirur Torir[2 votes] Argembarger, Pandarsenic
Novote: MBP, Archangel
Not much has happened since the last extension, and the day will probably end soon. Since Pandarsenic feels that my points against him are invalid but hasn't explained why, I may easily go after him passive-aggressively while questioning others. Notably, I'll be attempting to get people who seem willing to end the day without clearly stating that they want to lynch their vote choice, to define the reasons for their votes.
Ottofar: If his number of revives had a hidden limit, he wouldn't be acting this way. Your vote on Zathras was because of a question. Is your vote still on him because you feel he should be lynched but can't be bothered to question him, or because you don't feel like moving your vote?
Argembarger: I have answered your questions. Do you still feel that I need to be lynched? Why or why not?
Archangel: You're not voting. Why?
MBP: How's your checking going?
IronyOwl: Org's highly unlikely to get lynched today if things go at the same rate. Will you be trying to lynch Org?
Jokerman: Do you still feel that NF needs to die? You haven't been doing much to try to get him lynched.
NF: Your statement about Jokerman needing a lynch was several pages ago. Do you still feel this way?
Org: I may never understand your voting method.
Toaster: You do have an interesting counterargument, but why do you feel the need to defend him, when he won't defend himself? Furthermore, you stating that hypothesis nullifies any benefits he may have gotten if he had been town and claiming slightly falsely. Your vote on NF was to get his attention. Do you still feel that your vote belongs on him?
Nirur Torir's arguments:
[...]
2) A series of increasingly complex and improbable explanations that achieve similar results because he's desperate~
2) What am I desperate to do? I've made it abundantly clear that I can roleblock you easily.
Jokerman did indeed lie about:
a) stating that he had evidence my previous role was scum;
b) stating that he had knowledge he didn't have, to make himself look better in the eyes of town;
c) stating I had knowledge I didn't have;
d) that he felt confident his daykill target would hit scum;
e) denying saying what he had indeed said.
Jokerman did admit to:
a) using his daykill without any evidence at all on his target's alignment, based only on self preservation, emotion, and gut feel; this is utterly scummy.
b) doing this only to shut up his attacker ("OMGUS? - it totally was!"); scummy.
c) defending a practice he considers detrimental to town; scummy.
d) intending to kill lurkers without regard to their alignment (though he may backtrack on this and admit to lying instead); super-scummy.
e) multiple contradictions; scummy.
f) placing an OMGUS vote, and then denying it was OMGUS, then admitting under pressure he had no basis for it; super-scummy.
What about the above quote is insufficiently suspicious for even a passing mention? Is Zathras just completely misguided? Explain.
Pandarsenic, please restate your case against me.