My point was that you're comparison is useless because you're an atheist.
It is very useful indeed. You claim that we are all at fault for living our lives "in sin" when your god has set impossible goals to not do so. By extension, I would have to think that you are also in support of the argument that "god doesn't send people to hell, they send themselves". I have made the comparison between the actions of your god in setting a bar that no human can reach with a mafia boss extorting shopkeepers to show that your god is acting in a malevolent manner by doing so. I still don't know exactly why you brought ghosts into this.
He's saying that you think of his god holding as much validity as a ghost setting fire to you.
Which is probably true...
It is true. Doesn't change a word I have typed.
Quick question: Can we just rip the bible in half and pretend that only the new testiment counts?
No. Jesus said that he came to fufill the old law, not to abolish it. Old Testament counts, no matter how much people want to shout that it doesn't.
I mean are you realy going to condem a rather large group of people for some moral lessons that are no longer applicable in todays society, when the moajrity havn't even read the bible?
I'm certainly going to condemn them for being hypocrites who pick and choose from the parts of the Bible they like/are told to like while, yes, sometimes not reading it themselves. (Unless by "large group" you don't mean the christians themselves, in which case I don't know who you mean.)
I read some of it, but I'm agnostic, heading towards athiest, but I value what christans do for society too much.
What does that have to do with anything? Christians are people like you and me, most of the things they do have absolutely nothing to do with being christians. They are no more valuble to society than atheists, or anyone else for that matter. Even so, what they do shouldn't stop you from making choices about the existance of gods.