Unvote.
I'm not suggesting no lynch, but no lynch would be better than a mislynch. We mislynch and we lose 2 townies. We don't lynch and we lose 1 and have a better idea at who might be scum.
I randomvoted at first to see how the pressure would be handled and I unvoted to, as I said, avoid lynching someone without reason.
The parroting was because
I thought the post had failed, but it was sent prematurely. :/
Anyway, as I was saying, if we go with no lynch rather than a likely mislynch, we only lose one town and have a better idea as to who the Scum is based on the NK.
I unvoted Pandar after someone else voted for him to avoid a potential bandwagoning that wasn't yet deserved.
And the parroting was because I had no original idea at the time and I needed to post, so I sought to reinforce a given idea. But I guess that wasn't a very good plan.
No. No we don't. No lynching does nothing helpful at all. It gives the scum a free kill. There's too much WIFOM involved to have any chance of divining anything from a NK. We get more info from the roleflip of a suspicious person. Either we've
a) killed a mafia
b) got rid of someone who would screw us over at LYLO.
I've seen attitude quite a bit from new players, though, so I don't think this is a scumtell.
Oh no two people voted Pandar huge bandwagon HAMMER!
Nope, doesn't work that way. Still seems like a new player mistake.
I don't take too much issue with the parroting, it's just something to watch.
I'll still be watching you though, you're still suspicious.
Dariush, explain why you wanted to stop me from contributing today, and shut down discussion.